Category: Military

SpacePolicyOnline.com Movie Review: Space Junk 3D

SpacePolicyOnline.com Movie Review: Space Junk 3D

Whirling space trash and panoramic views of Arizona’s Meteor Crater are only two of the reasons to see a new 3D movie — Space Junk 3D.

Shown at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History’s IMAX theater on March 16, 2012 as part of the Environmental Film Festival, the Melrae Pictures film tells the story of Don Kessler, the “father of space junk,” and raises public awareness about the issue that has defined his career.

Using the natural collisions of the universe as an analogy, the film has great computer-generated 3D imagery of asteroids colliding with each other and breaking into pieces that impact the Earth — hence the inclusion of Meteor Crater — and galaxies crashing into each other to form new galaxies.    It is a useful technique to then explain the thousands of objects in Earth orbit that may collide with each other and form yet more debris that imperils operating spacecraft.

An arcane and complicated subject– how many people even know the difference between LEO and MEO or MEO and GEO — the film uses storytelling to capture the public’s interest and 3D animation to provide a visual reference.   Lively questions from the audience of perhaps 150 people after the film was over suggested that they got the point that there’s a problem even if the details and solutions were not apparent.

Experts may quibble with a few of the facts (weather satellites are not in MEO), the sequencing is odd in places (one moment talking about GEO, the next about the Chinese ASAT test in 2007), the ending verges on silliness (depicting a giant orbiting recycling station that would dwarf ISS), and it does have a Carl Sagan-ish quality in almost gloryifying Kessler, but overall it is a useful and fun method to raise public awareness about the need for space sustainability.   Kudos to Melissa Butts and Kimberly Rowe who produced and directed the film.  Visit the Melrae Pictures website for information on where to see it.

Editor’s Note:  This review was originally published as an article on SpacePolicyOnline.com on March 17, 2012.  The first line of the second paragraph has been changed to indicate the actual date on which the movie was shown.

North Korea Plans to Launch Satellite Next Month

North Korea Plans to Launch Satellite Next Month

Saying that it will abide by relevant international regulations and usage concerning the launch of scientific and technological satellites for peaceful purposes, North Korea announced today that it plans to launch a polar orbiting earth observation satellite next month.  The move drew sharp criticism from those who insist that it violates, not abides by, international obligations.

The announcement was reported by South Korea’s Yonhap news agency.   South Korea strongly objected to the upcoming launch calling it a “grave provocative act against peace and stability.”

The U.S. State Department called it a “highly provocative” act that would violate United Nations Security Council resolutions 1718 and 1874 that “clearly and unequivocally prohibit North Korea from conducting launches that use ballistic missile technology.”  The State Department called on North Korea to “adhere to its international obligations” and said it was consulting with “international partners on next steps.”

Events of Interest: Week of March 12-16, 2012-update

Events of Interest: Week of March 12-16, 2012-update

UPDATE:  NASA has postponed the press briefing on NuSTAR that was scheduled for Tuesday.

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead.

The Senate is in session this week.  The House is in recess except for pro forma sessions.

Monday, March 12

Monday-Thursday, March 12-15

  • Satellite 2012, Water E. Washington Convention Center, Washington, DC

Tuesday, March 13

Wednesday, March 14

HASC — Don't Cut Space Test Program or ORS

HASC — Don't Cut Space Test Program or ORS

The hearing was short and sweet, but members of the Strategic Forces subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) got their points across: do not cut two Air Force programs that focus on small satellites — the Space Test Program (STP) and the Operationally Responsive Space (ORS) program.  They also disagreed with each other over the wisdom of negotiating an international Code of Conduct for outer space activities.

Subcommittee chairman Michael Turner (R-OH) began the hearing by noting that the budget request for unclassified national security space programs is down 22 percent from FY2012.  He expressed concern that many of the cuts are from research and development (R&D) programs and termination of STP and ORS.  General William Shelton, commander of Air Force Space Command (AFSC), explained that the reduction is due to several factors, including —

  • completion and “ramp down” of some programs,
  • two Wideband Global SATCOM satellites were funded in FY2012 so another is not needed this year,
  • no funding is requested for the Defense Weather Satellite System that Congress terminated last year and the Air Force is not seeking to revive, and
  • difficult choices were made because AFSC had to contribute its “fair share” of cuts to achieve the overall reduction to DOD’s budget required by the Budget Control Act.  

Turner, ranking member Loretta Sanchez (D-CA), and Rep. Martin Heinrich (D-NM) pressed the case for restoring funds for STP and ORS.  All heralded the achievements of STP over the past almost five decades, including its role in development of the Global Positioning System (GPS).  They similarly extolled the virtues of the ORS program, whose purpose is to demonstrate that satellites can be built and launched on relatively short schedules to respond to urgent warfighter needs.   One satellite, ORS-1, was launched and according to comments at the hearing was a great success.

Shelton stressed that the ORS concept was not going away, just the program office for it.   He insisted that the idea of building small satellites on short notice was being embraced throughout Air Force space programs, this was only a matter of eliminating the program office. 

As for STP, Shelton and Gil Klinger, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space and Intelligence, argued that there are other places in DOD where such R&D takes place and in making difficult budget choices, the decision was made to eliminate STP.  Shelton cited the Air Force Research Lab, the Naval Research Lab, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and “the Army” as alternative places for research.   Heinrich honed in on that comment, asking Shelton if those labs had been consulted to see if they could take up any of the STP work.   Shelton conceded that they were not because of the press of time when final decisions were being made, but coordination is underway now.

Clear divisions between Republicans and Democrats on the wisdom of negotiating an international Code of Conduct (CoC) for outer space activities were evident at the hearing.  The European Union (EU) drafted a CoC that sets out what good behavior is for spacefaring countries — such as not creating space debris — with the idea that it therefore implicitly defines bad behavior.  The United States calls it a good start on an international CoC and has committed to working with the EU and other countries on it.

Turner, however, called it an effort to circumvent the Senate’s role in approving arms control agreements.  Greg Schulte, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy, insisted that it would be a non-binding agreement.  Turner was not assuaged and said that language would be included in this year’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) to deal with the situation, but was not more specific.  Sanchez defended the plan to negotiate a CoC saying she was encouraged that the United States will enter into a conversation about it with other countries.

Export control reform was another hot topic, but despite diligent attempts, Sanchez was unable to get Schulte to tell the subcommittee when the final “section 1248” report will be submitted.   It is two years late, she said.  The requirement for a report on the national security implications of moving commercial communications satellites from the State Department’s Munitions List to the Commerce Department’s Control List is in section 1248 of the 2010 NDAA.  DOD submitted an interim report last year, but the final report has not appeared.   Schulte would only say that he “hoped” it would be submitted “very soon.”  He noted that the interim report recommended that commercial communications satellites be transferred to the Commerce Control List and he expected the final report to include other items that similarly could be moved.

 

 

 

AIA To Release Study on Role of Aerospace and Defense in U.S. Economy

AIA To Release Study on Role of Aerospace and Defense in U.S. Economy

The Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers will release a report tomorrow morning at the National Press Club on the role of aerospace and defense in the U.S. economy.

Speakers are:

  • Marion C. Blakey, AIA President and CEO
  • Thomas Buffenbarger, IAMAW International President
  • Tom Captain, Deloitte Vice Chairman and U.S. Aerospace and Defense Leader
  • General Charles F. Wald, (USAF, Ret.) Director, Deloitte Services LP

The briefing starts at 9:30 am in the Conference Room of the National Press Club, 539 14th Street, NW, Washington, DC.

Events of Interest: Week of March 5-9, 2012

Events of Interest: Week of March 5-9, 2012

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead.  The House and Senate both are in session.

During the Week

This week is chock full of congressional hearings on space activities at NASA, DOD, NOAA, and USGS (which operates the Landsat satellites), not to mention a number of NASA Advisory Council (NAC) committee meetings leading up to the full NAC meeting on Thursday and Friday.   Not sure how much the hearings on NOAA and USGS will focus on space activities since their responsibilities are quite varied, but something of interest may be said.   Separately, NASA is sponsoring a day-long seminar on Thursday at George Washington University in connection with Women’s History Month on “Woman, Innovation and Aerospace.”  

Rather than listing these events day-by-day as we usually do, this week they are grouped into categories for those of you interested primarily in the NAC meetings, the congressional hearings, or the other events.  A day-by-day listing is available on our “Events of Interest” list and on the calendar on our website as always.  

NASA Advisory Council (NAC) meetings, all at NASA Headquarters, Washington DC

Congressional Hearings (all times EST)  Many congressional hearings are webcast and can be viewed on the relevant committee’s website, although most hearings held in rooms in the U.S. Capitol are not.

Other

  • NASA event on Women, Innovation and Aerospace, Thursday, 9:00 am -3:00 pm Jack Morton Auditorium at George Washington University, 805 21st St., NW, Washington DC (speakers include: NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver, NOAA Deputy Administrator Kathy Sullivan, National Academy of Engineering Fellow Catherine Didion, Office of Personnel Management official Veronica Villalobos, and SpacePolicyOnline.com editor Marcia Smith)
  • Secure World Foundation (SWF) Round Table on International Code of Conduct-International Perspectives, Thursday,  Brussels, Belgium (speakers include representatives to the European Union from the United States, Japan, and Australia; Gerard Brachet from the International Astronautical Federation; Pierre-Louis Lempereur from the European External Action Service; and Agnieszka Lukaszczyk from SWF)
Air Force Requests $9.6 Billion for Space in FY2013; EASE Becomes ESP

Air Force Requests $9.6 Billion for Space in FY2013; EASE Becomes ESP

The Air Force budget request for FY2013 includes $9.6 billion in funding for space programs according to Air Force testimony to Congress today.

Air Force Secretary Michael Donley and Air Force Chief of Staff Norman Schwartz presented a joint statement to the House Armed Services Committee.  They provided few details about how the money will be spent, but said:

“With the $9.6 billion in funds for space programs in the FY13 budget request, the Air Force is recapitalizing many space capabilities, fielding new satellite communications systems, replacing legacy early missile warning systems, improving space control capabilities, and upgrading position, navigation and timing capabilities with the launch of Global Positioning System (GPS) IIF satellites and the acquisition of GPS III satellites. Consistent with the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Department of Defense Appropriations Act, the Air Force is canceling the Defense Weather Satellite System, saving $518.8 million in FY13 and $2.38 billion over the FYDP. The Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) will continue to fulfill this critical requirement as the Air Force determines the most prudent way forward.”

The testimony also stressed the need to improve procurement of space systems.  Last year, the Air Force proposed an Evolutionary Acquisition for Space Efficiency (EASE) procurement approach, which envisioned multi-year appropriations from Congress.    Congress was not supportive of the notion, but this year the concept is back — renamed Efficient Space Procurement (ESP).  It also calls for advance appropriations.

Events of Interest: Week of Feb. 27-Mar. 2, 2012–UPDATE 2

Events of Interest: Week of Feb. 27-Mar. 2, 2012–UPDATE 2

Update:  The NAC heliophysics subcommittee meeting Feb. 27-28, and the HASC hearing on DOD’s FY2013 S&T budget request on Feb. 29 have been added.

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead.

The House and Senate are in session this week.

Monday, February 27

Monday-Tuesday, February 27-28

Monday-Wednesday, February 27-29

Tuesday, February 28

 Wednesday,February 29

Friday, March 2

 

 

Events of Interest: Week of February 20-24, 2012

Events of Interest: Week of February 20-24, 2012

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead.

The House and Senate are in recess (except for non-legislative pro forma sessions).

Monday-Tuesday, February 20-21

Tuesday, February 21

Tuesday-Thursday, February 21-23

Thursday, February 23

 Thursday-Friday, February 23-24

NOAA Administrator: Weather Satellites Vital, But "Loom Large" in Budget

NOAA Administrator: Weather Satellites Vital, But "Loom Large" in Budget

Referring repeatedly to the “painful choices” that had to be made, Jane Lubchenco, administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), presented her agency’s FY2013 budget request at a briefing on Thursday.  The need to fund the nation’s “vital” civil weather satellites means that other NOAA programs will be cut, she said, even though the agency as a whole is requesting a slight increase compared to FY2012.  

NOAA, part of the Department of Commerce, is building a new generation of polar-orbiting weather satellites — the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) — as well as a new generation of geostationary weather satellites — the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-R (GOES-R) series.  The FY2013 JPSS budget request is $916.4 million, a slight decrease from the $924 million NOAA received for FY2012.  For GOES-R, the request is $802 million, up substantially from $615.6 million in FY2012 — Lubchenco called it a “planned increase.”   NOAA’s total request is $5.1 billion, an increase of $154 million over FY2012.

Cost overruns and schedule delays in building the new weather satellites, highlighted by the programmatic failure of the tri-agency National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS), have left Congress skeptical of the program management capabilities of NOAA and its NPOESS partner, the Department of Defense (DOD).   DOD has its own polar orbiting weather satellites — the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP).   NPOESS was supposed to merge the NOAA and DOD polar-orbiting systems, but the Obama Administration gave up on the effort in FY2011 after 16 trouble-filled years.  The decision followed a final independent review that concluded the two agencies’ cultures were simply too disparate for them to work together effectively.

The NPOESS divorce terms were that NOAA and DOD would revert to separate systems.  NOAA’s is JPSS and more urgently needed since all of NOAA’s polar orbiting satellites already are in orbit.   DOD still has two of its legacy DMSP satellites “in the barn” awaiting launch when needed.  (DOD was planning a new system, the Defense Weather Satellite System, but it now also has been cancelled.)

The Obama Administration included a sizeable increase for NOAA to get started on JPSS in the FY2011 budget.  Unfortunately, that request was swept up in congressional turmoil as Republicans regained control of the House.  Decisions on the FY2011 budget were delayed until half way through that fiscal year and many programs — including JPSS — were held to their previous year’s level.   Since the FY2010 level reflected the NPOESS program where NOAA and DOD were sharing the costs, it was less than half of what NOAA needed for JPSS.

The program fared better in FY2012, receiving $924 million of the $1.07 billion requested, but the damage was done.  NOAA is concerned that there is very likely to be a “data gap” when existing satellites expire before the first JPSS is launched.   Kathy Sullivan, Deputy Administrator of NOAA, said yesterday that there may still be a data gap even if Congress agrees to the funding level for JPSS included in the FY2013 request. 

NOAA launched its last polar-orbit weather satellite in 2009.   It has a five year design lifetime.  A NASA research satellite, Suomi NPP, that was designed to test new technologies for the NPOESS program and was launched last fall will be pressed into service as an operational weather satellite to bridge the gap until the first JPSS is launched in late 2016 or early 2017.    Suomi NPP has a three-year design lifetime.  While satellites often exceed their design lifetimes, it is risky to bank on that, which is why NOAA is worried.  Sullivan said that if all the satellites meet, but do not exceed, their design lifetimes, a 20-22 month data gap could result, especially taking into account that it requires several months for the JPSS satellite to be tested and calibrated after launch.

Lubchenco said yesterday that the FY2013 request provides a “stable funding path for the next five years” for JPSS and that the agency has committed to a funding cap for the lifecycle costs of the program.    Senate appropriators included a cap in their version (S. Rept. 112-78) of the FY2012 appropriations bill that funds NOAA (P.L. 112-55), but it was not adopted in the conference report (H. Rept. 112-284).  The Senate wanted to cap the program at $9.43 billion through 2024.  Lubchenco did not specify if that is the cap to which she is now committed.

The Senate appropriators fretted about the “long term drain” JPSS could have on other NOAA programs.  That sentiment was echoed in yesterday’s briefing as well.   Lubchenco stated that “the need to fund polar and geostationary satellites imposes serious constraints on the rest of NOAA’s budget.”  Later, In response to a question about whether cuts to NOAA’s education programs might be restored next year, she replied that satellites “will continue to loom large in our budget.” 

The GOES-R program has had its own significant overruns, although it appears to be on track at the moment.   The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued several reports about the program, most recently in 2010.   The first of the GOES-R series is expected in the first quarter of FY2016.  Lubchenco called the geostationary weather satellites “an unblinking eye in the sky” to monitor hurricanes and other weather phenomena.

Lubchenco’s clear message, in fact, is that weather satellites are vital to many of NOAA’s other programs, including fisheries, coastal management, and building a “weather-ready nation,” not to mention many other aspects of American life, the economy and national security.  Therefore, they must be a top priority for NOAA, she said.

NOAA’s FY2013 request also supports two smaller satellite programs, JASON-3 and DSCOVR.   JASON-3 is the third in a series of U.S.-European ocean altimetry satelites for which $30 million is requested, up from $19.7 million provided in FY2012.   DSCOVR is a space weather satellite that dates back to the Clinton Administration when it was called Triana.  Vice President Al Gore was closely associated with developing the idea for the satellite and its launch was deferred for political reasons after George W. Bush became President.   The return of White House control to Democrats in 2009 gave the project new life and NASA, NOAA and DOD are working together to get the spacecraft ready for launch and into space.  NOAA is requesting $22.9 million for FY2013, compared to $29.8 million provided for FY2012.