Today’s Tidbits: April 16, 2018
Here are SpacePolicyOnline.com’s tidbits for April 16, 2018: new CSIS Space Threat Assessment report, an update on Europa Clipper, and the cause of the Long March 5 failure last year. Be sure to check our website for feature stories and follow us on Twitter (@SpcPlcyOnline) for more news and live tweeting of events.
CSIS Space Threat Assessment 2018
The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has issued a Space Threat Assessment 2018 that “reviews and aggregates open-source information on the counterspace capabilities and activities” of China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.
Read the latest @CSISAerospace report to learn what these things are and why they are a threat to U.S. space systems:https://t.co/Nxh8izKl4M pic.twitter.com/pKl3Va3k9F
— Todd Harrison (@ToddHarrisonDC) April 13, 2018
The Secure World Foundation issued its own open-source assessment of counterspace capabilities of those four countries plus the United States and India last week. The two reports are useful complements to each other.
Europa Clipper, John Culberson and the SLS Versus Commercial Rocket Debate
Ars Technica reporter Eric Berger has a good article today about JPL’s plans for the Europa Clipper mission to Jupiter’s moon Europa and the critical role being played by Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas). Culberson chairs the House Appropriations Commerce-Justice-Science subcommittee that funds NASA and has a passionate interest in space science, especially the prospect of finding life elsewhere. Politically speaking, he is almost single-handedly forcing NASA to build Europa Clipper through legislative direction and by removing the major obstacle — money. He wants it launched on NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) in 2022. NASA plans to launch it on a commercial rocket in 2025. He also wants a lander, launched by SLS in 2024. It’s an ongoing debate, as Eric explains. (Click the link in the tweet to read the article.)
Here’s a behind-the-scenes look at the high-stakes battle for the booster to launch the Europa Clipper.https://t.co/FOXPVaVmnA
— Eric Berger (@SciGuySpace) April 16, 2018
Long March 5 Failure Caused by Turbopump
Another really good article published today is by Andrew Jones. He usually writes for gbtimes.com, but this one was published in Space News. It summarizes China’s newly-released explanation for the Long March 5 failure last year during the rocket’s second flight. The problem was a turbopump in one of the first-stage engines that “failed while under ‘complex thermal conditions.'” The rocket is expected to make its return to flight towards the end of this year. (Click the link in the tweet to read the article.)
China reveals cause of Long March 5 failure; lunar sample mission to follow return-to-flight https://t.co/DREs9x821X pic.twitter.com/toihTSsdSJ
— SpaceNews (@SpaceNews_Inc) April 16, 2018
Recently Published on SpacePolicyOnline.com
- Bridenstine Nomination Finally Headed to the Senate Floor
- Pence Promises New Space Traffic Management Policy Soon
- Draft NASA Authorization Bill — Wait and See on ISS Transition, WFIRST
- What’s Happening in Space Policy April 15-21, 2018 — Updated
- Scott Pace Hints at Space Policy Announcement on Monday
- Today’s Tidbits: April 11, 2018
- NASA’s new robotic lunar program gets a thumbs up from lunar community; SWF reports on global counterspace capabilities, Lightfoot receives STA Leadership Award.
- Gallaudet: Commercial Weather Capabilities Taking Longer Than Expected
- Hertz Seeks to Calm Worries About Impact of Potential JWST Overrun
- Today’s Tidbits: April 10, 2018
- international team writing Woomera Manual on International Law of Military Space Operations; JAXA gets new President; NASA gets new Chief Scientist.
- Shelby Takes Over Senate Apprpriations, Defense Subcommittee; Moran to Chair CJS
- Today’s Tidbits: April 9, 2018
- WSJ reports Northrop Grumman responsible for Zuma loss, AFSPC Vice Commander relocates to the Pentagon, Orion Span plans a hotel in space.
User Comments
SpacePolicyOnline.com has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate. We do not post comments that include links to other websites since we have no control over that content nor can we verify the security of such links.