Category: International

Stability, Leadership Are Keys To Future Space Program, Witnesses Tell Senate Subcommittee

Stability, Leadership Are Keys To Future Space Program, Witnesses Tell Senate Subcommittee

Witnesses appearing before a Senate subcommittee last week stressed repeatedly that stability and leadership are keys to the future of the U.S. space program.   More money would be nice, they said, but stability is critical.

Steve Squyres, chair of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC), pointed to the mismatch between what NASA is being asked to accomplish by Congress and the Obama Administration versus the resources the agency is provided to meet those goals.  In particular, he is concerned about the “pay as you go” approach to funding the Space Launch System (SLS) and the Orion spacecraft.  That “can result in slow progress if funding levels are not adequate” and the low flight rate could threaten program momentum and the need to keep “flight teams sharp and mission ready.”   He also highlighted the lack of funds for the other parts of a system needed to take astronauts beyond low Earth orbit — hardware to keep crews healthy on long duration missions far from Earth and a lunar lander for “a lunar surface mission which also is to be a stepping stone to Mars.”

A lunar landing mission is not part of the Obama Administration’s plan, but Squyres apparently agrees with the late Neil Armstrong and others who insist that a return to the Moon is a necessary step in future human space exploration.  President Obama believes the next step should be a human mission to an asteroid in 2025.  His program includes no missions to land on either the Moon or Mars through the 2030s; orbiting them, yes, but not landing.

Squyres concluded that the current budget is “insufficient” to carry out the administration’s plan and identified four options to proceed:

  • keep trying to do everything “with an inadequate budget, running the risk of lengthy delays and a job poorly done”;
  • making “painful choices” about what to eliminate in order to preserve funding for higher priorities;
  • increasing the budget “although I realize that might be difficult in a constrained budgetary environment”; or
  • forging strong international partnerships.

Jim Maser, President of Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, agreed that a lunar lander will be needed “eventually,” expressing skepticism about the asteroid mission and saying that “fallback plans” are needed.    His main point, however, was the need for “an enduring vision” and a “consistent, clearly articulated budget” to execute it.  Lamenting the Obama Adminstration’s change in direction “with what appears to be limited coordination and consent from Congress” which led to Congress “being compelled to be prescriptive” in law regarding what NASA should build, he called for “an enduring stable vision … that’s set by the President in alignment with Congress and budgets in a consistent manner that enables execution over timeframes that extend beyond a single administration or congressional election cycle.”

Charles Kennel, chair of the National Research Council’s (NRC’s) Space Studies Board, also called for “consistency of vision and goals as essential to achieving leadership in space.” His testimony focused on the importance of the United States maintaining leadership, especially in space science.  The NRC just completed a series of decadal surveys on the various aspects of space and earth science, including biological and physical science research aboard the International Space Station (ISS).  Kennel said the ISS “guarantees our leadership” for a decade in human spaceflight, but asked what comes next.  Congress directed NASA to contract with the NRC in FY2012 (which ends on September 30) to conduct a study and make recommendations on the future of the human spaceflight program.   Kennel said the members of that study committee are about to be announced and will be a “distinguished” group.

Kennel and Squyres both lamented the cancellation of NASA’s cooperation with the European Space Agency (ESA) on robotic Mars exploration because of cutbacks in the FY2013 budget request.   ESA is now partnering with Russia on the 2016 and 2018 ExoMars missions instead of NASA, but financial difficulties still must be resolved.   Despite the United States leaving ESA in the lurch, the potential of international cooperation to enable achieving bold goals in space was heralded at the hearing.

Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), who is retiring at the end of this term, asked whether NASA’s mission should be more narrowly focused by moving aeronautics elsewhere, for example.   Squyres, Kennel and Maser all argued against it, pointing out that the aeronautics budget is so small it would not make much of a difference in pursuing NASA’s space activities and that aeronautics research is critically important to the nation.   Squyres, who is a planetary scientist, said that as chair of NAC he has come to learn a lot about NASA’s aeronautics program. “Disrupting the program — trying to rip it out of the place where it’s found such a good home and place it somewhere else could be detrimental to what I think is one of the best things that NASA does,” he said.

Squyres is best known as the principal investigator for the Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit and Opportunity that landed on Mars in 2004.  He also chaired the recent NRC decadal survey on planetary science.   Robotic Mars exploration was one focus of the hearing, which led off with witnesses representing the Mars Curiosity mission that landed on Mars last month.  Fuk Li, Director of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s Mars Exploration Directorate and CalTech’s John Grotzinger, Curiosity’s lead scientist, updated the subcommittee on the Curiosity mission.

Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL), chair of the subcommittee, asked about the utility of SLS for science missions.  Similar in capability to the Saturn V that sent Apollo astronauts to the Moon, the SLS will be optimized for human spaceflight missions, but Nelson asked about other missions SLS could enable.   Kennel offered that a mission to deflect an asteroid that might impact the Earth is one possibility, along with robotic sample return missions from Mars.  Squyres said that human missions to asteroids and Mars could be important from a planetary science standpoint.  He pointed out that the science that has been achieved with the Opportunity rover over eight years could have been accomplished in a week or week-and-a-half with a human crew.

The September 12 hearing was before the Science and Space subcommittee of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.    

Events of Interest: Week of September 10-16, 2012

Events of Interest: Week of September 10-16, 2012

The following events may be of interest in the coming week.   Congress returns to work this week and the space policy world resumes its usual busy pace.

During the Week

The public memorial service for Neil Armstrong at the National Cathedral in Washington, DC on Thursday will be a time for celebrating not only his life but the invigorating days of the Apollo program.  For those who cannot attend in person, NASA will carry the event live on NASA TV.

Committees in both the House and Senate will hold hearings on the future of the human spaceflight program on the days before and after Armstrong’s memorial service.   The House Science, Space and Technology Committee has hearings on Wednesday and Friday.  Wednesday’s hearing will get an update on the Space Launch System and Orion spacecraft that NASA is building to take astronauts beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO) for the first time since the end of the Apollo lunar program.  Friday’s will focus on the nearer term effort to build new crew transportation systems to LEO as essentially a public-private partnership though it is dubbed “commercial crew.”   Meanwhile, the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee will hold a hearing on Wednesday that looks at the future of both robotic and human space exploration, with leaders of the Mars Curiosity rover team, the chair of the NASA Advisory Council, the chair of the National Research Council’s Space Studies Board, and a leader of the rocket propulsion industry.

All of that is on top of a bevy of other events, including five conferences in the United States or abroad, that will keep the space policy community hopping all week.  To make it easier to use this long list, we have separated the conferences from the other events.

Last but not least, the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) should submit to Congress its report on the specifics of how a sequester would impact federal spending, including for DOD, NASA and NOAA.  The report was due last week, but White House press secretary Jay Carney said Friday it would not be released until “late next week,” but did not say exactly when.   It is sure to dampen any enthusiasm about the future of the space program that arises from the Armstrong memorial service and congressional hearings, but OMB’s point is to demonstrate the catastrophic impact a sequester would have if Congress does not act to avoid it.

SINGLE EVENTS

Wednesday, September 12

Thursday, September 13

Friday, September 14

CONFERENCES

Monday-Thursday, September 10-14

  • World Satellite Business Week, Paris, France
    • 10th Symposium on Market Forecasts (Monday)
    • 16th World Summit for Satellite Financing (Tuesday-Thursday)
    • 4th Symposium on Earth Observation Business (Thursday-Friday)

Tuesday-Thursday, September 11-13

Tuesday-Sunday, September 11-16

Thursday, September 13

Thursday-Sunday, September 13-16

 

Romney: NASA Needs Clear Priorities, Not More Money

Romney: NASA Needs Clear Priorities, Not More Money

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney provided a little more information about his plans for NASA in a written response to a question posed by ScienceDebate.org.   President Obama answered the same question allowing a side-by-side comparison of where the candidates stand on space.

Romney has been criticized for not expressing his position on the space program.   Although he praised Neil Armstrong and the Apollo program in his acceptance speech last week, there was no hint about what he would do with the space program as President.  Earlier in the campaign he complained that President Obama does not have a vision or mission for NASA and said he would turn to a group of experts from science, the commercial sector and the military to establish such a vision, but offered no specifics.

He repeated that stance In his response to the ScienceDebate.org question:  “I will bring together all the stakeholders — from NASA and other civil agencies, from the full range of national security institutions, from our leading universities, and from commercial enterprises — to set goals, identify missions, and define the pathway forward.”

Romney went slightly, though only slightly, further this time in sharing his views on NASA, saying that “A strong and successful NASA does not require more funding, it needs clearer priorities.  I will ensure NASA has practical and sustainable missions.  There will be a balance of pragmatic and top-priority science with inspirational and groundbreaking exploration programs.”  He also called for international cooperation, a “robust national security space program,” and revitalizing the aerospace industry.

Such general statements still offer little insight into what he would do differently from the Obama Administration if he wins the election.   The two most controversial aspects of the Obama civil space policy is its reliance on the private sector to build systems to take astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS) and its choice of an asteroid as the next destination for human spaceflight beyond low Earth orbit.   In his response, Romney seems to support the former, saying the “travel of citizens to and from space” is a major technical achievement conveying America’s power and values and “The success of private sector enterprises in achieving these objectives opens a new chapter in American leadership.”   He is silent on the destination question.

President Obama’s answer to the same question breaks no new ground.  He summarizes what he feels has been achieved during his presidency and restates his goals of sending astronauts to an asteroid by 2025 and to Mars in the 2030s, as well as his commitment to earth and space science programs.

The President singles out the Mars Curiosity program for special mention not only as a symbol of American leadership, but as the source of “more than 7,000 jobs in at least 31 states.”  He also heralds the space program’s role in inspiring kids to study science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) and says children are “telling their moms and dads they want to be part of a Mars mission — maybe even the first person to walk on Mars.  That’s inspiring.”

Space was one of 14 “Top American Science Questions” asked of the two candidates.  The questions were chosen from suggestions put forward by scientists, engineers and concerned citizens and vetted by about a dozen scientific and engineering societies and the National Academies.  The other questions were on these topics:

  • Innovation
  • Climate Change
  • Research and the Future
  • Pandemics and Biosecurity
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Food
  • Fresh Water
  • The Internet
  • Ocean Health
  • Science in Public Policy
  • Critical Natural Resources
  • Vaccination and Public Health
Spacewalking Duo Fixes Problem; Williams Beats Whitson for Spacewalk Duration

Spacewalking Duo Fixes Problem; Williams Beats Whitson for Spacewalk Duration

Two International Space Station (ISS) astronauts succeeded today in mounting a Main Bus Switching Unit (MBSU) to the outside of the ISS after being foiled in their attempt last week by a faulty bolt.  This was the sixth career spacewalk by NASA astronaut Suni Williams, who now holds the record for spacewalking duration by a woman.

Williams and Japanese astronaut Aki Hoshide spent 6 hours and 28 minutes on their spacewalk, the second in less than a week.   Their first venture outside the ISS, which had been scheduled for about the same length of time, ended up taking 8 hours and 17 minutes as they tried and tried and tried again to coax the bolt into its proper position.   It would not budge, however, and the spacewalkers came back inside to give ground-based colleagues a chance to troubleshoot the problem.

Today, armed with new tools and procedures, they succeeded.  They also were able to complete another task on their to-do list from last week, installing a new camera on Canadarm2, the robotic arm on ISS. 

NASA astronaut Suni Williams and Japanese

astronaut Aki Hoshide during Sept. 4, 2012

spacewalk.   Photo credit:  NASA

Williams and Hoshide were assisted by NASA astronaut Joe Acaba, who operated Canadarm2 and monitored the spacewalk from inside the ISS.   Three Russians also are aboard the ISS — Gennady Padalka, Yuri Malenchenko, and Sergei Revin.   Padalka and Malenchenko did a spacewalk earlier in the mission.

Williams now holds the record for total cumulative spacewalk time by a woman.   She has conducted a total of six spacewalks on her various missions for a total of 44 hours and 2 minutes.  That beats the previous record held by Peggy Whitson, now chief of the astronaut office.  Whitson also did six spacewalks over the course of her spaceflights for a total of 39 hours 46 minutes.   According to a list on Wikipedia of the top 30 astronauts and cosmonauts ranked by longest cumulative spacewalk durations, that puts Williams at number 17, one minute ahead of Michael Fossum and 16 minutes behind Andrew Feustel.  The record holder, Russia’s Anatoly Solovyev, has almost twice that much — 82 hours 22 minutes accumulated during 16 spacewalks.  Whitson and Williams are the only two women on the list.

Events of Interest: Weeks of September 3-16, 2012

Events of Interest: Weeks of September 3-16, 2012

This is another double issue covering two weeks:  September 3-16, 2012.  Congress continues to be in recess as Democrats will hold their presidential convention this week; the House and Senate both return on September 10.

Wednesday, September 5

Monday-Friday, September 10-14

  • World Satellite Business Week, Paris, France
    • 10th Symposium on Market Forecasts, September 10
    • 16th World Summit on Satellite Financing, September 11-13
    • 4th Symposium on Earth Observtion Business, September 13-14

Tuesday-Thursday, September 11-13

Tuesday-Sunday, September 11-16

Wednesday, September 12

Thursday, September 13

Thursday-Sunday, September 13-16

 

 

 

Putin Calls for Russian Space Industry Upgrade

Putin Calls for Russian Space Industry Upgrade

In a terse story today, Russia’s government news agency Itar-Tass reports that Russian President Vladimir Putin feels the Russian space industry structure needs “upgrading” and personnel shifts may be part of it.

According to the report, Putin asked Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin and Russian space agency (Roscosmos) head Vladimir Popovkin to make proposals along those lines.   “You may propose personnel reshuffle if necessary,” the news agency quotes Putin as saying.

Putin put Rogozin in charge of overseeing the space sector last December after a series of six failures in 12 months.  At the time, Putin was Prime Minister and Dmitry Medvedev was President.   Putin had been President previously, but was limited to two terms.  He took the Prime Minister spot while Medvedev was President and after this spring’s elections, Putin has returned to the Presidency and Medvedev is Prime Minister.  Both therefore have a long history in running the country and being aware of the growing challenges in the Russian space industry.

Russia’s usually reliable launch vehicle fleet has been suffering an unusual number of failures since December 2010.  Another failure of the Proton rocket three weeks ago created the latest calls for reform.  Proton is Russia’s largest rocket and key to Russia’s success as a global launch services provider.

The head of the Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center, which builds Proton, already resigned.  Many wonder if Popovkin’s job is safe.   Putin replaced his predecessor, Anatoly Perminov, reportedly as a result of the December 2010 Proton failure that doomed three GLONASS navigation satellites that were particularly significant as they would have completed the 24-satellite constellation, a Putin priority.  An October 2011 launch finally achieved that milestone. 

 

 

IISL Releases Moot Court Problem for 2013 Competition

IISL Releases Moot Court Problem for 2013 Competition

The International Institute of Space Law (IISL) has released the problem that forms the basis for the upcoming 2013 Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court competition.

The annual competition for law school students features four regional rounds in North America, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.  The winners of the regional rounds compete in semi-final and final competitions in conjunction with the IISL annual colloquium that is held in conjunction with the annual International Astronautical Congresses.   The 2013 collloquium will be in Beijing, China.

This year’s problem concerns legal issues that might arise by the abandonment of a lunar installation by one country and the occupation of part of that installation by another country.   More information about the Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court competition is available at the IISL’s website.

 

The Code of Conduct and the Sarlaac Pit: Podcast Now Available

The Code of Conduct and the Sarlaac Pit: Podcast Now Available

For those of you who were intrigued by Laura Delgado’s summary of last week’s Secure World Foundation (SWF)/Space Foundation panel discussion, the podcast of that meeting is now available.

Peter Marquez, former White House Director of Space Policy in the latter years of the George W. Bush Administration and early years of the Obama Administration, was one of the speakers at the event, which focused on space security and international cooperation in space.  SWF has released the podcast on its website.

Among other things, he compared the current status of development of an International Space Code of Conduct to being digested over a thousand years in the stomach of the Star Wars creature the sarlaac.   His comments on that and other issues begin at 20:26 on the recording.   Other speakers are:

Introductions

  • Brendan Curry, Vice President of Washington Operations, Space Foundation
  • Tiffany Chow, Program Manager, Secure World Foundation

Panelists:

  • Mr. Sam Black, Director of Policy, Satellite Industry Association (SIA)
  • Mr. Peter Marquez, Vice President of Strategy and Planning, Orbital, Former White House Space Policy Director
  • Ms. Jessica Powers, Director for Engagement, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Space Policy), U.S. Department of Defense
  • Mr. Frank Slazer, Vice President for Space Systems, Aerospace Industries Association (AIA)

Moderator: Victoria Samson, Washington Office Director, Secure World Foundation

NRC Kicks Off Future of Human Spaceflight Study

NRC Kicks Off Future of Human Spaceflight Study

The National Research Council (NRC) has formally kicked off the study on the future of human spaceflight that is required by the 2010 NASA Authorization Act.

Section 204 of that law (P.L. 111-267) directed NASA to contract with the NRC in FY2012 — which ends on September 30 — for a “review of the goals, core capabilities, and direction of human spaceflight.”   By law, the review is to include —

  • a broad spectrum of representation;
  • input from NASA’s international partner discussions and NASA’s Human Exploration Framework Team;
  • an examination of the relationship of national goals to foundational capabilities, robotic activities, technologies, and missions authorized in the law;
  • a review and prioritization of scientific, engineering, economic and social science questions to be addressed by human space exploration to improve the overall human condition; and
  • findings and recommendations for FY2014-2023.

The statement of task for the study, negotiated between NASA and the NRC based on the law, provides more details on what the committee is being charged to do.

The NRC’s website says it is now in the “committee nomination process.”    NRC officials have said previously that the study is expected to take 22 months once it begins, which would put its release in mid-2014.

The NRC currently has a separate study underway in response to language included in NASA’s FY2012 appropriations bill by Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) on NASA’s Strategic Direction.   That study covers all of NASA’s activities and is expected to be completed by the end of this year.

Code of Conduct is Like "Sarlacc Pit" Says Peter Marquez

Code of Conduct is Like "Sarlacc Pit" Says Peter Marquez

During a panel discussion on defense and industry perspectives on international space security and sustainability measures on Tuesday, Peter Marquez, former White House director of space policy in both the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations, said that the proposed Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities (CoC) evokes the definition of a “sarlacc,” a fictional creature from the Star Wars movies. Marquez quoted another Star Wars character, C-3PO, as saying that in the sarlacc’s Great Pit of Carkoon “you will find a new definition of pain and suffering as you are slowly digested over a thousand years.”

Marquez, now vice president of strategy and planning at Orbital Sciences Corporation, said that while the CoC may have good principles, it is already in the middle of a process with no daylight at the end of it. He cautioned against taking solely normative measures to advance space sustainability and security when these are not matched with intelligence and economic measures. Without investing in capabilities to make space secure, he said, normative security is a “space utopia.”

Marquez added that defining red lines without capabilities is “nothing but dangerous” and said that leadership is needed in this area. Referencing criticisms made about the stance of the Bush Administration regarding space security measures, Marquez agreed that it had been “absent from the international community.”  Yet he thinks that the Obama Administration’s change in tone is also insufficient; “saying yes to everything isn’t really leadership either.” “Change is easy, leadership is hard,” he said and added that Congress should also be advancing this issue.

Panelists from the Department of Defense (DoD), the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) and the Satellite Industry Association (SIA), joined Marquez in the panel discussion, which was hosted by the Secure World Foundation and the Space Foundation.

Industry representatives emphasized the role of their community in engaging and providing input in the development of these measures, which they said directly impact their activities. In particular, they mentioned ITAR reform as a priority. ITAR stands for the International Traffic in Arms Regulation that implement the Arms Export Control Act. Currently, satellites and related technologies are governed by the DoD’s “munitions list” under ITAR and its strict export control rules. Many industry advocates have called for ITAR reform, which they believe has negatively impacted U.S. competitiveness in the space sector.

Sam Black, SIA director of policy described ITAR reform as the “single most important way of boosting international cooperation.” While Black said he remained hopeful that progress could be made in the next few years, AIA Vice President for Space Systems Frank Slazer was more optimistic.  He expects that work  on ITAR reform could be done before the end of the year. The “circumstances have changed,” he explained — “the market has changed as well as the policies.”