Category: Civil

Senate Intelligence Committee Recommends Relaxing Commercial Satellite Imagery Limits – UPDATE

Senate Intelligence Committee Recommends Relaxing Commercial Satellite Imagery Limits – UPDATE

UPDATE, November 15, 2013The report (S. Rept. 113-120) to accompany the bill (S. 1681) is now available.  The committee “encourages” the GEOINT functional manager and the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to “promptly review” a licensing request by “a commercial data provider” (i.e. DigitalGlobe) to collect and sell imagery with 0.25 meter resolution instead of 0.5 meter as currently allowed.  It also “directs” the DNI and Secretary of Defense to conduct an analysis of which national and military intelligence missions can be met with commerclal imagery, whether long-term (10 years or more) agreements with commercial providers is more cost effective than future government owned systems, and a risk/benefit analysis of commercial imagery.

ORIGINAL STORY, November 7, 2013:  The Senate Intelligence Committee marked up its FY2014 Intelligence Authorization bill on Tuesday.  In the report accompanying the bill, the committee recommends relaxation of restrictions on the resolution of satellite imagery sold by U.S. companies.

A committee press release states that it also calls for a review “to determine the appropriate role of commercial satellite imagery in fulfilling intelligence requirements.”

Details of precisely what the language recommends will not be known publicly until the report is released next week according to a spokesman for committee chairwoman Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA).  Brian Weiss, reached by email today, said “There is language in the unclassified report to accompany the bill,” which should be posted on the committee’s website “early next week.”  The bill itself is already posted there, but does not mention commercial satellite imagery.

The bill authorizes funding for U.S. intelligence agencies; commercial satellite imagery is a small part of its scope.  The committee agreed to the bill by a vote of 13-2.

The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) had contracts with two companies, GeoEye and DigitalGlobe, over a decade to provide commercial satellite imagery to the government.  The most recent contract is called EnhancedView.   Last year, NGA decided it could not support two companies any longer and chose DigitalGlobe to continue receiving payments under EnhancedView.   DigitalGlobe later bought GeoEye.

Commercial satellite imagery with better than 0.5 meter resolution currently cannot be sold, even though the satellites may obtain imagery with higher resolution.  DigitalGlobe has been trying to obtain permission to sell imagery with resolution as good as 0.25 meter.  NOAA is responsible for regulating commercial satellite imagery companies.

Feinstein Introduces Bill to Rename Dryden FRC After Neil Armstrong

Feinstein Introduces Bill to Rename Dryden FRC After Neil Armstrong

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced a bill last week to rename NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC) after Neil Armstrong.  The House passed a similar bill in February, but there has been no action in the Senate so far.

The bill, S. 1636, was introduced October 31, 2013 and referred to the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee.  It is identical to H.R. 667, introduced by House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and passed by the House on February 25.   That bill in turn is identical to a bill (H.R. 6612) that passed the House on December 31, 2012, but time ran out on the 112th Congress without any Senate action.

The bills honor Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the Moon, who died in August 2012.   DFRC, at Edwards Air Force Base, CA, is currently named after Hugh Dryden, Director of NASA’s predecessor, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), and NASA’s first deputy administrator.  Both bills would also rename NASA’s Western Aeronautical Test Range (WATF) after Dryden.

In a statement introducing the bill, Feinstein said renaming the DFRC after Armstrong was “fitting” because it is located at the “base where his career literally took off,” and changing the name of WATF would be a “tribute to Dr. Dryden’s enduring legacy.”

Bolden Praises Kepler Team; Looks Forward to NASA Science, Exploration Working Together

Bolden Praises Kepler Team; Looks Forward to NASA Science, Exploration Working Together

NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden praised the Kepler Space Telescope team yesterday and used their findings to illustrate the future he sees of NASA’s space science and human spaceflight efforts working more closely together.

Results from Kepler are being revealed this week at the Kepler II science conference at NASA’s Ames Research Center.  Kepler scientists are searching for “exoplanets” — planets orbiting other stars.    Scientists combing through three years of Kepler data have confirmed the existence of 187 planets and identified 3,538 “candidate” planets — meaning initial data suggest a planet is there, but it has not been confirmed by additional research.  Overall, they conclude that “most stars in our galaxy have at least one planet.”

The goal is finding planets that are similar to Earth where life may exist.   Scientists describe a “habitable zone” around stars where conditions are favorable for life as we know it and hope to find planets within that zone of the right size and composition to support life.   At the first Kepler science conference two years ago, the first confirmed planet within a star’s habitable zone was announced — Kepler-22b.    Since then four more have been confirmed.  On Monday, scientists announced that data from Kepler suggests that 20 percent of stars like the Sun have Earth-sized (no more than twice the size of Earth) planets in the habitable zone.

In a video posted yesterday, Bolden heralded the Kepler discoveries as exemplifying how NASA helps provide an understanding of the universe and “why we need to continue to push the boundaries of exploration.”   He goes on to discuss other NASA robotic science missions — Juno, New Horizons, MAVEN — and ties them to NASA’s human space exploration activities.  “As NASA plans missions to an asteroid and Mars, and just marked 13 years of continuous habitation aboard the International Space Station, we’re learning to live and work off planet for the long term.  We’re working hard to revolutionize humanity’s ability to reach and live in other places … and these Kepler findings are a fascinating reminder that there may be other worlds like ours….”  

Bolden ends by saying “with our steady and strategic investments in science, technology and human exploration, we continue to build a space program that leads the world in scientific discovery and technology.  I congratulate the Kepler team … and look forward to science and exploration working together to help NASA write the next chapter of the human experience.”

Historically, NASA’s robotic space science efforts and human spaceflight program have often seemed at cross purposes.   Many scientists eschew human exploration as excessively expensive and risky, diverting money from what they consider to be important research.   Human exploration advocates often view space science as valuable, but insufficient to fulfill the human desire to explore new worlds in person rather than through robotic surrogates.   Bolden, a former astronaut, has made bridge-building between these two facets of the space community a high priority since he became Administrator four years ago.

 

 

 

Soyuz TMA-11M Crew Launches to ISS with Olympic Torch – UPDATE

Soyuz TMA-11M Crew Launches to ISS with Olympic Torch – UPDATE

UPDATE, November 7, 2013:   The Soyuz TMA-11M crew docked at 5:27 am Eastern Standard Time.

ORIGINAL STORY, November 6, 2013: Soyuz TMA-11M launched on time at 11:14 pm Eastern Standard Time (EST) tonight, November 6 (10:14 am November 7 local time at the launch site in Kazakhstan).   The crew is taking the expedited route to the International Space Station (ISS) with docking in just about six hours.

The three crew members are NASA’s Rick Mastracchio, Japan’s Koichi Wakata, and Russia’s Mikhail Tyurin.  Wakata will become the first Japanese astronaut to command the ISS later in his mission.

These three crew members will join six crew already aboard the ISS: the Soyuz TMA-09M crew (Karen Nyberg, Luca Parmitano and Fyodor Yurchikhin) and the Soyuz TMA-10M crew (Oleg Kotov, Michael Hopkins, and Sergey Ryazanskiy).  

The Olympic torch that is on its way to the Winter Games in Sochi, Russia is aboard Soyuz TMA-11M.   Kotov and Ryazanskiy will make a spacewalk with the torch on Saturday, and it then will be returned to Earth on Sunday by the Soyuz TMA-09M crew.

Docking is scheduled for 5:31 am EST tomorrow morning (November 7).

 

India's First Mars Mission Off to a Good Start

India's First Mars Mission Off to a Good Start

India successfully launched its first mission to Mars early this morning.  The Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM) is now in Earth orbit and will conduct a series of orbit raising maneuvers before setting off on the journey to Mars on December 1.

The mission, also called Mangalyaan, lifted off from India’s Sriharikota launch site at 4:08 am Eastern Standard Time (EST) today (2:48 pm Indian Standard Time, which is 10 hours 30 minutes ahead of EST) aboard India’s Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV).  Arrival at Mars is expected September 24, 2014. 

MOM is primarily a technology demonstration mission to prove that India can get a spacecraft to Mars, but it also carries five scientific instruments, including one that will search for methane in the Martian atmosphere.

The United States, Soviet Union/Russia and Europe have all successfully placed spacecraft into Martian orbit.  A Japanese Mars probe launched in 1998 (Nozomi) suffered several failures along the way and did not achieve Mars orbit.  A small Chinese satellite (Yinghuo-1) piggybacked on a Russian Mars probe launched in 2011, but that spacecraft, Phobos-Grunt, failed to leave Earth orbit and reentered. 

If this mission succeeds, India thus will become the first Asian country to place a spacecraft in orbit around Mars, but as every country that has attempted this feat knows, it’s a long treacherous journey and launch is merely one step.

Hertz Paints Bleak Near-Term Outlook for NASA Astrophysics Division if Sequester Continues

Hertz Paints Bleak Near-Term Outlook for NASA Astrophysics Division if Sequester Continues

NASA Astrophysics Division Director Paul Hertz painted a bleak picture of NASA’s FY2014 astrophysics budget today and forecast a future filled with uncertainty.  The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) may be secure, but the rest of NASA’s astrophysics program could have tough sailing ahead.

Hertz stressed that the country spends quite a bit of money on NASA’s astrophysics portfolio – a total of $1.3 billion “and you can’t plead poverty when there’s $1.3 billion on the table.”  Roughly half of that is for JWST, however, which is managed separately from the rest of NASA’s astrophysics programs.

Hertz manages NASA’s Astrophysics Division (APD), everything except JWST.   APD includes operations of existing space telescopes (Hubble, Spitzer, Chandra, Kepler and Fermi), astrophysics Explorer missions (Astro-H, NICER, and TESS), suborbital (balloon and airborne) missions, and development of future missions.  While he was speaking to the National Research Council’s Committee on Astronomy and Astrophysics (CAA), new findings from Kepler were being announced at the Kepler Science Conference II.

Congress appropriated $659 million for APD in FY2013, Hertz said, but that was reduced by $42 million because of sequestration and rescissions.   By contrast, JWST is an agency priority and was spared any cuts; other parts of NASA’s science budget had to make up the difference, he noted.

On paper, Hertz’s current budget is $642 million (the President’s FY2014 request) of which about $14 million is for institutional costs, leaving $628 million for science “content” – performing scientific research using instruments aboard suborbital and orbital platforms and analyzing the resulting data.  In reality, NASA is now funded under a Continuing Resolution (CR) that lasts until January 15, 2014.  Hertz said that if the agency is kept at that level for all of FY2014, he will have to cut 6.5 percent (about $35 million) from the $628 million, which could rise to 10 percent (about $50 million) if the sequester remains in place.

CAA provides strategic advice on science priorities for astronomy and astrophysics programs at NASA and the National Science Foundation.   Hertz told the committee that he is always looking for good advice on how to manage his budget most effectively, especially in these constrained circumstances.

CAA member Tom Young, a retired industry executive often called upon to lead studies of why government space programs go awry and former director of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, commented that the overall problem is that “there is too much program” for NASA’s budget.  He believes NASA should anticipate getting total funding in the $16-17 billion range.   

At that level, he argued, a decision needs to be made to eliminate “a thing” from the NASA portfolio or to fund everything at a “malnutrition” level.    Hertz rejoined that if he knew for certain that his APD budget would be reduced by 10 percent for many years, he would make choices with out-year budget savings, but the administration’s guidance is that this is a temporary situation and the sequester will not remain in force.  It is very different, he said, to make decisions based on “a one year cut and a forever cut.”

Young reiterated that “cuts will happen” and the only question is how the cut is distributed.  While acknowledging that Young might be correct, Hertz added “that’s not what I hear.”

Other notable points from presentations by Hertz and JWST Acting Program Director Eric Smith included:

  • NASA will not implement the reorganization of government STEM education programs proposed in the President’s FY2014 budget request.  However, the funding was removed from NASA’s science programs in the FY2014 budget request, so now it must be found somewhere else within NASA’s science program.
  • JWST remains on schedule despite the 16-day government shutdown; though some tests were delayed, the program has 14 months of schedule reserve, so the October 2018 launch date is unaffected.
  • NASA continues to plan for a new large astrophysics mission after JWST using the NRC’s Decadal Survey as guidance.  The NRC recommended a Wide-Field Infrared Space Telescope (WFIRST) and NASA is assessing whether 2.4 meter telescopes given to NASA by the National Reconnaissance Office can be used to implement that mission cost effectively (a concept called AFTA).  However, APD cannot be sure decision-makers will agree to another large mission and therefore has created Science Definition Teams for a couple of medium-sized missions so those concepts are ready instead if needed.
  • If the sequester remains in place, the estimated FY2014 budget for all of NASA would be $16.25 billion, compared to the $17.7 billion request.
  • The APD program was affected by the government shutdown in a number of ways:
    • The 2013-2014 Antarctic Long Duration Balloon campaign was cancelled
    • The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) aircraft-based astronomy platform cancelled 9 science flights with U.S. experiments
    • An instrument for the NASA-JAXA Astro-H mission could not be tested, resulting in a 5-week delay in its shipment to Japan for integration into the spacecraft and increased costs
    • Other projects had schedule hits including a one-month delay for the ISS-CREAM experiment
    • There will be delays in sending out research funding
Space Policy Events for the Week of November 4-10, 2013

Space Policy Events for the Week of November 4-10, 2013

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead (plus a bit, this week’s list goes through Sunday, November 10).  The House is not in session this week; the Senate is in session.

During the Week

The Kepler Science Conference II takes place this week at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, CA.   The conference was always expected to produce fireworks in terms of its exoplanet discoveries, but this one also created quite a furor when Chinese scientists were not allowed to attend because of NASA/Ames’ interpretation of restrictions on Chinese visitors to NASA facilities.   It said no Chinese were allowed because of a law sponsored by Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), Wolf publicly rebuked the agency in the middle of the government shutdown saying it was not because of the law, NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden — one of the few NASA employees who was still allowed to work (because he’s a political appointee) said he’d review the situation when the government reopened, and subsequently the decision was made that the Chinese scientists could reapply to attend.   It will be interesting to see how many were able to get through the approval process and obtain visas in order to be there.

Another notable event this week is the launch of the Soyuz TMA-11M crew (Mastracchio, Wakata, Tyurin).  They will bring the Olympic torch with them to the International Space Station.  When they dock on Thursday morning, there will be three three-person crews aboard the ISS — a total of nine people instead of the usual six.   On Saturday, two Russian cosmonauts (Kotov, Ryazanskiy) will do a spacewalk and take the torch with them to the outside of the ISS and on Sunday the Soyuz TMA-09M crew (Nyberg, Parmitano, Yurchikhin) will return to Earth with the torch and it will continue its journey to the Winter Games in Sochi, Russia.

Those and the other events we know of as of Sunday afternoon (November 3) are listed below.

Monday, November 4

Monday-Friday, November 4-8

Monday-Tuesday, November 4-5

Tuesday, November 5

Tuesday-Wednesday, November 5-6

Wednesday-Thursday, November 6-7

Thursday, November 7

Thursday-Friday, November 7-8

Thursday-Sunday, November 7-10

Saturday, November 9

Sunday, November 10

 

Correction:  An earlier version of this article mistakenly stated that the Space Studies Board meeting November 7-8 was at the NRC’s Beckman Center in Irvine, CA.  It is in Washington, DC at the National Academy of Sciences building on Constitution Avenue.

NOAA To Respond to Satellite Task Group Report

NOAA To Respond to Satellite Task Group Report

NOAA is set to respond to last year’s report on its satellite programs by the Satellite Task Force of the NOAA Science Advisory Board (SAB) at an SAB meeting November 19. The SAB Satellite Task Force (SATTF) report was one of three issued last year that critiqued NOAA’s management of its weather satellite programs.

draft of the SATTF report was released for public comment last fall and the final report issued in December.  Among its eight key recommendations were that NOAA should advocate for a stable funding and management environment for the satellite programs within NOAA and conduct an analysis of five alternative architectures for the future of U.S. civil weather satellite systems.

One of the other reports last year was from an Independent Review Team (IRT) headed by Tom Young, a veteran retired industry executive often called upon to lead reviews of government space programs that go awry. His report last year called oversight of NOAA’s satellite programs by NOAA and its parent, the Department of Commerce, “dysfunctional.”   Mary Kicza, NOAA Assistant Administrator for the National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), told the National Research Council’s (NRC’s) Committee on Earth Science and Applications from Space (CESAS) on Tuesday that the IRT also will report out this month with its assessment of NOAA’s response to that report.  

NOAA is responsible for the nation’s two civil weather satellite systems, one of which is in polar orbit and the other in geostationary orbit.   NOAA is trying to dispel an image of poor management of those programs, especially its role in the failed tri-agency National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) program.   Criticism also has been levied at its management of the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES)-R series and the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) that replaced NOAA’s portion of NPOESS.

The life cycle cost estimate for JPSS started at $11.9 billion for four satellites — two JPSS satellites plus two free-flyers to accommodate instruments that were planned for NPOESS but cannot fit on the smaller JPSS spacecraft.   The estimate then rose to $12.9 billion — NOAA said because it added four more years of operations — triggering congressional alarm.  In the FY2014 budget request, NOAA lowered the estimate to $11.3 billion by discontinuing plans for one of the free-flyers, moving the remaining one to a separate line item in the budget, and transferring responsibility for several “climate” (as compared to “weather”) sensors to NASA.  (NASA earth science division director told the NRC CESAS meeting that NASA was given a one-year increase of $40 million to pay for those climate sensors, while NOAA estimated their cost in the “high $200 to low $300 millions.”)

At the NRC CESAS meeting, Kicza portrayed both JPSS and GOES-R as in good shape today at least in part because Congress appears finally to understand the need for these satellites.  The Continuing Resolution (CR) under which the government is currently operating directs NOAA to spend its funds so as to ensure the launch dates for the first JPSS and GOES-R do not slip.  The downside is that the agency was not given more money, so funds to keep those programs on track will have to come from somewhere else, such as NOAA’s other satellite programs, DSCOVR and Jason-3.

Still, Kicza said NOAA is “thankful” for the “clear recognition” for the need for weather satellites and the “tough love” from external reviewers — like SATTF and IRC.

The five architectures the SATTF asked NOAA to evaluate are:

  • Continue JPSS and GOES-R architecture,
  • Pursue new multi-sensor satellites,
  • Establish a hybrid of current polar and geostationary satellites,
  • Investigate a federated architecture with defined missions for individual partners, and
  • Develop a new distributed architecture

Senate Confirms FCC Nominees After Holds Are Lifted

Senate Confirms FCC Nominees After Holds Are Lifted

Today the Senate confirmed the nominations of two new members of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), including a new chairman, after two Senators lifted their holds.

Thomas Wheeler was confirmed to be the new FCC chairman, filling a Democratic slot, while Michael O’Rielly was confirmed to fill a Republican slot.  With their confirmations, the FCC leadership is now back to full strength.   The FCC has five commissioners, three from the party of the President and two from the other party.

The Hill newspaper reports that the votes to confirm the nominations today were unanimous.

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) was blocking Wheeler’s confirmation because he does not want the FCC to increase requirements to identify sponsors of political ads.  In a statement this afternoon, Cruz said that Wheeler conveyed that “he had heard the unambiguous message” that trying to impose such additional requirements required congressional action and was not a decision for the FCC to make unilaterally.

Separately, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) vowed yesterday that he would block all nominations until the Obama Administration released more information about the survivors of the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi last year.   He allowed the vote today reportedly because the nominations predated his hold.

A single Senator can block the confirmation of any nominee by placing a hold on the nomination for any reason.

The FCC regulates use of the electromagnetic spectrum by the private sector, including for commercial communications satellites, as well as orbital slots for those satellites in geostationary orbit.

A Last Chance to Tell the NRC *YOUR* Ideas for Human Spaceflight — Via Twitter

A Last Chance to Tell the NRC *YOUR* Ideas for Human Spaceflight — Via Twitter

The National Research Council’s (NRC’s) Committee on Human Spaceflight is offering everyone a last chance to provide their ideas on the future of the human spaceflight program via a Twitter chat tomorrow, October 29, 2013.

This is the first time the NRC is using social media to obtain input from the public.   Anyone who wants to participate should tweet their ideas using the hashtag #humansinspace.

Input will be accepted during a 27 hour period on October 29 — from midnight Eastern Daylight Time through the next midnight Pacific Daylight Time. 

The NRC solicited ideas from the public this summer; they are available on the NRC’s website.   This is a final opportunity for the public to participate as the committee nears the end of its deliberations. 

This time the NRC is asking for responses to the question:  What are your best ideas for creating a NASA human spaceflight program that is sustainable over the next several decades.

The NRC is hoping to stimulate “a rapid exchange of ideas” among participants.   Be sure to use the #humansinspace hashtag.