Category: International

SIA Reports Satellite Services and Manfacturing Revenue Up in 2013

SIA Reports Satellite Services and Manfacturing Revenue Up in 2013

The Satellite Industry Association (SIA) released its annual report on the state of the satellite industry yesterday.  Like the Space Foundation’s report on the space sector more broadly, also released yesterday, the SIA report is full of mostly good news.

The report, prepared for SIA by the Tauri Group, found that global revenues for the satellite industry in 2013 were $195.2 billion, up 3 percent from $188.8 billion in 2012.  Of the four segments of the satellite industry identified in the report, global revenues for only one — the satellite launch industry — fell compared to 2012.

  • Satellite services revenue,  $118.6 billion, up 5 percent
  • Satellite manufacturing, $15.7 billion, up 8 percent
  • Satellite launch industry, $5.4 billion, down 7 percent globally, although the U.S. share grew by 17 percent (from $2.0 to $2.4 billion)
  • Satellite ground equipment, $55.5 billion, up 1 percent

Satellite services in this report includes consumer services (television, radio and broadband); fixed satellite services (transponder agreements, managed network services), mobile satellite services (data, voice); and remote sensing/imaging services.  Satellite manufacturing is self explanatory.  Satellite launch industry includes launch services and launch vehicles.  Satellite ground equipment includes network equipment (e.g. gateways) and consumer equipment (e.g., satellite dishes).

The report is available on the SIA website.

Space Foundation: Space Economy Grew by 4 Percent in 2013

Space Foundation: Space Economy Grew by 4 Percent in 2013

The Space Foundation released its annual report on the state of the space economy today.   It asserts that the global space economy grew by 4 percent in 2013 reaching a new record of $314.17 billion.

Government spending around the world accounts for less than a quarter of that amount, and was less in 2013 compared to 2012 “as significant cuts in the U.S. space budget were only partly offset by growth in the space budgets of other countries.” 

The reduction in U.S. Government space spending was both in civil and national security space primarily because of the sequester.  

NASA’s spending dropped from $17.77 billion in FY2012 to $16.85 billion in FY2013, for example.   (It rebounded to $17.65 billion for the current fiscal year, FY2014.)   Calculating how much the United States spends on national security space is a challenge since so much information is classified and space activities are not grouped together into a single account in the DOD budget.   The Space Foundation estimates that it was $21.72 billion in FY2013.   Adding in funding for other agencies like NOAA and NSF, it uses $41.257 billion as the total for U.S. government space spending in 2013, 9.4 percent less than 2012.

Even with that reduction, the U.S. space program overall still accounted for 55.7 percent of total government spending around the globe in 2013 according to the report.

The growth in the space economy was in the commercial sector.  The report concludes that of the $314.17 billion space economy in 2013:

  • 24 percent was government spending
    • 13 percent U.S.;
    • 11 percent non-U.S
  • 76 percent was commercial
    • 37 percent for commercial infrastructure and support industries;
    • 39 percent commercial space products and services

Commercial space infrastructure includes satellite manufacturing, launch services, space stations, ground stations, and associated equipment.    Commercial space products and services includes revenues from satellite broadcasting (television and radio), communications, and Earth observation.

In terms of the satellite launch industry, there were 81 orbital launch attempts in 2013, of which 78 were successful in placing their primary payloads into orbit.  The Space Foundation counts 23 of those as commercial launches, of which Russia conducted 12, the United States 6, Europe 4, and the multinational Sea Launch consortium 1. 

A brief summary of the report and information on how to purchase the full report is on the Space Foundation’s website.

SpaceX CRS-3 Dragon Returns to Earth

SpaceX CRS-3 Dragon Returns to Earth

SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft splashed down in the Pacific Ocean at 3:05 pm Eastern Daylight Time (12:05 pm Pacific) on May 18, bringing the company’s third operational International Space Station (ISS) cargo mission to a close except for returning the cargo to NASA.

Dragon brought 3,563 pounds of cargo back to Earth, including the results of scientific experiments conducted aboard the ISS.

Neither NASA nor SpaceX provided live TV coverage of the reentry and splashdown, with occasional tweets by SpaceX the only information available.   According to SpaceX, everything went fine.

NASA says that the “precious cargo” is to be extracted from Dragon and returned to Johnson Space Center in less than 48 hours.

Dragon was launched by SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket on April 18 and arrived at the ISS on April 20 delivering 2,500 pounds of supplies, equipment and scientific gear.  It was unberthed from the ISS using Canadarm2 at 9:26 am EDT this morning and moved away from the ISS using three engine burns.   The reentry burn was at 2:12 pm EDT.

What's Happening in Space Policy May 19-25, 2014

What's Happening in Space Policy May 19-25, 2014

Here is our list of upcoming space policy events for the week of May 19-25, 2014 and any insight we can offer about them.   The House and Senate are in the session this week.

During the Week

As the country gets ready to celebrate Memorial Day and honor those who gave their lives defending our country, Congress will be acting on the authorization bill for the Department of Defense (DOD).   The FY2015 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) will go before the House Rules Committee on Monday and Tuesday, with floor action expected later in the week.  Meanwhile the Senate Armed Services Committee (and its subcommittees) will be busy marking up its version of the bill. The DOD authorization bill is the only authorization bill that reliably gets passed year after year despite the many controversies therein.  A big issue this year, of course, is what to do about Russia’s threat to stop providing RD-180 engines for the Atlas V rocket.  The House wants to add about $200 million to start a U.S. program to build a new liquid rocket engine to replace it.  The Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) will be debating it during markups this week.

Also on tap in the House this week is the FY2015 Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS) appropriations bill, which cleared committee on May 8.  It includes funding for NASA and NOAA.  NASA is slated to get a significant increase ($435 million) compared to the President’s request.   Appropriations being a zero sum game, that means other agencies in the CJS bill got less than the President requested.   Time will tell whether champions of the activities that were cut offer amendments to take money from what is recommended for NASA and restore it to the other programs.  NOAA’s satellite programs did comparatively well, though not its strategy for launching three sensors that do not fit on the JPSS spacecraft.  Last year Congress zeroed the “Polar Free Flyer” program and told NOAA to try again.  This year, it is the SIDAR program and House Appropriations zeroed it, too.

Other big events are — in the United States — the Space Foundation’s annual Space Symposium (formerly the National Space Symposium) in Colorado Springs, CO, and — In Europe — the Berlin Air Show in Berlin, Germany.

Lots of other interesting activities as well.  Here is the list of what we know about as of Sunday afternoon.

Monday, May 19

Monday-Tuesday, May 19-20

Monday-Thursday, May 19-22

Tuesday-Wednesday, May 20-21

Tuesday-Sunday, May 20-25

Wednesday, May 21

Wednesday-Friday, May 21-23

Russia Suffers Another Proton Failure – UPDATE

Russia Suffers Another Proton Failure – UPDATE

The launch of a Russian communications satellite, Ekspress-AM4R, on a Russian Proton-M rocket failed today (May 15, 2014 Eastern Daylight Time; May 16 local time in Russia), adding to the country’s increasing list of launch failures since 2010.  Russia’s Itar-Tass news agency reports that the problem occurred in the separation between the second and third stages.

Information is still coming in, but Itar-Tass is quoting an unnamed official at Russia’s space agency, Roscosmos, as saying the problem occurred between the separation of the second and third stages and contact with the Proton rocket “was lost in the 540th second after liftoff”  and “the nose cone did not separate from the rocket.”

Any remaining segments of the Proton-M rocket and its Briz-M upper stage and the satellite probably disintegrated in the upper layers of the atmosphere, Itar-Tass added later in the evening EDT, but small fragments could have made it back to Earth.   Officials were attempting to determine a likely impact area and initiating an investigation into the accident. 

The Ekspress-AM4R satellite was “the highest-powered and technologically” advanced communications satellite in this series.  Ironically, it was a replacement for the Ekspress-AM4 satellite that was stranded in transfer orbit in 2011 because of another launch anomaly.  Yet another in this series, Ekspress-MD2, was stranded in transfer orbit along with an Indonesian communication satellite in 2012.   Ekspress-AM4R was built by Airbus Space and Defence (formerly Astrium) and was insured for 2.5 billion rubles according to Itar-Tass.

Check back here for updates as more information becomes available.   We have a fact sheet of Russian launch failures since December 2010 posted on our website.

Nelson: SASC Will Deal with RD-180 Issue Next Week

Nelson: SASC Will Deal with RD-180 Issue Next Week

In a speech on the Senate floor yesterday (May 14), Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) said that the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) will take up the issue of how to respond to Russia’s declaration that its RD-180 rocket engines cannot be used for launching U.S. military spacecraft when it marks up the FY2015 defense authorization bill next week.

SASC’s Strategic Forces subcommittee will markup its portion of the FY2015 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) on May 20 and the full committee will markup the bill over the subsequent three days (May 21-23).  All sessions of the markup are closed to the public.

Nelson took to the floor to provide a brief history of cooperation between the United States and the Soviet Union/Russia in response to what he said were multiple questions by colleagues and the media.  Nelson has considerable expertise on space matters as chair of the Science and Space subcommittee of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee.  He also flew into space on a 1985 space shuttle mission when he was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives. 

What action SASC is contemplating was not mentioned.  Nelson laid out the issues and rued the fact that U.S.-Russian space cooperation is being impacted by geopolitical events since even during the Cold War the two countries managed to work together in space.  Citing the 1975 Apollo-Soyuz Test Project (ASTP) in particular, he noted that the leaders of the American and Russian crews, Gen. Tom Stafford (Ret.) and Gen. Alexei Leonov (Ret.), remain close friends today and are representative of the close ties between other American astronauts and Russian cosmonauts.  

Emphasizing the complexity of the issues posed if Russia bans sales of the RD-180 engines, he went on to explain that two of NASA’s commercial crew contenders, Boeing and Sierra Nevada, plan to use the Atlas V rocket for their CST-100 and Dream Chaser spacecraft. It is that rocket that uses Russia’s RD-180 engines and would be affected if Russia goes through with a threat issued by Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin earlier this week to prohibit use of Russian rocket engines to launch U.S. military satellites.  While those are not military satellites, Nelson is worried that the ban could affect civilian launches, too. 

Rogozin’s threat was not only about the RD-180 engines for the Atlas V, but also Russia’s NK-33 engines used by Orbital Sciences Corporation for its Antares rockets.   Orbital has a large supply of those engines already in the United States that are refurbished by Aerojet Rocketdyne and redesignated AJ-26.  Antares currently is used only for NASA missions and since Orbital already has the engines here, it is not clear that Rozogin’s threats would disrupt those activities.

The Air Force has a study underway to examine options in case the RD-180s no longer are available. The United Launch Alliance (ULA), which produces and launches Atlas V, says that it has a two-year supply of those engines and could, if necessary, shift satellites to the more expensive Delta IV, which has American-made engines.  Nelson said that the topic “will be an issue” when SASC marks up the NDAA next week and if Rogozin follows through with the threat “we’re going to have to swing into action pretty quick.”

The House Armed Services Committee added about $200 million to the FY2015 Air Force budget to begin development of a new U.S. liquid rocket engine to replace the RD-180 when it marked up its version of the bill.   (The HASC Strategic Forces subcommittee added $220 million, which the full committee approved, but it also reduced that subaccount, Aerospace Propulsion, by $23 million for “liquid rocket engine combustion technologies and advanced liquid engine technologies.”)

Rogozin made his comments in response to sanctions imposed on him and other Russian government officials because of Russia’s actions in Ukraine.  He also said that Russia will have to think about whether to agree with NASA’s plans to extend operations of the International Space Station (ISS) beyond 2020.  He did say, however, that Russia needs the ISS until 2020, suggesting that there are no plans to impact ISS operations before then.   Indeed, three ISS crew members returned to Earth on Tuesday and three more are scheduled for launch on May 28.  Russia is the only country currently capable of transporting crews to and from the ISS since the United States terminated the space shuttle program in 2011.

NASA, ULA Respond to Rogozin Remarks

NASA, ULA Respond to Rogozin Remarks

NASA and the United Launch Alliance  (ULA) responded today to statements by Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin that would affect ULA’s use of Russian RD-180 rocket engines and could affect Russia’s participation in the International Space Station (ISS) after 2020.

As part of the ongoing tense relationship between the United States and Russia because of the Ukraine situation, Rogozin said today via tweets and a story in the Russian media that Russian rocket engines no longer may be used for launching U.S. military satellites; Russia will conduct a cost-benefit analysis of its use of the ISS before deciding whether to continue operations past 2020 (NASA announced in January that it will continue operations through 2024 and clearly had been expecting Russia, at least, to agree); and it will consider terminating the operations of 11 ground stations located in Russia for the U.S. GPS navigation satellite system if the United States does not reciprocate by allowing GLONASS ground stations on U.S. soil.

NASA and ULA each issued statements saying they had received no official notification from the Russian government affecting their activities.  

NASA’s statement in full is as follows:

“Space cooperation has been a hallmark of US-Russia relations, including during the height of the Cold War, and most notably, in the past 13 consecutive years of continuous human presence on board the International Space Station. Ongoing operations on the ISS continue on a normal basis with a planned return of crew tonight (at 9:58 p.m. EDT) and expected launch of a new crew in the next few weeks. We have not received any official notification from the Government of Russia on any changes in our space cooperation at this point.”

ULA’s statement in full is as follows:

“ULA and our NPO Energomash supplier in Russia are not aware of any restrictions.  However, if recent news reports are accurate, it affirms that SpaceX’s irresponsible actions have created unnecessary distractions, threatened U.S. military satellite operations, and undermined our future relationship with the International Space Station.

“We are hopeful that our two nations will engage in productive conversations over the coming months that will resolve the matter quickly.

“ULA and our Department of Defense customers have always prepared contingency plans in the event of a supply disruption.  ULA has two launch vehicles that can support all of customers’ needs.  We also maintain a two-year inventory of engines to enable a smooth transition to our other rocket, Delta, which has all U.S.-produced rocket engines.”

ULA’s complaint about SpaceX is a reference to a lawsuit filed by SpaceX against the U.S. government for awarding a contract to ULA on a sole source basis rather than competing it.  As part of the lawsuit, SpaceX discussed the fact that Rogozin oversees Russia’s space sector and is subject to U.S. sanctions, leading a judge in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to issue an injunction against payments to Russia for RD-180 engines used by ULA for the Atlas V rocket, an injunction that was lifted last week.

 

Revisions to Satellite Export Regulations Released

Revisions to Satellite Export Regulations Released

The State Department and Commerce Department issued interim final rules revising satellite export controls yesterday (May 13, 2014).   The long-awaited revisions to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) will allow easier export of commercial satellites to most countries.

The reforms are part of a broader Obama Administration-led Export Control Reform Initiative intended to make American companies more competitive in international markets.

Draft rules were released last year, allowing interested parties to comment on the planned changes.  The rules released yesterday reflect the input that was received and will remain “interim final rules” for the next six months to allow additional comments.  The State Department’s interim final rule and the Commerce Department’s companion revisions are published in the May 13, 2014 Federal Register.   The two departments share responsibility for export controls. The State Department oversees exports of ITAR-controlled items on the U.S. Munitions List (USML).  The Commerce Department regulates “dual-use” items under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).   Items on the USML are much more closely guarded than those on the EAR because of their greater potential military applications.

The Commercial Spaceflight Federation (CSF) praised the export control reforms, but expressed concern that “almost all commercial human spacecraft” remain on the USML.  CSF President Michael Lopez-Alegria said that while yesterday’s actions should be applauded, “there is still much progress to be made on commercial spacecraft. … We thank the Administration for their work on this critical issue and look forward to continued revisions to ensure the U.S. remains a leader in spaceflight.”  CSF advocates for commercial human spaceflight.

The Satellite Industry Association (SIA), a trade association of commercial satellite operators, service providers, manufacturers, launch service providers, and ground equipment suppliers, hailed the reforms.  SIA President Patricia Cooper said that “With a more modern regulatory environment for exports in place, we look forward to unleashing the full force of American ingenuity and innovation at work in the international market.”

Similarly, the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) congratulated the government for the reforms.  AIA, which represents the U.S. aerospace industry, estimated in 2012 that U.S. manufacturers lost $21 billion in revenue between 1999 and 2009 because of the strict limits placed on exports of commercial satellites in 1999.

Congress imposed the limits in 1999 after a congressional investigation (the Cox Committee) determined that China had gained militarily-important information by launching U.S.-manufactured commercial communications satellites.  Such satellites had been moved from State Department to Commerce Department control under the George H.W. Bush and Clinton Administrations.  In 1999, Congress moved them back to the State Department’s Munitions List and removed the presidential authority to determine which department had control over them — only Congress could make that determination.   The satellite industry immediately began its attempts to return the satellites to Commerce Department control, which now have finally reached fruition after Congress changed the law in 2012.  Exports to China, however, remain prohibited.

Rogozin Says No to Russian Rocket Engines for Military Launches, Not Sure About ISS to 2024

Rogozin Says No to Russian Rocket Engines for Military Launches, Not Sure About ISS to 2024

In a sign of the strained relationships between the United States and Russia over Ukraine, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said today that Russia would not permit the use of its rocket engines for U.S. military launches, questioned whether Russia would support NASA’s desire to extend International Space Station (ISS) operations to 2024, and may stop hosting U.S. GPS stations on Russia soil if there is no reciprocity from the United States.

Rogozin is in charge of Russia’s space sector and was one of the first Russians sanctioned by the Obama Administration in March because of Russia’s activities in Ukraine.  He featured prominently is U.S. news articles about the space program over the past week because a judge at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims enjoined payments by the Air Force or United Launch Alliance for Russia’s RD-180 engines until the government assured the court that such payments did not violate those sanctions.   The government provided those assurances and the injunction was lifted on May 8.

Now the shoe is on the other foot.  Rogozin told Interfax that Russia will not permit the use of Russia engines for U.S. military launches.  RD-180s are used to power ULA’s Atlas V rocket, which is used for many national security space missions.   Russian NK-33 rocket engines, redesignated as AJ-26 engines by Aerojet Rocketdyne, which refurbishes them, are used for Orbital Sciences Corporation’s Antares rocket and the ban may also apply to those engines, although Orbital currently uses Antares only for cargo launches to the ISS for NASA.

Rogozin made his remarks In a series of tweets and to Russia’s Interfax news agency that is cited by Russia Today.  In addition to the comments about Russian rocket engines, he said that Russia will think about whether to continue operating the ISS past 2020.  NASA announced in January that it is extending operations to 2024, although it had not yet reached agreement with the other ISS partners.   In many discussions, NASA officials have indicated that Russia is in agreement with the extension, and it is a matter of getting Europe, Canada and Japan to agree as well.   Rogozin’s statements call that into doubt.  He said Russia currently projects that it needs ISS until 2020 and “We need to understand how much profit we’re making by using the station, calculate all the expenses and depending on the results decide what to do next.”

As for GPS, Rogozin said Russia is considering halting the operations of 11 U.S. GPS stations in Russia beginning on June 1 if the United States does not reciprocate and allow Russian GLONASS stations on U.S. territory.  “We’re starting negotiations, which will last for three months. We hope that by the end of summer these talks will bring a solution that will allow our cooperation to be restored on the basis of parity and proportionality.”

Russia’s request to place GLONASS stations on U.S. territory became controversial late last year, well before the Ukraine situation developed.

Update:  A transcript, in Russian, of the press conference at which Rogozin made these remarks and that included Russian space agency head Oleg Ostapensko is available at this website.

Three ISS Crew Members Return Home, Politics Notwithstanding

Three ISS Crew Members Return Home, Politics Notwithstanding

The United States and Russia may be throwing barbs, sanctions and threats at each other, but relationships over International Space Station (ISS) operations appear unaffected.  A Russian, an American and a Japanese returned to Earth tonight (Eastern Daylight Time) from the ISS, landing in Kazakhstan after 188 days in space.

Russian cosmonaut Mikhail Tyurin, NASA astronaut Rick Mastracchio and Japanese astronaut (and former ISS commander) Koichi Wakata landed in their Soyuz TMA-11M spacecraft at 9:58:30 pm EDT tonight, May 13, 2014 (7:58:30 am May 14 local time at the landing site) under clear blue skies. 

Two Russians (Oleg Artemyev and Alexander Skvortsov) and an American (Steve Swanson) remain aboard the ISS awaiting replacements for the three who landed tonight.   Reid Wiseman (NASA), Alexander Gerst (ESA/Germany) and Maxim Suraev (Russia) are scheduled for launch on May 28.

Earlier today Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said that Russia would not allow its rocket engines to be used to launch U.S. military satellites (the RD-180 is used to power United Launch Alliance’s Atlas V rockets), said it was considering turning off 11 GPS stations in Russia as of June 1 if the United States does not reciprocate and allow stations for Russia’s GLONASS system on U.S. soil, and hinted that it might not agree to NASA’s plan to keep ISS operating after 2020.   Nothing was said about changes to current ISS operations and NASA insists that everything is AOK on the ISS.