Category: International

Cause of Progress M-27M Failure Remains Elusive

Cause of Progress M-27M Failure Remains Elusive

Russian space experts continue to try to determine exactly what went wrong when Progress M-27M and its Soyuz 2.1a rocket separated on April 28.  Telemetry data reportedly are not enough to solve the mystery.

Russia’s official Tass news agency quotes an unnamed Russian space industry source as saying that “the telemetry data are not enough” and members of the State Commission investigating the incident are going to the companies that manufactured various components to inspect others from the same batches to try and recreate whatever went wrong.

Roscosmos and NASA indicated earlier this week that the investigation would finish by May 22, but Tass reported today that may slip.  “True, some findings may be presented by May 22,” it quotes the industry source, but “specialists will keep working at individual enterprises after that date.”

Progress M-27M was launched on April 28, but something went wrong when it separated from the third stage of its Soyuz launch vehicle that left both of them in incorrect orbits and the robotic cargo spacecraft spinning.   Control of the spacecraft was lost and it reentered over the Pacific Ocean on May 7 Eastern Standard Time (May 8 Moscow Time).  Initial speculation that the third stage exploded was ruled out in a preliminary report from the State Commission earlier this week. Roscosmos said on May 12  that determining the cause would require in depth computational and theoretical studies as well as modeling.

Russia, NASA and the other International Space Station (ISS) partners agreed on Tuesday to a revised schedule of crew and cargo flights to and from the ISS.  The return of Soyuz TMA-15M with three ISS crew members, planned for May 13, will wait until early June and the launch of their replacements was delayed from May 26 to July 24.   A different version of the Soyuz rocket is used for transporting crews to the ISS. 

The revised schedule calls for accelerating the next launch of a Progress cargo mission from August 6 to early July.   Progress M-27M was the second of four planned Progress launches to the ISS this year.  It was carrying three tons of food, fuel and other cargo.  NASA says that the loss of the spacecraft is not affecting U.S. operations on ISS, but Roscosmos has not indicated whether its crew activities are impacted.  

In addition to Russia’s Progress, ISS is resupplied by two U.S. commercial cargo vehicles — SpaceX’s Dragon and Orbital ATK’s Cygnus — and Japan’s HTV.  A Dragon is currently attached to ISS and three more launches are scheduled this year.  An HTV launch is planned for August and a Cygnus is expected by the end of the year.   NASA said on Tuesday, however, that the schedule of launches for the rest of the year remains under review.

NASA refers to Progress M-27M as Progress 59 because it is the 59th Progress to service the ISS, but many more Progress missions have been conducted since the first was launched in 1977.  Progress cargo ships supported the Soviet/Russian space stations Salyut 6, Salyut 7 and Mir before ISS.

SASC Completes Markup: Digs in on Replacing RD-180, Not Convinced About DMSP-20

SASC Completes Markup: Digs in on Replacing RD-180, Not Convinced About DMSP-20

The Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) completed markup of its version of the FY2016 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) today.   Most of the subcommittee markups, including that of the Strategic Forces subcommittee, and full committee markup were closed, so the release of a committee fact sheet and a press conference by chairman John McCain (R-AZ) today provide the first public view of what it contains.  Space programs, especially launch vehicles, warranted considerable attention.

McCain and others on the committee, including Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL), have been leaders in Congress to move the Air Force away from using Russia’s RD-180 rocket engines.  RD-180s power the United Launch Alliance’s (ULA’s) Atlas V rocket.  McCain also has been a crucial supporter of SpaceX’s determination to compete against ULA for launching national security satellites.  SASC led efforts in last year’s NDAA to set a deadline of 2019 for using RD-180s, which the Air Force is seeking to modify so it has more time to build a new American engine, integrate it into a launch vehicle, test and certify it for launching national security satellites.

The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) went along with the Air Force request in its version of the FY2016 NDAA, which is being debated by the House right now.  SASC did not follow suit.   Instead, it “revalidates” Section 1608 of last year’s NDAA, which sets the deadline, although waivers are allowed under certain circumstances.  The SASC bill “limits the use of Russian rocket engines, allowing for as few as zero but as many as nine,” according to the press release.  The bill has other provisions aimed at ending U.S. reliance on Russian engines as soon as possible.

McCain said at the press conference, as he has in other venues, that he does not want American dollars going to “cronies” of Russian President Vladimir Putin.  Today he said Putin is “dismembering a country as we speak,” referring to Ukraine.  (His comments are at the very end of the press conference).  He also called the issue of the rocket engines and ULA a “classic example of the military-industrial complex” and said that SpaceX has said it can have a replacement for RD-180s by 2017, a probable reference to SpaceX’s plans for its Falcon Heavy rocket, which is expected to make its first flight this year, but it would take some time for it to be certified to launch national security satellites (which are very expensive and critically necessary so launch failures are not easily tolerated).

SASC also expressed caution about DOD’s plans to launch the last of its legacy Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellites. The Air Force decided last year that it did not need DMSP-20, but changed its mind this year and now wants to launch it.  At an April 29 hearing, Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James and Commander of Air Force Space Command Gen. John Hyten said several factors led to their revised decision even though it will cost “millions of dollars”: the Europeans have decided not to replace a geostationary weather satellite DOD has been using to support its operations in Afghanistan and the Middle East, it will give the Air Force more time to decide on the future of its weather satellite program, it will provide an additional competitive space launch opportunity, and people within the national security community who deal with weather issues on a day to day basis “very, very much want to see that satellite launched.”

SASC was not convinced.   The bill prohibits the use of funds for the DMSP program or for launch of DMSP-20 until the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certify that “non-material or lower cost solutions are insufficient.”

On other matters, SASC  —

  • approves $20 million for the Operationally Responsive Space (ORS) office, “an increase of $13.5 million to match the previous year funding level”
  • requires the President to establish an interagency process to develop a policy to deter adversaries in space
  • requires the Secretary of Defense to designate an individual to be the Principal Space Control Advisor
  • establishes a council to “review and be responsible for” DOD’s positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) enterprise (GPS is a PNT system)
  • requires a plan for consolidating acquisition of commercial communication satellite services
  • requires an analysis of alternatives for replacing the Wideband Global Satellite System
House SS&T Approves Four Commercial Space Bills

House SS&T Approves Four Commercial Space Bills

The House Science, Space and Technology (SS&T) Committee approved four commercial space bills today after lengthy debate largely along partisan lines.  Thirteen amendments were offered to the main bill, the SPACE Act (H.R. 2262), an update of the Commercial Space Launch Act.  While Republicans touted a long list of endorsements from commercial space companies, Rep. Eddie Bernie Johnson (D-TX) did not find that surprising, protesting that “the bill came straight from industry.”

Sponsored by House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), the Spurring Private Aerospace Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship (SPACE) Act is a broad bill with many provisions and it engendered lengthy debate.  House SS&T Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) and Space Subcommittee Chairman Steve Palazzo (R-MS) are original co-sponsors.   Perhaps the most significant amendment adopted to that bill was proposed by Rep. Steve Knight (R-CA) to extend until 2025 the “learning period” for commercial human spaceflight as well as the FAA’s authority to indemnify commercial space launch companies against certain amounts of third party liability in the event of a launch accident.

The learning period refers to a span of years when the FAA is not
allowed to promulgate new regulations governing commercial human
spaceflight that might stifle that industry’s growth as it gains
experience.  That period is set to expire on September 30, 2015.  The indemnification provision means that the government
would pay for certain amounts of damages to uninvolved individuals in
the event of a launch accident (the commercial companies must purchase
insurance to cover other amounts).  The government has had
Indemnification authority for commercial launches since 1988, but
Congress extends it for set periods of time rather than permanently so
it can periodically review whether it is still needed.  Current authority ends on December 31, 2016.

As introduced, H.R. 2262 would have extended the learning period and third-party indemnification to 2023.   Knight argued for another two years to provide stability for the commercial industry.  Rep. Donna Edwards (D-MD) offered amendments to reduce the time to 5 years for both provisions so Congress could have more opportunity to review the issues as the industry evolves.  She pointed out that the Senate version of the bill would extend those provisions only until 2020.  Nonetheless, Knight’s amendment won.

The Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act, H.R. 1508, sponsored by Rep. Bill Posey (R-FL), also was particularly controversial.  It grants property rights to materials mined on asteroids by U.S. companies.  The bill is co-sponsored by a Democrat, Rep. Derek Kilmer (D-WA), but he is not a member of House SS&T and Democrats on this committee strongly opposed it.   Johnson offered a substitute that would have called for a study of the issues associated with property rights in space, noting that at a hearing last year, a highly respected space lawyer, Joanne Gabrynowicz, asserted a prior version of the bill would violate U.S. obligations under the 1967 Outer Space Treaty.   Johnson said that Gabrynowicz reviewed the current bill and had similar concerns.  Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) went further and said “the bill is unconstitutional, not even a close question.”  Posey countered that there have been enough studies and what is needed now is action to ensure U.S. leadership in this pursuit.  As for the constitutionality question, he repeated a point made by Grayson that the founding fathers could not have imagined a time when laws were needed about mining other bodies in the solar system, and said that raising this as an issue was simply an obstructionist tactic.  Johnson’s amendment failed on a party-line vote.

The other two bills were less controversial.   Rep. Bridenstine’s (R-OK) Commercial Remote Sensing Act (H.R. 2261) and Rep. Rohrabacher’s (R-CA) Office of Space Commerce Act (H.R. 2263) passed easily, with a relatively minor Grayson amendment adopted to H.R. 2261.  That bill seeks to facilitate NOAA granting licenses to commercial remote sensing companies in a timely manner.  H.R. 2263 would change the name of NOAA’s Office of Space Commercialization to the Office of Space Commerce and expand its responsibilities.

The texts of all the bills and amendments and the disposition of the amendments are posted on the committee’s website.

Space Station Crew Return Delayed Until June, Next Launch Until July

Space Station Crew Return Delayed Until June, Next Launch Until July

NASA and its partners in the International Space Station (ISS) program decided today to extend the mission of three ISS crew members who were supposed to return to Earth tomorrow and postpone the launch of their replacements. The schedule change was prompted by the failure of Russia’s robotic Progress M-27M spacecraft last week.

Progress M-27M reentered over the Pacific Ocean on May 7 Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) and Roscosmos proposed changes to ISS crew and cargo flights at that time.  NASA announced today agreement among all the partners to the revised schedule, though exact dates have not been determined.  The ISS is a partnership among the United States, Russia, Canada, Japan, and 11 European countries working through the European Space Agency (ESA).

NASA’s Terry Virts, ESA’s Samantha Cristoforetti and Roscosmos’ Anton Shkaplerov were scheduled to return to Earth on their Soyuz TMA-15 spacecraft tomorrow (May 13).  The exact date for their rescheduled return in early June will be determined later.  The launch of their replacements on Soyuz TMA-17M will be postponed from May 26 to late July.   The three other ISS crew members now aboard ISS are NASA’s Scott Kelly, and Roscosmos’ Mikhail Kornienko and Gennady Padalka.  Kelly and Kornienko are part of the first one-year mission aboard ISS and will not return until March 2016.  Padalka is currently scheduled to come home in September.

Progress M-27M was launched on April 28, 2015 EDT and immediately ran into trouble.  A malfunction at the time it separated from the third stage of its Soyuz 2.1a rocket left both in incorrect orbits and the Progress spacecraft spinning.  One theory is that the third stage exploded, debris punctured the spacecraft’s fuel line, and venting fuel put Progress into a spin.  Roscosmos said today that the State Commission investigating the accident will conclude its work by May 22.

Progress M-27M was the second of four planned Progress cargo missions to the ISS this year.  The next had been scheduled for August 6, but the new schedule will accelerate that by about a month.

The new plan is as follows:

  • Return of Soyuz TMA-15M (Virts, Cristoforetti, Shkaplerov) in early June instead of on May 13
  • Progress M-28M launch in early July instead of August 6
  • Launch of Soyuz TMA-17M with Kjell Lindgren (NASA), Kimiya Yui (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) and Oleg Kononenko (Roscosmos) in late July instead of on May 26

NASA refers to Progress M-27M as Progress 59 because it is the 59th Progress to resupply ISS, but the Progress spacecraft has been in use by Russia since 1977 so there have been many more flights than that.  It was carrying three tons of food, fuel and other supplies for the ISS crew, but NASA insists that U.S. operations are not affected by the failure.  

A U.S. SpaceX Dragon cargo craft is currently attached to the ISS, and three more are scheduled this year.  Japan’s HTV cargo spacecraft is scheduled for launch in August and the U.S. Orbital ATK Cygnus cargo spacecraft is expected to be launched by the end of the year.  NASA said, however, that all of the dates for the remaining flights to ISS this year are under review. 

Four House Commercial Space Bills Span Wide Range of Topics

Four House Commercial Space Bills Span Wide Range of Topics

The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee will mark up four bills on May 13, 2015 dealing with a broad range of commercial space activities.  Three of the bills have yet to be introduced, but SpacePolicyOnline.com obtained copies.  In total, they span everything from regulating commercial human spaceflight to third party indemnification to property rights for mining asteroids to expanding the role of NOAA’s Office of Space Commercialization.

The committee announced the markup and the titles of the bills late this afternoon.  Only one has a bill number because the others are yet to be introduced. The bills are:

  • H. R. ___, the Spurring Private Aerospace Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship Act of 2015 (the SPACE Act)
  • H.R. 1508, the Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act of 2015
  • H.R. ____, the Commercial Remote Sensing Act of 2015 and
  • H.R. ____, the Office of Space Commerce Act

According to the copies obtained by SpacePolicyOnline.com, the four bills have the following goals:

  • The SPACE Act will be introduced by House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who represents a district including Edwards Air Force Base and the Mojave Air and Space Port, along with House SS&T chairman Rep, Lamar Smith (R-TX) and Space Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Steve Palazzo (R-MS). The broadly-based bill is aimed at updating the Commercial Space Launch Act (CSLA).  Among its provisions the bill would:
    • extend the so-called “learning period” during which the FAA is prohibited from issuing new regulations for commercial human spaceflight until 2023. That restriction currently expires on September 30 of this year.  It also allows industry to develop voluntary industry standards and requires a report from the Secretary of Transportation in 2021 on industry’s progress in that regard and an independent assessment of the readiness of industry and government to transition to a framework that “may include regulations.”
    • extend the government’s ability to indemnify commercial space launch companies from certain amounts of third party losses through 2023 (the current authority expires in December 2016).
    • require updating the methodology to establish the maximum probable loss used by the FAA to establish requirements for companies to obtain third party liability insurance.
    • add and define “government astronaut” as a type of personnel that may be aboard a commercial human spaceflight mission.
    • require a study by an independent contractor of frameworks for space traffic management.
    • make a “sense of Congress” statement that launch facilities developed, owned or operated by States should take proper measures to “secure their investments and the safety of third parties from potential damages….”   That language probably is in response to the damage caused by the failure of Orbital’s Antares rocket at the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS) facility at NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility in October 2014.  The MARS facility is owned by the State of Virginia rather than the Federal Government and although Orbital had purchased required insurance under its FAA license (and other insurance for company purposes), Virginia did not buy insurance to cover its potential losses.  Virginia’s two Senators led efforts to add $20 million to the FY2015 appropriations bill that funds NASA to cover those losses, but the Obama Administration is reluctant to release those funds.
  • H.R. 1508 was introduced by Rep. Bill Posey (R-FL) and Rep. Derek Kilmer (D-WA) on March 19, 2015 and establishes a legal framework to govern property rights for U.S. companies involved the exploration and utilization of asteroids.  The committee held a hearing on similar legislation last year.
  • The Commercial Remote Sensing Act of 2015 will be sponsored by Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-OK) to require annual reports from the Secretary of Commerce on its activities related to issuing licenses to commercial remote sensing companies, and a separate report on statutory changes that may be needed to protect national security, protect the U.S. industrial base, and reflect the current state of the art of remote sensing technologies.
  • The Office of Space Commerce Act will be sponsored by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) to rename the Department of Commerce’s Office of Space Commercialization as the Office of Space Commerce and amend its responsibilities, especially increasing its role in positioning, navigation and timing satellites (i.e. GPS).

The markup is at 2:00 pm ET on May 13, 2015.

 

Progress M-27M Reenters, Russians Propose Changes to ISS Schedule – UPDATE

Progress M-27M Reenters, Russians Propose Changes to ISS Schedule – UPDATE

UPDATE:  Adds information on JSpOC confirming the reentry.

The Progress M-27M spacecraft reentered over the Pacific Ocean at 05:04 Moscow Time on May 8 (10:04 pm Eastern Daylight Time tonight) according to Russia’s space agency, Roscosmos.  Roscosmos reportedy is proposing changes to the schedule for launching the next crews and cargo missions to the International Space Station (ISS) as they continue to diagnose and remedy what went wrong.

Roscosmos said in a statement that the robotic spacecraft, which was carrying about three tons of cargo intended to resupply the ISS crew, “ceased to exist … over the central Pacific Ocean” at 05:04 Moscow Time on May 8 (May 7, 10:04 pm EDT).  The U.S. Joint Space Operations Center (JSpOC) later issued a statement confirming the reentry.

Launched on April 28, the spacecraft apparently was damaged when the third stage of its Soyuz 2.1a rocket suffered a malfunction as the two reached orbit.  Anatoly Zak at RussianSpaceWeb.com reported yesterday that Russian experts believe the third stage exploded, damaging the spacecraft and puncturing its fuel lines, putting it into a spin as the fuel vented into space. Russian flight controllers initially received conflicting data about the spacecraft’s status, then received video from an onboard camera showing it rotating several times a minute.   Soon thereafter, the mission was declared a total loss.

A Roscosmos working group is proposing changes to the next launches of ISS personnel and cargo as efforts continue to determine what happened with the Soyuz 2.1a rocket.  This was the second of four planned Progress launches to ISS this year.  The next two are currently scheduled for August 6 and October 22.  Russia uses a different variant of the Soyuz rocket to launch three-person crews on Soyuz spacecraft.  Three more Soyuz crew launches are scheduled this year:  May 26, September 1, and November 20.

The proposal is to delay the next Soyuz crew launch, Soyuz TMA-17M carrying Oleg Kononenko from Roscosmos, Kimiya Yui from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), and Kjell Lindgren from NASA, until June 11 according to Russia’s official news agency, Tass.   Another Progress flight would be launched in late June/early July, and then another crew launch at the end of July, a separate Tass story stated.  These dates are all preliminary at this time.

Reentry Update for Progress M-27M – LATEST UPDATE

Reentry Update for Progress M-27M – LATEST UPDATE

UPDATE, May 7, 2015, 8:30 pm EDT:  Aerospace Corp’s latest prediction is May 8 02:41 UTC ±2 hrs. Subtract 4 for EDT.   Its groundtrack is:

Source: Aerospace Corporation

UPDATE, May 7, 2015, 7:45 pm EDT:  JSpOC’s newest prediction is 01:52 GMT May 8, which is 9:52 pm EDT tonight (May 7).

UPDATE, May 7, 2015, 2:05 pm EDT:   Roscosmos has issued a new update, estimating the reentry will occur between 01:13 and 04:51 Moscow Time on May 8.  That is today, May 7, between 6:13 pm and 9:51 pm EDT.  JSpOC’s latest estimate is 01:36 UTC on May 8 which is 9:36 pm EDT tonight.  Aerospace Corp’s latest is May 8, 01:08 UTC  ± 2 hours (subtract 4 for EDT) and it has posted a ground track showing the reentry path.

ORIGINAL STORY, May 7, 2015, 8:27 am EDT:  Russia’s space agency Roscosmos has refined its estimate of when the Progress M-27M spacecraft will reenter Earth’s atmosphere.  Its current estimate is on May 8 between 00:45 and 06:26 Moscow Time, which is May 7 (today) 5:45 pm – 11:26 pm Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).  It plans to issue an update later today.

Russia is not the only source of estimates of the reentry time. 

  • T.S. Kelso’s (@TSKelso) latest calculation is May 8 at 0859 UTC ± 24 hours, which is May 8 (Friday) at 4:59 am EDT.  However, since there is a 24 hour window, that could mean anytime between now (May 7) and Saturday (May 9) morning. 
  • The Aerospace Corporation’s current estimate is May 8 at 23:09 UTC ± 18 hours, which is May 8 at 7:09 pm EDT.  Adjust for the ± 18 hours and that provides a Friday-Saturday window of May 8 at 5:09 UTC – May 9 at 17:09 UTC, or  May 8 at 1:09 am EDT – May 9 at 3:09 pm EDT.
  • The U.S. Joint Space Operations Center (JSpOC) estimate posted on space-track.org is May 8 at 03:32 UTC, which is today, May 7, at 11:32 pm EDT, very close to the end of the window calculated by Roscosmos.

The fact that so many estimates exist illustrates the difficulty in calculating when any space object will reenter in an uncontrolled situation like this.   Many factors must be taken into account including solar activity and the size, shape and composition of the object.   The only factor known with certainty is the boundaries of the latitude on Earth where surviving debris could fall, which is set by the object’s orbital parameters.  In this case, Progress M-27M is in a 51.6 degree orbit, so debris could fall anywhere between 51.6 degrees North latitude and 51.6 degrees South latitude.  Since 70 percent of the world’s surface is water, and much of the land is sparsely populated, the chances of debris hitting a person or building is small, but does exist.

Progress M-27M was launched on a Soyuz- 2.1a rocket from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan on April 28.  A malfunction in the rocket or spacecraft caused it to fail as it reached orbit.  The failure is still under investigation.  NASA refers to it as Progress 59 because it is the 59th Progress to resupply the International Space Station (ISS).   This is the second of four planned Progress resupply flights this year.  The schedule for the remaining two is uncertain until the cause of this failure is understood and rectified. 

ISS is also supplied by two U.S. spacecraft (SpaceX’s Dragon and Orbital ATK’s Cygnus) and Japan’s HTV.  A Dragon is currently attached to ISS and three more launches are planned this year.  An HTV launch is scheduled for August and a Cygnus is expected by the end of the year.  NASA says U.S. operations aboard the ISS will not be affected by the loss of this Progress.

Progress M-27M Expected to Reenter Wednesday or Thursday EDT

Progress M-27M Expected to Reenter Wednesday or Thursday EDT

Russia’s failed Progress M-27M cargo spacecraft is expected to reenter Earth’s atmosphere on Wednesday or Thursday Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), Russia’s Roscosmos space agency said today.  Launched on April 28 EDT, the spacecraft and/or its launch vehicle suffered a failure that left it in the wrong orbit and made it incapable of docking with the International Space Station (ISS) as planned.  The failure is still under investigation.

Progress M-27M was launched on a Soyuz 2-1a rocket at 3:09 am EDT on April 28.  Shortly after reaching orbit, Russian flight controllers began receiving conflicting data from the spacecraft about the deployment of solar panels and rendezvous antennas.  Video from an on-board camera showed the spacecraft rotating several times a minute.  Within a day, the Russians declared that the mission was lost. 

The spacecraft is carrying about three tons of food, fuel and other supplies for the ISS crew. This is the second of four planned Progress missions to ISS this year.  Other spacecraft also resupply the ISS (a U.S. SpaceX Dragon is attached there now and three more are planned this year, a Japanese HTV is scheduled for launch in August, and a U.S. Orbital ATK Cygnus may also be launched this year) so the crew members are fine.

Roscosmos today predicted that the spacecraft will reenter on May 8, 2015 between 1:23 am and 9:55 pm Moscow Time, which is between 6:23 pm May 7 and 2:00 pm May 8 EDT. Most of the spacecraft is expected to burn up during reentry, although Roscosmos said some small pieces may survive. Russia’s official Itar-Tass news agency quotes an unnamed industry official as identifying “more than a dozen spherical tanks” made of “thick-walled metal” as the most likely to survive because of their composition and the fact that they are sheltered by the spacecraft’s hull.

Ordinarily, Progress spacecraft make a controlled deorbit into the Pacific Ocean at the end of their mission, but that is not possible this time.  It is almost impossible to forecast where a spacecraft will reenter in an uncontrolled situation other than knowing its upper and lower latitude bounds which are set by its orbit.  In this case, that is between 51.6 degrees north latitude and 51.6 degrees south latitude.  Since 70 percent of the Earth’s surface is water, and much of the land is sparsely populated, the chances of damage to people or homes is small, but does exist.

Anatoly Zak at RussianSpaceWeb.com reports that experts are focusing on the last three seconds of the rocket’s firing and separation between the rocket and spacecraft as the time when the failure occurred.  Evidence increasingly points “toward an explosion aboard the rocket, which damaged the spacecraft, while some considerable force still propelled both vehicles to different orbits,” he writes, adding the spacecraft reportedly never fired its engines and propellant venting from “lines punctured by a nearby explosion of the third stage” set the spacecraft tumbling.

What's Happening in Space Policy May 4-8, 2015

What's Happening in Space Policy May 4-8, 2015

Here is our list of space policy events for the week of May 4-8, 2015 and any insight we can offer about them.  The Senate is in session this week.  The House is in recess.

During the Week

With the House in recess and Spring in the air, this is a comparatively light week for space policy aficionados.  There are two interesting conferences in Washington, DC — WIA’s Aerospace 2015 on Tuesday and the Humans 2 Mars Summit on Tuesday and Wednesday — but for many the highlight probably will be the SpaceX pad abort test on Wednesday at Cape Canaveral, FL.  It is a test, and a very brief one as NASA and SpaceX keep pointing out, of the abort system for the Dragon spacecraft as part of its certification for carrying NASA astronauts.  

At a briefing on May 1, SpaceX’s Hans Koenigsman joked that if you wait to hear the sound, the test will be over already.  The test does not involve the use of a Falcon 9 rocket.  Instead, eight Super Draco engines integrated into the Dragon capsule will fire for just six seconds, propelling the capsule to an altitude of about 5,000 feet.  Dragon will then descend under parachutes to a water landing 1.5 minutes after ignition.  The landing point is about 1 mile offshore.  Dragon will be recovered and returned to SpaceX’s McGregor, TX facility for analysis.  An instrumented dummy named Buster will be along for the ride to measure g forces and other parameters that an astronaut would experience.   The brief test has a long launch window, 7:00 am – 2:30 pm ET, and Koenigsman urged everyone to be patient — they will do it when they’re ready.

Those and other events we know about as of Saturday are listed below.

Tuesday, May 5

Tuesday-Wednesday, May 5-6

  • Humans 2 Mars Summit (Explore Mars and George Washington University’s Space Policy Institute), George Washington University , Washington, DC (location update:  the conference is being held in different locations on the GWU conference depending on the day; check the event’s website for more information)

Wednesday, May 6

TASS: No Hope Left for Progress M-27M-UPDATE

TASS: No Hope Left for Progress M-27M-UPDATE

Update, April 30, 2015:   Russia’s space agency Roscosmos now predicts Progress M-27M will reenter between May 5-7 rather than May 3-4.

Original Story, April 29, 2015:  Russia’s official Itar-Tass news agency reports today that there is no hope of recovering the Progress M-27M cargo spacecraft launched yesterday.  The spacecraft is loaded with three tons of supplies for the International Space Station (ISS) crew.   What happened to the spacecraft during or shortly after launch is not yet known.

Progress M-27M lifted off from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan on time at 3:09 am Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) yesterday, April 28, 2015.   Whatever went wrong occurred close to the time that the spacecraft separated from the Soyuz rocket’s third stage.   Russian flight controllers received conflicting data about the spacecraft’s status and video from the spacecraft showed that it was spinning.

This morning EDT, Tass reported that the U.S. Joint Space Operations Center (JSpOC) had detected 44 pieces of debris “of unknown origin” in the orbit close to the Progress spacecraft.

A separate Tass story said that Russian space specialists “have agreed that Progress is hopeless, its controlled deorbiting is impossible.”  Three attempts today to communicate with the spacecraft were “futile.”  The report said that the spacecraft would reenter Earth’s atmosphere on May 3-4.

This is the second of four planned Progress missions to the ISS this year.   The other two are scheduled for launch on August 6 and October 22, but clearly those dates may change depending on the results of the investigation into this failure. 

Progress is one of four cargo spacecraft that service the ISS.   Two U.S. companies, SpaceX and Orbital ATK, have developed commercial cargo spacecraft — Dragon and Cygnus respectively.  Japan launches its HTV cargo spacecraft to the iSS.  A SpaceX Dragon is currently attached to the ISS and three more are scheduled for launch this year.  Orbital ATK is recovering from a launch failure last year that destroyed a Cygnus spacecraft and its cargo, but hopes to resume launches later this year.  An HTV is scheduled for launch in August.

NASA said yesterday that none of the cargo on the Progress M-27M was critical to U.S. operations on the ISS.  NASA refers to this as Progress 59 because it is the 59th Progress to be sent to the ISS, but it has a long history that predates ISS.