Category: Space Law

Events of Interest: Week of January 22-27, 2012

Events of Interest: Week of January 22-27, 2012

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead.

During the Week

The House and Senate both will be in session this week and President Obama will deliver his annual State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night.   The American Meteorological Society (AMS) holds its annual meeting beginning today in New Orleans, LA, with “town hall” sessions on topics related to earth observing satellites on Tuesday and Wednesday.  The four-week World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC) 2012, convened by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) where the nations of the world meet to allocate spectrum for terrestrial and space uses, begins in Geneva, Switzerland.

Sunday-Thursday, January 22-26

Monday, January 23 – Friday, February 17

Tuesday, January 24

Wednesday, January 25

 Friday, January 27

Clinton Commits U.S. To Work on Space Code of Conduct-UPDATE

Clinton Commits U.S. To Work on Space Code of Conduct-UPDATE

UPDATE:  A link to a one-pager issued by the State Department explaining the need for an International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities has been added.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton issued a statement today committing the United States to working with the European Union and other countries to develop a “code of conduct” to ensure the long term sustainability of the space environment.

Secretary Clinton cautioned that “the United States has made clear to our partners that we will not enter into a code of conduct that in any way constrains our national security-related activities in space or our ability to protect the United States and our allies.”   Nonetheless, the United States wants to work with other countries to “reverse the troubling trends that are damaging our space environment and to preserve the limitless benefits and promise of space for future generations.”

The full text of the Secretary’s statement is as follows:

“The long-term sustainability of our space environment is at serious risk from space debris and irresponsible actors.  Ensuring the stability, safety, and security of our space systems is of vital interest to the United States and the global community.  These systems allow the free flow of information across platforms that open up our global markets, enhance weather forecasting and environmental monitoring, and enable global navigation and transportation.

“Unless the international community addresses these challenges, the environment around our planet will become increasingly hazardous to human spaceflight and satellite systems, which would create damaging consequences for all of us.

“In response to these challenges, the United States has decided to join with the European Union and other nations to develop an International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities.  A Code of Conduct will help maintain the long-term sustainability, safety, stability, and security of space by establishing guidelines for the responsible use of space.

As we begin this work, the United States has made clear to our partners that we will not enter into a code of conduct that in any way constrains our national security-related activities in space or our ability to protect the United States and our allies.  We are, however, committed to working together to reverse the troubling trends that are damaging our space environment and to preserve the limitless benefits and promise of space for future generations.”

The State Department also issued a one-pager explaining the need for an International Code of Conduct for Space Activities.  It notes that  60 nations and government consortia as well as academic and commercial entities operate 1,100 active satellites today, part of the 22,000 space objects being tracked by the U.S. Department of Defense.  Not only does the United States need to address challenges from this increasingly congested space environment, the State Department says, but “threats to the space environment will increase as more nations and non-state actors develop and deploy counter-space systems.”  

 “Given the increasing threat — through either irresponsible or unintentional acts — to the long term sustainability, stability, safety, and security of space operations, we must work with the community of spacefaring nations to preserve the space environment for all nations and future generations,” it stresses. (Italics in original.)

 

Apollo Artifacts: Which to Sell, Which to Protect?

Apollo Artifacts: Which to Sell, Which to Protect?

This year is the 40th anniversary of the last — or perhaps “most recent” — human visit to the Moon and it is starting off with controversy over whether the astronauts who participated in the Apollo program have the right to sell mementoes of those missions.  At the same time, some historians are trying to preserve the artifacts that remain on the lunar surface as companies and other countries make plans to send robots or people there.

NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden, himself a former NASA astronaut — though from the space shuttle era, not the earlier Apollo missions — met with four Apollo astronauts yesterday to discuss the rules that guide whether their personal mementoes are their property or the government’s.   Apollo 13 astronaut Jim Lovell, Apolllo 17 astronaut Gene Cernan, Apollo 16 astronaut Charlie Duke, and Apollo 9 astronaut Rusty Schweickert, met with Bolden along with representatives of other astronauts and NASA personnel.   Bolden said in a press statement that the meeting was to talk about “how to resolve the misunderstandings and ownership questions regarding flight mementoes and other artifacts.”   Bolden called the men “American heroes, fellow astronauts and personal friends who have acted in good faith” and promised to work on resolving “the right policy and legal paths forward…”

NASA has not taken kindly to the actions of some Apollo astronauts who have sold or attempted to sell mementoes in their possession.   Quite recently, Lovell reportedly sold a checklist from his ill-fated Apollo 13 mission at auction for $400,000, setting off the latest wave of concern. Bolden said that he believes there have been “fundamental misunderstandings and unclear policies” and the agency will “explore all policy, legislative and other legal means” to clarify ownership and “ensure that appropriate artifacts are preserved and available for display to the American people.”

While those discussions proceed, others are focused on preserving artifacts left behind on the Moon.   Resurgent interest in the Moon not only for scientific studies or human exploration, but also potential commercial activities, could mean that sites and items of historical interest could be damaged or destroyed.   Should the Apollo 11 landing site and the bottom half of its lunar lander, which remains on the Moon, not to mention the American flag implanted by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, be preserved for history or are future robotic or human explorers free to tread upon or take whatever they find?

Writing in the The Space Review in November 2011, Matthew Kleiman, who chairs the space law committee of the American Bar Association Section of Science &Technology Law, concluded that the only guarantee for “comprehensive protection” would be an international agreement.  He added, however, that “international space law and traditional property and tort law” offer “limited mechanisms.”

NASA issued a set of recommendations last year, posted on the CollectSpace website, about what exactly should be preserved on the lunar surface.  Entitled “NASA’s Recommendations to Space-Faring Entities:  How to Protect and Preserve the Historic and Scientific Value of U.S. Government Lunar Artifacts,” the document was issued on July 20, 2011, the 42nd anniversary of the Apollo 11 landing — the first time humans walked on the Moon.  Google Lunar X-Prize, which is sponsoring a competition where a team can win a bonus if its robotic spacecraft makes a “precision landing near an Apollo site or other lunar sites of interest,” applauded release of the document in an October 13, 2011 statement.

The New York Times took note of the debate over preserving lunar artifacts on the Moon yesterday, but did not mention the corollary debate over what the Apollo astronauts can do with their own mementoes.

SpacePolicyOnline.com Unveils Revamped Website

SpacePolicyOnline.com Unveils Revamped Website

Today marks the launch of our revamped website.  The event should be seamless, but if you encounter any difficulties, please let us know at info@spacepolicyonline.com or marcia.s.smith@gmail.com.

WHAT WE KEPT

Based on the many positive comments we’ve received over the past two years, we’ve kept the same look and feel.  Our web address is the same and if you are getting our RSS feed nothing should change.   You will still be able to access all the free content to which you are accustomed — our objective, non-partisan reporting and analysis; handy fact sheets, hearing and meeting summaries; lists of GAO, NRC and other reports of interest; and a listing of events of interest to the space policy community.

WHAT’S NEW

  • SHARE YOUR VIEWS:  You can now post comments using Disqus.   We encourage debate, but ask that everyone keep his or her  remarks professional and dignified.   Passion is OK, vitriol – no.  As we state at the bottom of the Disqus comment box, SpacePolicyOnline.com has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
  • SIGN UP FOR A DAILY EMAIL NOTIFICATION:  As requested, you can now sign up for daily emails to keep apprised of new stories that we’ve posted.  In the blue bar at the top of our home page, click the envelope icon and enter your email address.   We don’t do anything with your email address; this service is provided automatically through Feedburner.
  • SEARCH MORE EASILY:   Our search box is in the same place (top right), but the search engine recognizes longer strings of characters, making searching much easier. 
  • VIEW EVENTS OF INTEREST AS A LIST:   We’ve replaced the calendar on our home page with a list of upcoming events, but if you liked the calendar format, you can still see one by clicking on the “full calendar with filters” link at the bottom of the list.
  • SHARE USING EMAIL, SOCIAL MEDIA AND OTHER TOOLS:  You can now easily share our stories with others via Twitter, Facebook and other e-tools.  We’ve also made it easier for you to follow us on Twitter or Facebook by using the now-familiar icons on the top right of the home page.    If you don’t use Twitter yourself, you can see what we are tweeting and retweeting right there on our home page.  Twitter is a terrific news feed and we find lots of interesting tweets by others to retweet and bring to your attention, so please check our “Twitter widget” throughout the day.
  • ADVERTISE ON SPACEPOLICYONLINE.COM:   Contact us at info@spacepolicyonline.com for details. 

WHAT’S COMING

Soon we will be offering premium reports for purchase on a per-report basis or by subscription.  Building on the tradition of Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports that SpacePolicyOnline.com founder and editor Marcia Smith wrote for more than three decades, our premium reports will provide objective and non-partisan information and analysis about commercial, military and civil space policy and programs in the United States and around the world.  Stay tuned for details!

We’re excited about the new site and hope you are, too.   With best wishes to you and yours for happy holidays and a sparkling New Year!

Marcia Smith and Laura Delgado

UPDATED: Events of Interest: Week of December 5-9, 2011

UPDATED: Events of Interest: Week of December 5-9, 2011

The following events may be of interest in the coming week.   For more information, check our calendar on the right menu or click the links below.  The House and Senate both are in session this week. 

Monday-Friday, December 5-9 

Tuesday, December 6

  • Women in Aerospace, Space Telescopes: Today, Tomorrow and Beyond, 2325 Rayburn House Office Building, 12:00-2:00 pm EST
  • United Launch Alliance (ULA) Celebrates Its Fifth Anniversary, National Press Club, Hoelman Lounge, Washington, DC, 12:30-1:30 pm
  • HSS&T hearing on James Webb Space Telescope, 2318 Rayburn House Office Building. 2:00 pm (note the time change)

Thursday, December 8

 Friday, December 9 

  • NASA Future Forum 2, Museum of Flight, Seattle, Washington, 9:00 am – 12:30 pm PST (noon-3:30 pm EST)
Paul Dembling, Noted Space Lawyer, Passes Away

Paul Dembling, Noted Space Lawyer, Passes Away

Paul Dembling, a highly respected lawyer renowned for his role in helping to craft the 1958 National Aeronautics and Space Act (NASA Act), passed away on May 16 according to NASA.

Mr. Dembling was the general counsel to NASA’s predecessor agency, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), and along with other experts, including Eilene Galloway at Congress’s Legislative Reference Service (now the Congressional Research Service), drafted the law that created NASA. He served in several capacities at NASA — as general counsel, head of Legislative Affairs, and Deputy Associate Administrator.

He retired from NASA in 1969. Later he was the general counsel of the General Accounting Office (now the Government Accountability Office) and after that was in private practice.

He recounted his role in drafting the NASA Act in an interview for NASA’s 50th anniversary magazine as well as in a 2001 oral interview for his alma mater, George Washington University (GWU). At that time he donated his professional papers to GWU’s law library.

Student Essay Competition Reminder: Win Over $700!

Student Essay Competition Reminder: Win Over $700!

The journal Space Policy would like to remind graduate students in space policy and law school students that the deadline for the 2010 Maxim Tarasenko Essay Competition is December 31, 2010. The competition is sponsored by the journal and the Secure World Foundation, with a prize of 500 ($788 at today’s exchange rate), a one-year subscription to the journal, and publication of the winning essay in the journal.

Essays are due to Frances Brown, editor of Space Policy, by December 31, 2010. Complete rules are available in the announcement. The contest honors Maxim Tarasenko, a highly respected Russian space policy analyst and member of Space Policy’s Editorial Board who tragically died in 1999.

International Cooperation is Good, But China Presents Challenges, Conference Participants Conclude

International Cooperation is Good, But China Presents Challenges, Conference Participants Conclude

During the “Space Day” part of the 3rd Annual Washington, D.C. Space and Cyber Conference of the University of Nebraska’s College of Law, participants considered the implications of the Obama Administration’s National Space Policy and many pointed to its emphasis on international cooperation.

Speaking at the Military Space Panel, Deborah Plunkett of the Air Force’s Office of the General Counsel characterized space situational awareness (SSA) as “the most legally ripe area of cooperation.” Greater cooperation in SSA — wherein satellite operators would have more knowledge of where other satellites and pieces of debris are located in order to avoid collisions — will have to address a number of challenges, including respecting “historic agreements” on data protection, she said.

Bruce MacDonald, who served as Senior Director of the Congressional Commission on Strategic Posture of the United States, agreed that SSA is a viable area of cooperation. MacDonald, who lauded the inclusion of arms control in the National Space Policy as a “good change,” linked SSA with deterrence, which is, in his view, the appropriate goal of the United States in space: “the more countries know they are [being] observed, the more cautious they’ll be.” Plunkett added that the accountability derived from attribution for anti-satellite (ASAT) attacks or other debris-causing behavior “may impact what people do in space.”

Dean Cheng, Research Fellow at the Asian Studies Center of the Heritage Foundation, described that assumption as “interesting,” and cautioned that increased SSA or cooperation in that area may not be so easy with actors like China and may not aid deterrence. What were the lessons for China after the 2007 ASAT test, he asked rhetorically. Instead of suffering from this incident, Cheng explained, China learned that there are no consequences to conducting such tests. When considering China, which he described as “a genuine space power”, he asked if knowing more about the behavior of other actors in space would be deterrence or, considering the “asymmetry of interests” between China and the United States, might serve the opposite role.

With major challenges in U.S.-China relations, space cooperation with China – which was not ruled out as a possibility in the new policy – still may be some time off. When asked about cooperating with China in human spaceflight missions, the Deputy Administrator of NASA, Lori Garver, who delivered the afternoon’s keynote speech, joked “I’m so sorry, that’s all the time we have.” She could only add that just like the inclusion of Russia in the International Space Station, “human spaceflight cooperation will not be a NASA decision.”

Her response echoed Cheng’s earlier comments that “whether we can cooperate in space [with China] depends on whether we can cooperate on the ground” and that “cooperation needs to start with baby steps.” The first challenge may prove to be the United States’ own understanding of Chinese activities and motivations, what Cheng described as its “opacity.” Looking to “problems on the horizon,” MacDonald agreed with this description and said that “China is our biggest concern in space…that China will continue to be opaque.” The hope is, he argued, that by showing China that such a stance is counterproductive, it will become “less opaque, more transparent…at least translucent.”

Analysis of New National Space Policy Begins

Analysis of New National Space Policy Begins

The Secure World Foundation and the Arms Control Association sponsored a seminar yesterday on President Obama’s new national space policy. The organizations plan to post a transcript of the meeting in the near future. In the meantime, DODBuzz reported on it.

Jeff Abramson of the Arms Control Associaion was the moderator. Speakers were:

  • Marcia Smith, SpacePolicyOnline.com
  • Ben Basely-Walker, Secure World Foundation
  • Bruce McDonald, U.S. Institute of Peace

Also, Jeff Kueter at the Marshall Institute has posted his analysis, including a side-by-side comparison, of the Obama policy compared with President George W. Bush’s 2006 version.

IISL To Host Special 50th Anniversary Lectures at Prague Colloquium

IISL To Host Special 50th Anniversary Lectures at Prague Colloquium

To mark its 50th anniversary this year, the International Institute of Space Law (IISL) is hosting several events. The first, a seminar on Space Law and Policy 2010, was held two weeks ago in Washington, DC. The next event will be in conjunction with the IISL Colloquium in Prague, the Czech Republic, as part of the International Astronautical Congress from September 27-October 1, 2010.

The “Nandasiri Jasentuliyana Keynote Lecture on Space Law,” named in honor of the immediate past president of the IISL, will consist of three lectures on the history of the IISL, the history of space law, and the history of two of the early pioneers of space law (Prof. V. Mandl and Prof. A. Meyer). The lectures will be followed by a Young Scholars Session.

The IISL also will republish the seminal 1972 book on space law by the late Judge Manfred Lachs, a former IISL President and President of the International Court of Justice.

For more information on these and other 50th anniversary events, visit IISL’s website.