Category: Civil

Vasavada: Radiation is Problem NASA Needs to Solve for Human Missions

Vasavada: Radiation is Problem NASA Needs to Solve for Human Missions

Describing some of the Curiosity mission’s discoveries in the rover’s first year on Mars during a lecture commemorating its anniversary, Deputy Project Scientist Dr. Ashwin Vasavada explained that the high levels of radiation measured by the spacecraft indicate that a Mars-bound human mission would exceed NASA’s lifetime exposure limit for astronauts. “It is a problem, but NASA has to solve it,” said Vasavada. “NASA just has to design the spacecraft to shield the astronauts that much better.”

Vasavada, who spoke as part of the Von Kármán Lecture Series at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory on Thursday night, outlined the goals of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission, better known as Curiosity (the rover’s name).  “We are not looking for life with this mission,” he said.  The goal is to answer what he described as a “more practical question,” that is “whether Mars could have ever supported life.”

Reaching Mars in the first place was half the battle.  In describing the engineering challenge of landing “this beast,” Vasavada showed a slide (below) depicting the rover hanging from its skycrane during the landing sequence with the words “NO WAY” superimposed.  He suggested that it reflects the usual reaction of anybody who learned of the complicated steps required for a successful landing – what the agency dubbed the “7 minutes of terror.”

Image credit:  Ashwin Vasavada, JPL

As captured in a now-famous video showing ecstatic engineers at JPL and captivated citizens around the country, Curiosity performed the intricate dance perfectly and, on August 5, 2012 (Pacific Daylight Time, August 6 Eastern Daylight Time), landed safely on Mars at Gale Crater.

As it moves within the crater towards Mount Sharp, its target exploration site, Curiosity is “a little way into a long journey,” said Vasavada.  Yet already the measurements and images that the rover has sent to Earth have enabled significant scientific discoveries – from the engineering feat of figuring out the movement of the rover’s arm to allow for self-portraits, to finding examples of evidence that water once flowed on Mars and the detection of clay minerals, to finding that argon – not nitrogen – is the next most-common element in the Martian atmosphere.

“It’s not life-changing,” said Vasavada of the latter discovery, “but…it is rewriting the text-books.  Someone needs to update that Wikipedia page.”

The archived webcast of the lecture is available on JPL’s website.

 

Kepler Can't be Fixed, but Mission Far From Over

Kepler Can't be Fixed, but Mission Far From Over

NASA announced today that it has abandoned efforts to restore full operational capability to its planet-hunting Kepler space telescope.   Kepler’s principal investigator Bill Borucki made clear that doesn’t mean the mission is over, though.

During an afternoon press conference, a reporter referred to this being the end of Kepler and Borucki bristled, replying that the mission is far from over.  “This is NOT the end of the Kepler mission,” he exclaimed. The mission has two parts, making observations and analyzing the data from those observations.  It is only the acquisition of new exoplanet data that has come to an end, not the analysis. “The Kepler mission is no way done at this point,” he emphasized.

Kepler was launched in 2009 and acquired four years of data.  Scientists have analyzed the first two years of that data, but still have another two years of data to go.  Borucki is very optimistic that there are many discoveries yet to be found.  So far, scientists have confirmed 135 planets orbiting other stars — exoplanets.   The goal is to find an Earth-size planet orbiting a Sun-like star in that star’s “habitable zone.”  That has not been found yet.   A number of Earth-size planets have been discovered, but not within their stars’ habitable zones.   Slightly larger planets have been found within habitable zones, but the stars are cooler than our Sun.  

Borucki pointed out that Kepler finds planets by observing them as they cross (“transit”) the face of their star, so those found to date are close enough to make two or three orbits within the two years of data that have been analyzed.   Any planet in the habitable zone of a star like our Sun will, like Earth, take about a year to transit.  Several transits are required before a planet can be confirmed, so planets with one-year orbits hopefully will be revealed in the yet-to-be analyzed data.

Kepler no longer can acquire new exoplanet data, however.   It has four reaction wheels and three need to be operating to provide the requisite accuracy.   The modest life expectancy of these components is fairly well understood.   Not unexpectedly, one wheel failed last year and a second failed in May.  NASA engineers at Ames Research Center were trying to restore operations to one of the wheels, but ended those efforts last week.  Kepler completed its primary mission in November 2012.  NASA approved a 4-year extended mission hoping the reaction wheels would cooperate, but they did not.

Scientists are assessing whether Kepler can be used for other purposes, such as searching for asteroids or supernovae or for microlensing.   Ideas are being submitted and the Kepler team will make recommendations to NASA Headquarters about which, if any, are sufficiently practical to warrant funding if money is available.

That would be a bonus round.  Kepler already has demonstrated that there are many exoplanets in a variety of sizes orbiting a variety of types of stars.   Borucki said the Kepler data are “critically important to mankind’s future” because they are one step in discovering “our place in the galaxy and what life may be out there.” 

In April, NASA selected a new mission, the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), as part of its Explorer program for launch in 2017.   Led by MIT’s George Ricker, TESS will search for exoplanets around the nearest and brightest stars.

NASA IG Worries About Programmatic Risk to Orion Due To Funding Constraints

NASA IG Worries About Programmatic Risk to Orion Due To Funding Constraints

On the same day that NASA and the U.S. Navy tested operations for recovering the Orion spacecraft from an ocean landing, NASA’s Inspector General (IG) issued a report warning that NASA’s incremental development of Orion adds program risk.

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) report did not criticize NASA program managers, conceding that they are doing the best they can under current funding constraints.  Instead it reiterated warnings that incremental funding increases program risk and urged NASA program managers to be “as transparent as possible when discussing the issues” facing the program.  Funding constraints that force program managers to “adopt a less-than-optimal incremental development approach in which elements necessary to complete the most immediate steps are given priority” and other elements are pushed out into the future “increases risks.”

Referring to Orion as the Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV), the generic name used in the NASA Authorization Act of 2010, the report states that deadlines are already being stretched out:  “Specifically, test dates have slipped 4 years on the Ascent Abort-2 test and 9 months on the Exploration Flight Test-1.”  Development of life support systems also has been delayed.    Those are a portent of what is in store for NASA’s entire human exploration program in the current budget situation, the OIG asserts, and “it is unlikely that NASA would be able to conduct any surface exploration missions until the late 2020s at the earliest.”

Meanwhile, NASA and the Navy tested recovery techniques for lifting an Orion capsule out of the ocean onto a Navy ship today using a mockup of the capsule. 

 Mockup of Orion capsule next to U.S.S. Arlington, August 15, 2013.   Photo credit:  NASA

The Navy will recover a test version of the Orion spacecraft from the ocean next year at the conclusion of the Engineering Flight Test-1 (EFT-1), designed to test reentry characteristics.   The spacecraft will make two orbits of the Earth, reaching an altitude of 3,600 miles, which NASA describes as being further from the planet than any mission since Apollo 17, the final lunar Apollo mission in 1972.  The Navy has not recovered a NASA human exploration spacecraft from the ocean since the 1975 Apollo-Soyuz Test Project.  After decades of using the space shuttle, which landed on a runway, NASA is returning to ocean landings for the new Orion capsule.  Today’s Orion Stationary Recovery Test took place at Naval Station Norfolk, VA.  The Navy posted a video of some of the operations.

Orion is being designed to travel beyond low Earth orbit, eventually to Mars, although its precise intermediate destinations are still the subject of debate.

Correction:  An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that the EFT-1 mission would take the Orion test vehicle to the distance of the Moon and back.  It will only reach an altitude of 3,600 miles.  That is15 times further from Earth than the International Space Station, but far shy of the Moon (which is 240,000 miles away).

 

Space Policy Events for the Weeks of August 11-23, 2013

Space Policy Events for the Weeks of August 11-23, 2013

The following space policy events may be of interest in the next two weeks — for anyone who’s not on vacation!    Enjoy!   (Congress returns on September 9.)

Sunday-Thursday, August 11-15 (actually began yesterday)

Monday-Thursday, August 12-15

Tuesday, August 13

Thursday August 15

Thursday-Sunday, August 15-18

Friday-Sunday, August 16-18

  • DC-X +20
    • August 16, Spaceport America Virgin Galactic Gateway, Truth or Consequences, NM
    • August 17-18, New Mexico Museum of Space History, Alamagordo, NM

Tuesday, August 20

NRC Warns Landsat-Type Data Not Sustainable Under Current Practices

NRC Warns Landsat-Type Data Not Sustainable Under Current Practices

The National Research Council (NRC) today issued its much-anticipated report on how to ensure continuity of Landsat-type land imaging data.   The bottom line is that a sustained program is not viable under current mission development and management practices.  Instead, the NRC calls for a “systematic and deliberate program” instead of the “historical pattern of chaotic programmatic support and ad hoc design and implementation of spacecraft and sensors” that has characterized the Landsat program to date.

The NRC Committee on Implementation of a Sustained Land Imaging Program, chaired by Jeff Dozier of UC-Santa Barbara, was asked by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to assess the needs and opportunities to develop a space-based operational land imaging capability.  NASA launched the first Landsat (then called ERTS) in 1972, but the program experienced a tumultuous programmatic history beginning in the late 1970s.   Most recently, NASA has been responsible for designing, building and launching Landsat satellites while USGS operates them and distributes and archives the data.  Landsat 8 was launched in February 2013 and NASA turned responsibility for it over to USGS in May.

The NRC committee’s deliberations took place against a backdrop of fluid decision-making in the Administration and Congress as to agency roles and responsibilities for ensuring the availability of Landsat-type data for the long term.  Thanks to one of the satellites, Landsat 5, operating for more than 20 years past its design lifetime, the United States has a 40-year data set of satellite-based medium-resolution global land imagery.   The data are used for everything from land use planning to environmental monitoring to agricultural forecasting to Google Earth.  Users want to ensure that the collection of comparable satellite data continues uninterrupted.

In its FY2012 budget request, the Obama Administration proposed transferring program responsibility entirely to USGS, which then would contract with NASA to acquire the satellites just as NOAA acquires its weather satellites through NASA.   USGS wanted to begin planning for Landsat 9 and 10 and sought the NRC’s advice.

USGS is part of the Department of the Interior, and the Obama proposal failed to win over the Interior appropriations subcommittees, however.   They worried that other USGS programs would suffer because of the high cost of satellites and denied the request.   In its FY2014 budget request, released in April 2013, the Obama Administration changed course and decided to keep agency responsibilities as they are.   NASA Earth Science Division Director Mike Freilich since has made clear that he intends to create a multi-decadal “sustained and sustainable” land imaging program.  NASA and USGS are working together to assess options that may or may not involve launching another dedicated Landsat satellite.

The NRC committee chose not to make recommendations on agency roles and responsibilities “which in any event are properly in the purview of the executive and congressional branches of government.”  Instead, it focused on broader issues.  Chief among them are that the government “should establish a Sustained and Enhanced Land Imaging Program with persistent funding” and that a sustained program “will not be viable under the current mission development and management practices.”  Indeed, despite the successful launch of Landsat 8 just six months ago, the committee stressed that it has only a 5 year design life and no money has been appropriated yet to build a replacement capability:  “it is clear that the continuation of the Landsat program is once again in jeopardy.” 

The statement has added significance in light of the deep cuts to NASA’s FY2014 Earth science budget request recommended by the House Science, Space and Technology (SS&T) Committee and the House Appropriations Committee in their versions of NASA’s new authorization (H.R. 2687) and appropriations (H.R. 2787) bills.  The authorization bill would cut Earth science funding by about 30 percent; the appropriations bill would cut it by about 10 percent.   House SS&T Space Subcommittee chairman Steven Palazzo (R-MS) said the action “prevents other agencies from using NASA as a piggy bank for projects they can’t afford, or can’t justify,” an apparent reference to Landsat and two NOAA programs that also were moved into NASA’s FY2014 budget request.

Pointedly remarking that “the continuity of Landsat imagery has never been ensured through the development of a sustained government program” and the 40-year continuous data record “owes more to the remarkable survival of Landsat 5 … than to careful planning,” the NRC committee outlines the key elements needed for what it calls SELIP — a Sustained and Enhanced Land Imaging Program.

Among the recommended steps is using block buys and fixed price contracting as the acquisition approach, collaborating with commercial and international partners, and streamlining the process for designing, building and launching satellites and sensors.

in short, the report  calls for a “systematic and deliberate program with the goal of continuing to collect vital data within lower, well-defined, manageable budgets” to “replace the historical pattern of chaotic programmatic support and ad hoc design and implementation of spacecraft and sensors in the Landsat series.”

 

Holdren, Bolden Praise Garver

Holdren, Bolden Praise Garver

Presidential Science Adviser John Holdren and NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden praised outgoing Deputy Administrator Lori Garver today for her dedicated service.

Garver revealed yesterday that she is leaving NASA after four years as the agency’s number two official.   Today, Bolden called her an “indispensable partner” and a “remarkable leader who has consistently shown great vision and commitment to NASA and the aerospace industry.”

Holdren, who is director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), thanked her on behalf of President Obama and himself for her “leadership, dedication and work on behalf of the American people…”

Garver reportedly is joining the Air Line Pilots Association.   Her resignation from NASA is effective September 6.

Lori Garver Leaving NASA

Lori Garver Leaving NASA

NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver announced today that she is leaving NASA effective September 6.

In an email, Garver said that she has accepted a position in the private sector outside the space industry.   NASAWatch reports that she will be joining the Air Line Pilots Association.

Garver has spent most of her career in the space business.    After serving on the staff of former astronaut and Senator John Glenn, she joined the staff of the National Space Society, rising to the position of Executive Director.  She then joined NASA as a policy adviser to Dan Goldin.   Subsequently she worked in the private sector, including as head of her own consulting company.   She was active in Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign and moved over to Barack Obama’s campaign after he won the Democratic primary.   After Obama’s election as President, she headed the transition team for NASA.  Obama nominated her to be NASA’s Deputy Administrator in 2009.  She was confirmed by the Senate that July.

Space Policy Events for the Weeks of August 5-18, 2013

Space Policy Events for the Weeks of August 5-18, 2013

It’s vacation time almost everywhere, so there are few space policy-related events coming up.  There are some, though, and we’ve combined the next two weeks in the list below.  Congress is in recess until September 9.

Tuesday, August 6

Saturday-Thursday, August 10-15

Monday-Thursday, August 12-15

Tuesday, August 13

Thursday August 15

Thursday-Sunday, August 15-18

Friday-Sunday, August 16-18

  • DC-X +20
    • August 16, Spaceport America Virgin Galactic Gateway, Truth or Consequences, NM
    • August 17-18, New Mexico Museum of Space History, Alamagordo, NM

 

 

Kathy Sullivan Nominated as NOAA Administrator

Kathy Sullivan Nominated as NOAA Administrator

Former astronaut Kathy Sullivan was nominated by President Obama yesterday to become Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and the new administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).  She has been serving as NOAA’s acting administrator since Jane Lubchenco left in February.

Sullivan is best known in space policy circles as the first American woman to conduct a spacewalk on STS-41G in October 1984.  She flew on two other space shuttle missions in 1990 (STS-31) and 1992 (STS-45).  While an astronaut, she also served as a member of the 1985-1986 National Commission on Space that laid out a 50-year plan for the U.S. civil space program.

An oceanographer by training, she was NOAA’s Chief Scientist from 1993-1996, and returned to the agency in 2011 as its Deputy Administrator and Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Environmental Observation and Prediction.    In between, she was director of Ohio’s Center of Science and Industry and then director of the Battelle Center for Mathematics and Science Education Policy in the John Glenn School of Public Affairs at Ohio State University.  She has a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from UC-Santa Cruz and a Ph.D. in geology from Dalhousie University in Canada.

Her nomination is subject to Senate confirmation, which will have to await Congress’s return from its August recess, which begins today.

T-HUD Lands With a Thud in the Senate, Too

T-HUD Lands With a Thud in the Senate, Too

A day after the House pulled its version of the Transportation-HUD (T-HUD) appropriations bill from the floor, the Senate also threw in the towel.  After debating the bill for more than a week, a vote to invoke cloture failed 54-43.  Congress will now leave town for its summer recess without any FY2014 appropriations bill having cleared both chambers.

The bill funds the Department of Transportation, including its Office of Commercial Space Transportation, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.  In total, it provides $54 billion, substantially more than the $44 billion in its House counterpart. 

House Republican leaders pulled their bill from the floor yesterday because they did not have enough support in their own party to pass it because of the low level of funding.   In the Senate, Republicans prevented that version from being brought to a vote because it has too much funding.

The road ahead for congressional approval of any funding bill for FY2014, which begins on October 1, is murky.