Category: Civil

NOAA Satellites Lead to Rescues of 263 People in 2012

NOAA Satellites Lead to Rescues of 263 People in 2012

NOAA’s satellites are best known for their role in forecasting the weather, but they also carry transponders for the international Search and Rescue Satellite-Aided Tracking System, Cospas-Sarsat.   NOAA announced today that the system led to the rescues of 263 people in the United States and surrounding waters during 2012.

The Cospas-Sarsat system dates back to 1979 when the Soviet Union, United States, Canada and France teamed up to create a global system to locate people in distress.   Soviet COSPAS navigation satellites and U.S. polar-orbiting weather satellites initiallly hosted the space-based transponders.  The first U.S. rescue using the system was in 1982.  The 30th anniversary of that event was celebrated last year.  

More than 30,000 people worldwide have been rescued over the decades, of which about 7,000 were in the United States. Forty two other countries and organizations have joined the original four sponsors of the system.  Today, transponders are carried on NOAA’s polar-orbiting and geostationary weather satellites, European polar-orbiting and geostationary weather satellites, and Russian geostationary weather and data relay satellites.

Of the 263 people rescued in or near the United States in 2012 announced by NOAA today, 182 were rescued from the water, 22 from aviation incidents, and 59 from situations on land.   Alaska had the most (45), followed by North Carolina (38) and Florida (25).

McNutt Resigns as Head of USGS, But Will Stay Till After Landsat 8 Launches

McNutt Resigns as Head of USGS, But Will Stay Till After Landsat 8 Launches

Marcia McNutt, Director of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), announced her resignation on Friday, but said she would stay until Landsat 8 is launched in February.

USGS operates the Landsat satellites and is responsible for data archiving and distribution.  It recently announced the decommissioning of the venerable Landsat 5 satellite, making Landsat 7 the only operational satellite in the system.  

However, on February 11, the next in the series, Landsat 8 (also called the Landsat Data Continuity Mission), is scheduled for launch aboard an Atlas V from Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA.  Assuming it operates successfully, it will extend the existing 40 year data set of medium resolution land imagery begun in 1972 with NASA’s Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 (ERTS-1).

Photo credit:  USGS website

McNutt said in a letter to employees that she would resign as of February 15, “timing my departure so that I can witness the launch of Landsat 8 … a very significant event for USGS, and after that ride off into the western sunset.”  She expressed regret at leaving, saying that “if it just weren’t for the fact that this job is 2000 miles away from my family and my home, I would be pleased to stay on as long as I was invited to do so.”   The San Diego Reader posted the letter and speculated that McNutt may be headed back to San Diego to become the new head of the Scripps Institute of Oceanography, where she earned her doctorate in earth sciences.

McNutt has been working with colleagues at NASA and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) to determine what comes next for the Landsat program.   USGS hoped to take over the program entirely, with NASA as its acquisition agent, but Congress said no, worried that the cost of the program might negatively impact other USGS priorities.   The agencies and the White House have been working on a resolution to the quandary and there is speculation that the FY2014 budget request might reveal the new plan.   It now seems unlikely that the budget request will be submitted to Congress before McNutt leaves, however.  The National Research Council (NRC) also is conducting a study at the request of USGS on how to implement a sustainable land remote sensing satellite program; the report is expected to be released in March 2013.

The American Geosciences Institute tweets (@agigap) that Suzette Kimball will become Acting Director and Bill Werkheiser will be Acting Deputy Director. 

White House Confirms FY2014 Budget Request Will be Late, But Not How Late

White House Confirms FY2014 Budget Request Will be Late, But Not How Late

One of the worst kept secrets in Washington in the past couple of weeks has been that the Obama Administration will miss the February 4, 2013 deadline for submitting its FY2014 budget request to Congress.  By law, the request should be submitted on the first Monday in February.  It has been clear for weeks that could not happen, but the White House declined to make the delay official until now.

On Friday, however, acting Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Jeffrey Zients told House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) that it would not be submitted on schedule.   He did not say when it would be released, however.  Widespread rumors are that it will not be ready until March.

A House aide was quoted by The Hill newspaper as complaining this is the fourth time in five years that the budget request will be late.   He failed to note that Congress has not completed its work on a budget by its legal deadline, October 1 (when new fiscal years begin), in recent memory.  In fact, the budget for the current fiscal year, FY2013, remains in limbo.  The government is currently operating under a Continuing Resolution (CR) that, in general, funds agencies at their FY2012 levels.  The CR lasts until March 27, half way through the fiscal year, meaning that agencies will have to cope with whatever spending changes are required in the span of just 6 months rather than 12.

With resolution of the sequester, the debt limit, and FY2013 funding still up in the air, it is no surprise that the executive branch is having trouble formulating the budget request for the future, never mind sorting out how to handle the rest of this fiscal year.

Deputy Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter issued a memo last week entitled “Handling Budget Uncertainty in Fiscal Year 2013” instructing the department on how to prepare for the possibility that the CR will be extended for the entirety of FY2013.  “Because most operating funding was planned to increase from Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 to FY2013, but is instead being held at FY2012 levels under the CR, funds will run short at current rates of expenditure if the CR continues through the end of the fiscal year in its current form,” according to a copy of the memo posted by the publication Government Executive.

Meantime, Politico reports that some House Republicans, including House Republican Conference Chairwoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), are “seriously entertaining dramatic steps” including a government shutdown to demonstrate their insistence that government spending be cut.   The Congressional Research Service (CRS) has a useful report on government shutdowns, including an explanation of the twin shutdowns in 1995 and 1996 when House Republicans under the leadership of then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich and President Bill Clinton clashed over spending and the debt limit.  First was a 5-day shutdown between November 13-19, 1995, and then a 21-day shutdown between December 15, 1995 and January 6, 1996.  The latter is the longest government shutdown on record.

The ominous political clouds on the horizon make the New Year’s Eve “fiscal cliff” debate seem like a cakewalk.  On New Year’s Eve, Congress punted on the sequester, simply delaying it for two months – to March 1.  The United States already hit the $16.4 trillion debt ceiling and the Treasury is paying bills with money that it should be putting in federal employee retirement accounts and other such “emergency” measures.   They expect to exhaust those methods by the end of February.   The President today demanded that Congress increase the debt limit, but some House Republicans are threatening to let the government default, though others prefer the government shutdown path.

In such an environment, it is hardly surprising that the request for FY2014 will be late.

Events of Interest: Week of January 14-19, 2013 – UPDATE

Events of Interest: Week of January 14-19, 2013 – UPDATE

UPDATE:  Adds the meeting of NASA’s Small Bodies Assessment Group (think asteroids, comets, NEOs) Monday-Wednesday.

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead.  The House will in session Monday-Wednesday; the Senate is in recess until the inauguration on Monday, the 21st.

Monday-Wednesday, January 14-16

Tuesday, January 15

Wednesday, January 16

Thursday, January 17

Friday, January 18

Rockefeller to Retire

Rockefeller to Retire

Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, announced today that he will not run for reelection in 2014.  The committee has jurisdiction over policy and funding authorizations for NASA and NOAA.

Rockefeller, 75, is the last of his family’s political dynasty currently in office.  A former two-term governor of West Virginia, he was first elected to the Senate in 1984.

His home state concerns have little to do with the space program, although NASA’s Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) facility is located there.  While he has not been an opponent of the space program, he also has not been an enthusiastic supporter.  

Rockefeller began the July 8, 2009 nomination hearing for NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden and Deputy Administrator Lori Garver by asking them to address what they would do to fix all the problems at NASA.  “What do you propose to do, each of you … to take what was the inspiration of the nation, which is not today the inspiration of the nation, it is not and it needs to be in order to hold its place and to get proper funding.  It’s drifted.  I think that’s indisputable.  So what do you plan to do to change this posture?”

The question clearly surprised and temporarily stumped the two nominees.  Rockefeller later complained they had not addressed the question and asked it again.  “I characterized NASA as adrift, more a splendid story of the past. …. how are you going to reinvigorate the agency … because NASA has to be earned each year.  NASA is not a given.  No agency is a given.”

Apart from that one hearing, Rockefeller has not been in the forefront of NASA issues, leaving them to be worked by Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL), who chairs the science and space subcommittee, and the now-retired Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), who served as ranking member of the full committee.  The Senate Republican Conference has not officially named a replacement for Hutchison as ranking member.

White House Says No to Death Star

White House Says No to Death Star

Paul Shawcross, Branch Chief for Science and Space at the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), accepted the challenge to respond to the “We the People” petition to build a Death Star.

The Obama White House initiated the We the People petition opportunities to make the White House more accessible to the people.  Anyone 13 or older can petition the White House for action on a range of topics and if 25,000 signatures are obtained within 30 days, the White House promises a response.

Most of the topics are serious, but someone proposed that the United States begin construction of a Death Star by 2016, a reference to the fictional super-weapon in the Star Wars movies.

Shawcross, often criticized for any White House budget decision that doesn’t go NASA’s way, authored the response and shows that OMB does, in fact, have a sense of humor.  The semi-serious riposte, entitled “This Isn’t the Petition Response You’re Looking For,” says that a Death Star isn’t in the cards not only because of its phenomenal cost — Shawcross links to a Lehigh University estimate that it would cost $852,000,000,000,000,000 — but because the administration does not support blowing up planets or building super-weapons that are so easily vulnerable to destruction.

More seriously, he points to the reality that we have an International Space Station, two robots — one laser-wielding — on Mars, two spacecraft on their way out of the solar system (Voyager 1 and 2), and a myriad of other nifty space activities ongoing.

Shawcross ends by encouraging readers to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields and then “the Force will be with us!”

 

No Outer Planets Flagship Mission on Horizon, but Planetary R&A OK Says NASA's Jim Green

No Outer Planets Flagship Mission on Horizon, but Planetary R&A OK Says NASA's Jim Green

NASA’s Planetary Science Division Director (PSD) Jim Green reiterated today that the agency’s anticipated budget for the foreseeable future cannot accommodate a “flagship” mission to the outer planets, but that does not mean the outer planets science community should stop making the case for one.   He also insisted that funding for research and analysis (R&A) in the PSD budget is healthy, but he is open to suggestions on how best to manage it.

Green spoke to NASA’s Outer Planets Assessment Group (OPAG), which is meeting in Atlanta, GA.   The planetary science program suffered a dramatic 21 percent cut to its budget in the President’s FY2013 budget request, causing great consternation in the U.S. and international planetary science communities.   The headline from that cut focused on NASA’s subsequent withdrawal from planned cooperation with the European Space Agency on two Mars missions, but the outer planets community also was sharply impacted. 

The “outer planets” are those past the asteroid belt — Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune — and includes investigations of their moons and Pluto.  Pluto was recategorized as a “dwarf planet” by the International Astronomical Union in 2006, but some still argue that it is a planet.  At today’s OPAG meeting, NASA’s Curt Niebur pointed out that a fifth moon of Pluto has been discovered and exclaimed “If you’ve got five moons, there’s no way you’re not a planet.”

NASA has one operating outer planets mission — Cassini, which is studying Saturn and its moons — and two on their way:  New Horizons, which will arrive at Pluto in 2015, and Juno, which will arrive at Jupiter in 2016.   All three will complete their missions by 2017, so the outer planets community is obviously concerned about its future thereafter.

Green and Niebur pointed out that NASA will cooperate with the European Space Agency (ESA) on its JUpiter ICy moons Explorer (JUICE) mission that will orbit Jupiter, making flybys of its moons Callisto and Europa, and then move into orbit around Jupiter’s moon Ganymede.   It is scheduled for launch in 2022 and arrival in the Jovian system in 2030, insertion into Ganymede’s orbit in 2032, and will end its mission by impacting Ganymede in 2033.  It is an ESA mission, to which NASA will make a payload contribution of up to $100 million.

Apart from that, however, there is nothing on the books for the outer planets community.  Green had no words of encouragement at today’s meeting.  In fact, he clarified PSD’s current funding situation.   The government is operating under a Continuing Resolution (CR), which, in general, funds agencies at their previous year’s level.   For FY2012, PSD received $1.5 billion, but the FY2013 request was only $1.2 billion.  Green said that the agency is proceeding as though Congress approved the President’s budget request and therefore he is spending as though he will have $1.2 billion for FY2013, not the $1.5 billion in FY2012.  The CR runs through March 27, 2013, half of the fiscal year, so roughly half of the $1.2 billion is available for spending through that time period.  What Congress will do for the rest of FY2013 and future years is very much up in the air, with the sequester still looming along with a fight over the debt limit.

Green said he is trying to formulate a planetary science program that is consistent with the 2011 National Research Council’s Decadal Survey for planetary science despite the FY2013 budget request.   That cut created three challenges:  (1) it eliminated much of the future Mars program, which had been designed to implement a sample return mission, the Decadal Survey’s top priority for large missions; (2) it lowered funding for the Discovery program of competed missions so only about half can be accomplished; and (3) it left no room for an outer planets flagship mission.  (Flagships are the most complex and therefore most expensive missions.)

NASA was allowed to reformulate its Mars program and with the recent announcement of a rover that will be launched in 2020, Green considers that problem fixed.   “We’ve solved one of them.  We’re working on the others,” he told OPAG.

Space scientists who are not working on missions often get funding for analysis of existing data, studies or early research for future missions using R&A funding.  Green acknowledged concerns that PSD did a poor job last year of managing its R&A funds.   He said he has instituted three principles to guide the distribution of R&A funds this year — program officers will assume they will get all their money rather than waiting to distribute funds until the money is in the bank; NASA promises to meet its ongoing grant commitments — proposals that are accepted will be executed; and as remaining funding is  allocated to new awards, he wants decisions made within a month after review panels meet, not many months later as happened last year.   NASA will announce which proposals were selected, which were not selected, and those that are “selectable” — meaning they meet various criteria, but funds are not currently available, although they might become available as the year progresses.

Overall, despite criticism from some in the planetary science community, Green said his R&A budget is “the healthier part” of PSD’s program.  Though selection rates for grant proposals are one in three, he said that is better than the National Science Foundation, whose selection rate runs in the 20 percent range, or the National Institutes of Health, which is in the teens.  He concluded by saying: “So will R&A be enough to manage the entire community?  Unfortunately no.  But we’re doing everything we can to maximize R&A in these difficult times.  It won’t be perfect.”

In the meantime, though an outer planets flagship mission does not seem possible, that “doesn’t mean we shouldn’t keep demonstrating the importance of it,” he continued.    He and Neibur stressed the need to educate policymakers and other stakeholders about what the planetary program is accomplishing.  “There’s no substitute for being diligent, because we’re on the hook to tell our stakeholders — the public, your neighbors, news interviews — about all that you’re doing,” Green stressed.

Niebur showed the following photo recently taken by Cassini as an example of the “oooh” factor:  “Every time we fly by [Saturn] we’re seeing something new.”

Photo credit:  NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute

NASA Safety Panel Worries About Commercial Crew Planning-Funding Disconnect

NASA Safety Panel Worries About Commercial Crew Planning-Funding Disconnect

NASA’s Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) issued its annual report yesterday.   NASA’s commercial crew program received considerable attention again this year, especially the “disconnect” between how much funding NASA requests for the program versus what Congress approves.  ASAP worries that a continued disconnect will “again drive a change to acquisition strategy, schedule, and/or safety risk.”

ASAP has previously expressed concern about NASA’s continued use of Space Act Agreements (SAAs) instead of traditional Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)-based contracts as its acquisition approach for commercial crew.  NASA’s ability to set requirements and have insight or oversight of a company’s activities is much more limited under SAAs.  NASA planned to transition to FAR-based contracts last year, but changed course when it concluded that funding uncertainties meant fixed price FAR-based contracts would not work.

In this year’s report, ASAP is worried generally about a continued gap between NASA’s planned funding and what it actually gets from Congress and insists that the two must reach consensus “to resolve this conundrum.”  In particular, however, ASAP is concerned that funding challenges will lead NASA to choose an option where the companies would fly orbital test flights with non-NASA crews that “could yield two standards of safety — one reflecting NASA requirements, and one with a higher risk set of commercial requirements.”  If NASA exercised the option, which is included in the current Commercial Crew Integrated Capability (CCiCAP) awards, ASAP says it could prematurely signal “tacit acceptance of this commercial requirements approach absent serious consideration by all the stakeholders on whether this higher level of risk is in fact in concert with national objectives.”

The report says that NASA’s commercial crew program manager assured the panel there are no plans to exercise the option, but the panel wondered why the agency would “maintain the option if it truly had no intention of using it,” calling it a “mixed message.”

ASAP was created by Congress following the 1967 Apollo fire that killed the first Apollo crew — Virgil “Gus” Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee.   By law, the panel submits its report not only to the NASA Administrator, but to the President of the Senate (who is the Vice President of the United States) and the Speaker of the House (currently Rep. John Boehner).

Colleton: In Sandy's Aftermath, Bipartisan Support Crucial for Super System of Environmental Intelligence

Colleton: In Sandy's Aftermath, Bipartisan Support Crucial for Super System of Environmental Intelligence

Hurricane Sandy proved the need for a “super system of environmental intelligence” and more than hugs between the political parties will be required to make that happen argues Nancy Colleton, President of the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES).

In concert with this week’s annual meeting of the American Meteorological Society (AMS), Colleton calls for bipartisanship in an op-ed on the Washington Post’s Capital Weather Gang blog.   President Barack Obama, a Democrat, and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a Republican, may have shared a hug after Sandy devastated parts of that state, but Colleton hopes bipartisan cooperation doesn’t stop there. 

“Both sides of the aisle must recognize the need to embark on a new era of environmental monitoring and forecasting — one that protects American lives and property, and also grows the economy in a new era of extremes,” she says. 

A top priority is to deal with the potential gap in weather satellite coverage, Colleton continues.   The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which operates the nation’s weather satellites, has been warning that the last satellite in its current series of polar-orbiting satellites may cease to function before the first in a new series is operational, creating that gap.

“The time is now for the United States to commit to sustaining and evolving its Earth monitoring capabilities into environmental intelligence,” Colleton urges.

House SS&T Committee Adds New Subcommittee, Names Subcommittee Chairs

House SS&T Committee Adds New Subcommittee, Names Subcommittee Chairs

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), the new chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology (HSS&T) Committee, revealed today that under his leadership the committee will have six instead of five subcommittees.  He also named the Representatives who will serve as chair and vice-chair of the subcommittees, as well as vice-chair of the full committee.

Smith named Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) as vice-chair of the full committee.   Rohrabacher is a strong advocate for the space program, particularly commercial space, and competed against Smith to serve as chairman.    Rep. Ralph Hall (R-TX), who had to relinquish the chairmanship of the full committee because of House Republican term limits, will be “chairman emeritus.”

The Energy and Environment subcommittee was split into two.   Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD), who chaired the subcommittee in the last Congress, now will chair the Environment subcommittee while Rep. Cynthia Loomis (R-WY) chairs the Energy Subcommittee.

Rep. Steve Palazzo (R-MS) will continue to chair the Space and Aeronautics subcommittee and Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA) will remain as chair of the Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee.

The other two subcommittees are Technology and Research.  Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) replaces Rep. Ben Quayle (R-AZ) as chair of Technology (Quayle was defeated in a Republican primary last year caused by redistricting).   Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-IN) will chair Research instead of Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL).  Brooks will be the vice-chair of the Space and Aeronautics subcommittee.  In a statement, Brooks said he was “thrilled” to serve as vice-chair of a subcommittee that is so important “to America and the Marshall Space Flight Center.”

The complete list of full and subcommittee Republican chairs and vice chairs are in the committee’s press release

Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX) was reelected as the top Democrat (“Ranking Member”) on the full committee in December.   Democratic subcommittee assignments have not been announced yet.