CSF’s Stallmer Slams FAA’s Proposed Commercial Space Regulations
Commercial Spaceflight Federation (CSF) President Eric Stallmer minced no words at a congressional hearing today slamming new proposed regulations for the commercial space transportation industry. The FAA’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) is under White House direction to modernize its regulations to be more business-friendly. FAA released the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for comment in April and today Stallmer said the proposals “in some ways are worse than today’s obsolete rules.”
At a hearing before the Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, Stallmer said the preamble of the NPRM “cites many of the right goals, but the proposed regulations do not deliver on them.” Specific criticisms are that the 580-page NPRM:
- is not adequately performance-based as intended,
- adds burdens and costs,
- is confusing and relies on missing documents,
- lacks the flexibility to allow for innovation,
- is anti-competitive in many ways creating new burdens to entry for users, and
- attempts to “fix” things that were not broken adding more even more burdens
CSF is a trade association that represents more than 85 member companies and organizations. Stallmer said all the license applicants among its members want DOT and FAA to engage with industry and release a supplemental NPRM. “We appreciate the Administration’s eagerness to reform the FAA’s obsolete rules, but we really need to get this right.”
The regulations as written in the NPRM “would definitely set us back” in U.S. leadership in commercial space, he told Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX). The rules are written more for traditional expendable launch vehicles, not innovative designs like capture-carry hybrid reusable vehicles he explained.
President Trump signed Space Policy Directive-2 (SPD-2) in May 2018. It directed Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao to modernize the regulations for the commercial space industry and consider requiring a single license for all types of commercial space flight launch and reentry operations and replacing prescriptive requirements with performance-based criteria. The proposed regulations were supposed to be released for comment by February 1, 2019, but were delayed to April 15 because of the 35-day government shutdown.
Today’s hearing was broadly on commercial space issues. Subcommittee chair Rep. Kendra Horn (D-OK) said it was intended to be “commercial space 101” to help the subcommittee prioritize issues to focus on in future hearings. Other witnesses were Bhavya Lal from IDA’s Science and Technology Policy Institute (STPI), Carissa Christensen from Bryce Space & Technology, Mike French from the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA), and Laura Montgomery, an attorney and law professor at Catholic University.

SpacePolicyOnline.com live-tweeted the hearing. Some of our tweets are reproduced below. Check our Twitter feed @SpcPlcyOnline for more.
At the H hrg, Bhavya Lal, STPI, recommends that mission designs/architectures be flexible enuf to incorporate cmrcl solutions when they are ready, and fixed price milestone contracta should be the norm not the exception.
— Marcia Smith (@SpcPlcyOnline) July 25, 2019
Carissa Christensen, Bryce: Govt has opp to leverage emerging cmrcl space companies, but “the price of leveraging this investor-funded, dynamic innovation is uncertainty.”
— Marcia Smith (@SpcPlcyOnline) July 25, 2019
Mike French, AIA: As NASA looks at expanding use of PPPs for the Artemis program, have to look at whether a market exists and how much development is required among other factors.
— Marcia Smith (@SpcPlcyOnline) July 25, 2019
Laura Montgomery, atty: FAA and FCC have put out NPRMs that actually create more regs and Congress has not given them authority to regulate in those areas.
And up to Congress not Exec Branch to decide interpretation of Outer Space Treaty provisions affecting cmrcl space act.— Marcia Smith (@SpcPlcyOnline) July 25, 2019
User Comments
SpacePolicyOnline.com has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate. We do not post comments that include links to other websites since we have no control over that content nor can we verify the security of such links.