Category: International

NASA Reacts to China's Lunar Landing, LRO Images Chang'e-3 and Yutu

NASA Reacts to China's Lunar Landing, LRO Images Chang'e-3 and Yutu

NASA says it is looking forward to China publicly releasing the scientific results from the Chang’e-3 lander and Yutu rover that arrived on the lunar surface earlier this month.  Yesterday, NASA scientists released a photo of the duo taken by the U.S. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter that has been in lunar orbit since 2009.

The photo was one of several taken by LRO’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) on December 24-25 when its orbit took it over the landing site in the Sea of Rains (Mare Imbrium).  The highest resolution image (below) was taken when LRO was nearly overhead at approximately 150 kilometers on December 25, with a pixel size of 150 centimeters.  NASA’s LRO team noted that the Yutu rover is only 150 centimeters wide, but shows up in the image because its solar arrays are effective at reflecting sunlight and the Sun was setting so the rover had a distinct shadow.

Source:  NASA website.  Caption:  LROC NAC view of the Chang’e 3 lander (large arrow) and rover (small arrow) just before sunset on their first day of lunar exploration.  LROC NAC M1132582775R, image width 576 m, north is up.  Image credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University. 

Chang’e is China’s mythological goddess of the Moon and Yutu is her companion, a jade rabbit.   Chang’e-3 and Yutu landed on the Moon on December 14, the first survivable landing on the Moon since the Soviet Union’s Luna 24 in 1976.

NASA’s Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE), launched on September 3, 2013, also is in lunar orbit although its path does not pass over the Chang’e- landing site.  Nevertheless, it did watch for any increase in lunar dust or gases caused by the landing, but did not detect any.   LADEE’s studies were aided by two other NASA spacecraft that are orbiting the Moon, ARTEMIS P1 and P2.  They originally were part of a 5-spacecraft constellation of satellites studying interactions between the Sun and the Earth as part of the THEMIS mission.  After completing their primary missions in 2010, these two spacecraft were placed into lunar orbit to study the Sun’s interaction with the Moon and redesignated ARTEMIS (Acceleration, Reconnection, Turbulence and Electrodynamics of Moon’s Interaction with the Sun).

NASA’s statement on Chang’e-3 and Yutu, issued in response to media inquiries, referenced its ongoing robotic lunar exploration activities and noted that scientists around the world view China’s spacecraft as “a new scientific opportunity.”   NASA’s full statement is as follows:

“After sending 12 humans to the moon’s surface during the Apollo Program, NASA continues to explore the moon with three current missions, all in an effort to learn more about our nearest neighbor and enable exploration to an asteroid and Mars. We welcome all countries’ peaceful exploration of space, and look forward to China’s public release of the scientific results from the Chang’e 3 mission to the moon. NASA satellites will examine the lander’s arrival from various perspectives, and scientists around the world view it as a new scientific opportunity that could potentially enhance studies and observations of the lunar atmosphere that could contribute to our journeys to those farther destinations.”

The activities of the U.S. spacecraft may help dispel a misimpression among some members of the public that the United States is not doing very much in lunar exploration while China is taking the lead.  That viewpoint was exemplified by a reporter at the State Department’s daily briefing on December 16.  Neither the reporter nor the State Department briefer were well informed about the U.S. or Chinese space programs, but the gist of the conversation was the reporter asking whether China was taking the lead and how much its global standing would therefore benefit. 

Indeed, many of the news reports about China’s achievement suggest that the United States is losing its leadership position while China is forging ahead, which is hardly the case as LRO, LADEE and ARTEMIS demonstrate today (not to mention the long history of U.S. lunar exploration including the Apollo landings).  Unfortunately, the State Department spokeswoman did not make that case.  She at least knew that China had recently landed something on the Moon and offered congratulations, but demurred on answering any of the questions saying she simply did not know and would have to check with others.

Mars One Culls List of Potential One-Way-Trip-to-Mars Applicants

Mars One Culls List of Potential One-Way-Trip-to-Mars Applicants

Mars One, the Dutch non-for-profit foundation advocating one way trips to Mars for people who want to settle the Red Planet, announced today that it chose 1,058 candidates to proceed to round 2 of its selection and training process.

Mars One said in September that it had “received interest” from 202,586 people to make one-way trips to Mars, four people at a time beginning in 2023.  That statement left open the question of how many of those who expressed interest actually applied, a process that involved paying a fee.  However, today’s press release said that the 1,058 candidates chosen for the next step were drawn “from an applicant pool of over 200,000.”   Applicants were asked to pay “a small administration fee that varies across nations according to their per capita GDP” to make the program “equally accessible” for everyone and to reduce “the number of insincere entries.”  Mars One did not announce how much revenue it earned from the applications.  The foundation says it plans opportunities for people to apply “regularly” in future years.

Mars One plans to finance its effort through crowdsourcing (through Indiegogo), exclusive partnerships, selling broadcasting rights, “involvement with high net worth individuals,” and “revenues from intellectual property.”  The next steps in the selection process were not announced today because Mars One said it is still in negotiations with media companies for the rights to televise the process. 

Earlier this month, Mars One, Lockheed Martin and Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd. (SSTL) held a press conference in Washington, D.C. to announce the first step in Mars One’s plans — a robotic lander/orbiter combination to be launched in 2018.  The orbiter would be a communications satellite built by SSTL, while the lander would be provided by Lockheed Martin based on the Mars Phoenix spacecraft it built for NASA, which landed on Mars in 2007.  The Mars One lander will carry a camera providing continuous video (though the communications satellite), a robotic arm to scoop up Martian material, an experiment to produce liquid water from that material, and a test of a thin film solar panel to provide power.   

The Mars One contracts with Lockheed Martin and SSTL are for mission concept studies only at this point.  Mars One co-founder and CEO Bas Lansdorp declined to say how much the robotic mission would cost, saying that is part of the mission concept studies.  He did say, however, that the study contract with Lockheed Martin is for $250,000 and the SSTL contract is for 60,000 Euros (about $83,000).

Mars One’s effort should not be confused with a completely separate and quite different proposal to send people to Mars called Inspiration Mars.  The latter effort is led by Dennis Tito, an American multimillionaire best known in space circles as the person who paid Russia a reported $20 million to fly to the International Space Station as the first ISS “tourist.”   Tito wants to send a man and a woman, preferably married, on a round-trip flight to Mars in 2018, but they will not land.  The closest they will come is 100 kilometers above the surface as they fly past on a “boomerang” trajectory that returns them to Earth.

One similarity between Mars One and Inspiration Mars is that both have evoked a lot of skepticism not only because of the expected cost and ambitious schedule, but the risk.  NASA has not determined how to protect astronauts from the harmful radiation environment in space for long duration missions, never mind how to support people living on the surface of another planetary body.  NASA’s own current plan is to send people to orbit — not land on — Mars in the 2030s, with a human landing at an indefinite time thereafter.

Bansdorp and Tito both are focused on 2018 — Bansdorp for the robotic mission, Tito for his crewed mission —  because it is an excellent opportunity to launch to Mars from an energy standpoint.  Earth and Mars are  properly aligned in their orbits around the Sun every 26 months to allow such journeys, but some of those opportunities are better than others.   January 2018 is one of the best.  An equivalent opportunity will not be available for 15 years after that.  Bansdorp wants to launch his first four-person crew in 2023, which is not a good energy opportunity.  He has not said what launch vehicle he plans to use.

Tito’s plan to launch only two people at the best energy opportunity requires a very big rocket.   He determined that the only launch vehicle capable of launching the requisite mass that might be available in 2018 is NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS), but it will not be ready under NASA’s current schedule.  SLS’s first flight — without a crew — is currently scheduled for 2017 and the first flight with a crew is not until 2021.   Tito told a House Science, Space and Technology Committee hearing in November that, after initial studies, he now believes this primarily should be a NASA mission.  He estimates it will cost $1 billion and wants NASA to provide 70 percent of that.  NASA replied that it is “unable to commit to sharing expenses” with Inspiration Mars, but “we remain open to further collaboration.”

For its part, Mars One stresses that it is not a government program and is not looking for government money.  

 

President Signs FY2014 Defense Authorization Into Law

President Signs FY2014 Defense Authorization Into Law

President Obama signed the FY2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law yesterday, sustaining a record that spans more than 50 years of enacting this annual law despite the ups and downs of Washington politics.

The law provides a total of $607 billion for defense:  $527 billion as the base budget plus $80 billion in Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) such as the war in Afghanistan.

Among the provisions related to national security space activities in the bill as passed by Congress and explained in a joint explanatory statement from the House and Senate Armed Services Committees are the following (“sec.” refers to section numbers in the bill):

  • Prohibits the President from allowing foreign governments to place monitor stations for navigation satellite systems on U.S. territory without the approval of the Secretary of Defense (SecDef) and Director of National Intelligence (DNI).  The provision apparently is aimed at a request by Russia, which is being considered by the State Department and is opposed by DOD and CIA, to place monitor stations for Russia’s GLONASS navigation satellite system in the United States.  The stations would make GLONASS more accurate. (sec. 1602(b))
  • Prohibits the SecDef from entering into contracts for commercial satellite services with a “covered foreign entity in a covered foreign country” if there is a reasonable belief that the “covered foreign entity has an ownership interest that enables that government to affect satellite operations.”  The provision includes a “7-day notice-and-wait” period. (sec. 1602 (a))   Covered foreign country is as defined in sec. 1261 (c)(2) of the FY2013 NDAA (P.L. 112-239; 126 Stat. 2019).
  • Requires the DOD Executive Agent for space to certify to the congressional defense committees that the SecDef is carrying out the Operationally Responsive Space (ORS) program in accordance with law (10 U.S. C. 2273a), and prohibits spending more than 50 percent of the funding for the Space-Based Infrared System modernization initiative wide field of view test bed until that occurs.  Also requires a report within 60 days of enactment on a potential mission that would “seek to leverage all  the policy objectives of the [ORS] program in a single mission.” (sec. 220)
  • Requires the DOD Executive Agent for Space to do a study on operationally responsive launch and for the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review that study. (sec. 915)
  • Requires the Secretary of the Air Force “to develop and implement a plan to ensure the fair evaluation of competing contractors in awarding a contract to a certified evolved expendable launch vehicle [EELV] provider.”   The joint explanatory statement adds that this “should not be construed as direction regarding ongoing procurement or any aspect of source selection criteria.”  Also requests GAO to review the Air Force EELV acquisition strategy and brief Congress before the Air Force releases a draft request for proposals.  (sec. 145
  • Requires the SecDef and DNI to contract with the National Research Council for a review of near- and long-term threats to U.S. national security space systems and to take into account the affordability and technical risk of recommended courses of action. (sec. 912)
  • Requires briefings from various DOD officials to the congressional defense committees on DOD’s strategy for the multi-year procurement of commercial satellite services. (sec. 913)
  • Requires the Commander of U.S. Strategic Command to notify Congress of each attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade or  destroy a U.S. national security space capability within 48 hours of determining that such an attempt occurred and to provide additional information within 10 days.  Congress notes in the joint explanatory statement that this is not intended to be a duplicative process, is not intended to be a notification of every anomaly, and is only for when there is reason to believe it was an intentional attempt. (sec. 911)
  • Requires the SecDef to report to the congressional defense committees on the space control mission of DOD.  The joint explanatory statement states that Congress believes the nature of DOD’s space control mission “is fundamentally changing from purely collision avoidance and cataloging space objects” to ensuring the United States has “the capabilities to respond at the time and place of our choosing” to “purposeful interference with U.S. space systems, including their supporting infrastructure” and the right of “free access and use of space” as called for in DOD’s October 18, 2012 Directive on Space Policy. (sec. 914)
  • Requires the SecDef to submit to the congressional defense committees all materials presented to inform the Deputy SecDef on DOD’s counter space strategy over the past 3 years that resulted in “significant revisions to said strategy” and limits the amount of money that can be spent on the Space Protection Program by $10 million until that occurs. (sec. 916)
  • Requires the Air Force Chief of Staff to submit a report to the congressional defense committees on the Eagle Vision imagery ground station. (sec. 917)
  • Modifies  DARPA’s biennial strategic plan requirement “to make more explicit the linkage between the strategic objections [sic] of the agency with the missions of the armed forces.”   The joint explanatory statement uses DARPA’s Phoenix  program (for satellite servicing and advanced robotics for geosynchronous earth orbit systems) as an example, noting that Phoenix has significant potential, but “may raise complex policy issues, as well as pose as a disruptive technology to established approaches and operations.” (sec. 211)
  • Requires the SecDef to develop a long-term plan for satellite ground control systems and implement a GAO recommendation in its report on Satellite Control Operations (GAO-13-315) concerning the use of dedicated satellite control systems.  (sec. 822)

Congress did not agree to a House-passed provision that would have required an analysis of alternatives to the Precision Tracking Space System (PTSS), which was terminated.

President Obama did not mention any of the space-related provisions in his signing statement, which focuses on provisions regarding Guantanamo.

ISS Astronauts Complete Coolant Loop Repair in Just Two Spacewalks – UPDATE

ISS Astronauts Complete Coolant Loop Repair in Just Two Spacewalks – UPDATE

UPDATE:  NASA reports that the new pump module is working perfectly and systems have been restored to their normal configurations on both cooling loops.

ORIGINAL STORY:  NASA astronauts Rick Mastracchio and Mike Hopkins successfully completed the tasks needed to replace a coolant pump assembly on the outside of the International Space Station (ISS) today.  NASA planned three spacewalks for this repair, but the duo were able to accomplish it in only two.

A flow control valve in one of the two coolant loops on the ISS malfunctioned on December 11 necessitating the repair.  The crew was in no danger and all critical ISS operations were transitioned to the functioning loop, but other systems had to be shut down and science experiments delayed.  The pump itself was working, but with the flow control valve malfunctioning, the ammonia in the coolant loop became too cold to be allowed to flow through a heat exchanger because it might freeze water that also flows through that equipment.  The flow control valve is inside the pump assembly, so the entire pump assembly had to be replaced with a spare, which was the assignment for Mastracchio and Hopkins.   Their first spacewalk was on Saturday and lasted 5 hours and 28 minutes.  Today’s was 7 hours and 30 minutes, including a short period of “bake out” time inside the airlock to decontaminate the crew’s spacesuits, which had come into contact with flakes of ammonia.

A brief test of the new pump assembly while the crew was still outside the station showed that everything is functioning properly, though a full-up test will not take place until later.

Mastracchio and Hopkins were assisted by Japanese astronaut Koichi Wakata, who operated the robotic Canadarm2 from inside the ISS.  For the first spacewalk, Mastracchio was attached to the end of Canadarm2.   Hopkins had that position on the second spacewalk.   Mastracchio now has eight spacewalks under his belt and Hopkins has two.

NASA was anxious to complete this repair quickly both because the Russians have a long scheduled spacewalk of their own coming up on Friday, and soon after that no spacewalks can be performed until January 9 because the Beta angle between the Sun and the ISS preclude such operations because of poor lighting conditions.

These two spacewalks were the first since July when European astronaut Luca Parmitano’s spacesuit helmet filled with water for reasons NASA still does not completely understand.   Modifications were made to the suit and Hopkins wore it on both spacewalks with no problem.   Mastracchio had a problem with the spacesuit he wore on Saturday. Water also entered the suit in that case, but NASA stressed it was unrelated to what happened with Parmitano and was due to a “spacesuit configuration” issue when the crew was back inside the airlock.  Mastracchio wore a different spacesuit today while the other one dries out.

ISS Commander Oleg Kotov and Flight Engineer Sergey Ryazanskiy will do a spacewalk on Friday to install new cameras on Russia’s Zvezda module and retrieve scientific experiments mounted on the outside the ISS.   That spacewalk is due to begin at 8:00 am Eastern Standard Time and will be carried on NASA TV.

The ISS is a joint project of the United States, Russia, Japan, Europe and Canada.  Typically there are six crew members aboard at any one time.  Right now there are three Russians (Kotov, Ryazanskiy and Mikhail Tyurin), two Americans (Mastracchio and Hopkins), and one Japanese (Wakata).

China's Yutu Rover Begins Trek Across Moon's Surface

China's Yutu Rover Begins Trek Across Moon's Surface

China’s Yutu Moon rover is beginning its trek across the lunar surface as shown in a photograph tweeted by China’s official Xinhua news agency yesterday.  The rover was deployed from China’s Chang’e-3 lander on December 15, the day after the duo settled onto the lunar surface. .

On December 22, Yutu and Chang’e-3 took pictures of each other for the last time.  Xinhua tweeted (@XHNews) a compelling photo of Yutu as it moved away from Chang’e-3.   The photo that Xinhua tweeted shows the rover on the surface looking out towards the vastness and blackness of space. 

Source:  Tweet from Xinhua News @XHNews, Dec. 22, 2013 

Oddly, the link in the tweet is to a Xinhua story that, while dated December 22, shows an earlier photo of Yutu taken on December 15; that photo prominently displays China’s flag.   Presumably the flag is on one side of the rover and the photo above is of the other side as it moves away from Chang’e-3.

Source:  Xinhuanet.com, with the caption : “Screen shows the photo of Yutu moon rover taken by the camera on the Chang’e-3 moon lander during the manual-photograph process, at the Beijing Aerospace Control Center in Beijing, capital of China, Dec. 15, 2013.  The moon rover and the moon lander took photos of each other Sunday night, marking the complete success of the Chang’e-3 lunar probe mission.”

A search of the English-language websites for Xinhua, CCTV and China Daily failed to turn up the tweeted photograph.  Daniel Fischer (@cosmos4u) pointed us to this cnr.cn website that has the tweeted photo and indeed the logo at the bottom of that photo states cnr.cn is the source.  It is a Chinese language website, so we appreciate the help. 

It seems odd that China is tweeting the December 22 photo presumably to draw global attention to its achievement, but doesn’t post it on its English-language websites.  Also, the December 22 Xinhua story emphasizes that Yutu took a photo of Chang’e-3 showing the Chinese flag on the lander, the first time this was possible because in earlier photo shoots the flag was not visible from Yutu’s camera.  That photo of Chang’e-3 also is not posted on China’s English-language news websites.

Chang’e-3 and Yutu landed on the Moon on December 14, 2013.  They are China’s first lunar lander/rover and the first spacecraft to make a survivable landing on the Moon since the Soviet Union’s Luna 24 in 1976.    

Yutu is beginning its trek after what the Chinese media call a “nap” from December 16 – December 21 when it turned off its subsystems during a period of high temperatures on the lunar surface.  The rover is expected to function for about three months; the Chang’e-3 lander for one year.

China says this mission completes its second phase of lunar exploration and the next phase will involve sample return spacecraft, Chang’e-5 and Chang’e-6.  Xinhua’s December 22 story states that Chang’e-5 will launch in 2017.  No mention is made of Chang’e-4, which earlier was described as a backup to Chang’e-3 that now will be used to test technologies for the sample return missions.

Chang’e is China’s mythological goddess of the Moon.  Yutu is her pet jade rabbit.

China’s lunar efforts come decades after the Soviet Union and United States initiated lunar exploration with robotic probes and, for the United States, astronauts. The United States returned 380 kilograms of lunar material during the six Apollo lunar landings between 1969 and 1972.  The last three Apollo crews (Apollo 15, 16 and 17) had “moon buggies” — rovers in which they traveled over the lunar surface to explore areas further from their landers than possible on foot.   The Soviet Union returned 330 grams of lunar soil to Earth using three robotic probes (Luna  16, 20 and 24) and landed two robotic rovers (Lunokhod 1 and Lunokhod 2) during the early 1970s.  The United States, Europe, Japan and India have sent spacecraft to orbit and/or impact the Moon since then, but no landers.

ISS Astronauts Prepare for Christmas Eve Spacewalk

ISS Astronauts Prepare for Christmas Eve Spacewalk

NASA astronauts Rick Mastracchio and Mike Hopkins are getting ready for their second spacewalk to fix a coolant loop problem on the International Space Station (ISS).  The spacewalk is scheduled to begin at 7:10 am ET tomorrow, Christmas Eve.  NASA TV coverage begins at 6:15 am ET.

NASA planned three spacewalks to replace the coolant pump assembly, but Mastracchio and Hopkins made quick work of their tasks during the first spacewalk on December 21.   That spacewalk lasted 5 hours and 28 minutes instead of the planned 6 hours and 30 minutes, but they completed so many of the steps that NASA expects them to complete everything during the second spacewalk tomorrow and a third will not be necessary.

A long-planned Russian spacewalk is scheduled for Friday for unrelated tasks.   After that, no spacewalks can take place until January 9 because of the Sun’s Beta angle relative to the ISS which does not allow proper lighting conditions for such operations.

Tomorrow’s spacewalk was delayed by a day to allow the astronauts to get a backup spacesuit ready to replace the one Mastracchio wore on December 21.   NASA has not released many details, but something happened after the astronauts were back inside the airlock that allowed water to enter Mastracchio’s suit.  It is now drying out and can be used in future spacewalks, but not tomorrow’s.

This will be the eighth spacewalk for Mastracchio and second for Hopkins.

Space Policy Events for December 23 – 31, 2013

Space Policy Events for December 23 – 31, 2013

Happy Holidays!   Except for the hard working astronauts aboard the International Space Station, and the need for Congress to officially adjourn for the year, everyone can take a well deserved break for the rest of 2013.

The astronauts completed the first of two or three spacewalks to fix a coolant loop problem yesterday.  A second is scheduled for Christmas Eve day (7:10 am ET) and a third could be scheduled if needed.   The second was delayed by a day so the astronauts can get a backup spacesuit ready for Rick Mastracchio to wear because something went awry with the one he wore yesterday.  Details are pending.

The House and Senate have completed their legislative work for the year, but both chambers are scheduled to meet in “pro forma” sessions this coming week, the House tomorrow and the Senate on Tuesday.  The Senate meeting will take place only if the House has not approved an adjournment resolution by then.  Chances are that’s what the House will do tomorrow, so the Senate session is tentative.

Things will get hopping very quickly in the New Year with the winter meeting of the American Astronomical Society on January 5-10, NASA’s Small Bodies Assessment Group (SBAG) on January 8-9,  the International Space Exploration Forum with ministers of more than 30 space-faring countries on January 9, and the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) Heads of Agencies Summit on Exploration on January 9-10.   All of those meetings will take place in the Washington, D.C. area.  

Oh, and Congress is expected to return to work that week, too; the Senate on January 6 and the House on January 7.

So enjoy the holiday break — it’s busy, busy, busy after that.

Congress Prohibits GLONASS Stations in US Without DOD/DNI Approval

Congress Prohibits GLONASS Stations in US Without DOD/DNI Approval

The final version of the FY2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that just cleared Congress includes language prohibiting the President from allowing Russia to put GLONASS monitor stations on U.S. soil without the approval of the Secretary of Defense (SecDef) and Director of National Intelligence (DNI).

The State Department has been considering a Russian request to place monitor stations within the United States for Russia’s GLONASS navigation satellite system, its equivalent of the U.S. Global Positioning System (GPS).   The stations would increase the accuracy of GLONASS.   GLONASS and GPS are elements of a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and U.S. objectives with regard to GNSS are to ensure compatibility, achieve interoperability, and promote fair competition in the marketplace.

No agreement has been struck to allow GLONASS stations in the United States, but the possibility raised concerns in the Department of Defense and the Intelligence Community that became public in an article in the New York Times last month.

The language in the NDAA (sec. 1602(b)) prohibits the President from authorizing or permitting “the construction of a global navigation satellite system ground monitoring station directly or indirectly controlled by a foreign government” on U.S. territory unless the SecDef and DNI “jointly certify” to Congress that any such ground station “will not possess the capability or potential to be for the purpose of gathering intelligence in the United States or improving any foreign weapon system.”  The SecDef and DNI may jointly grant a waiver to that requirement if certain conditions are met, however.   The section includes a 5-year sunset clause so will be in effect for only 5 years from the date the President signs the bill into law.

The National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation and Timing Advisory Board advises the government on issues concerning GPS and GNSS.  It was briefed on Russia’s proposal at its May 7-8, 2013 meeting and expressed no concerns according to the meeting’s minutes.  It received another briefing at its December 3-4, 2013 meeting.  The minutes of that meeting are not available yet, but the presentation by Ken Hodgkins, Director of the State Department’s Office of Space and Advanced Technology, points out that “no final decisions have been made” and Russia’s proposal has “evolved” based on discussions that have taken place already.

The FY2014 NDAA cleared its final congressional hurdle on Thursday, passing the Senate by a vote of 84-15.  The President is expected to sign it.

Spacesuit Problem Delays Second ISS Spacewalk to Tuesday

Spacesuit Problem Delays Second ISS Spacewalk to Tuesday

International Space Station (ISS) astronauts Rick Mastracchio and Mike Hopkins had a successful spacewalk today, but the next in the series to fix a coolant loop problem has been delayed by one day to Tuesday, December 24.  The delay will allow time to resize a backup spacesuit for Mastracchio because the one he wore today had a “configuration issue.”

The spacewalk proceeded very well, with tasks accomplished ahead of schedule.  The crew is changing out a coolant loop pump assembly because a flow control value was not correctly regulating the temperature of ammonia used as a coolant.   After about four and a half hours, Mastracchio, a veteran of six spacewalks, and Hopkins, a spacewalk rookie, had disconnected the large, cumbersome troublesome pump assembly and gotten it secured in a new location on the outside of the ISS.

Ground personnel told Mastracchio that they had a list of other tasks they would like the crew to perform as “get ahead” items and asked for his input.  He replied that his vote was to end the spacewalk at that point.  Earlier he had complained that his feet were cold and ground personnel asked about his temperature, suggesting that might be the reason for his decision to call an early end to the scheduled 6.5 hour spacewalk.   Mastracchio replied that there were “a couple of things” involved in his decision and ground personnel soon agreed that it was time to call it a day.   The spacewalkers returned to the airlock and the spacewalk ended after 5 hours and 28 minutes.

What happened after that is not clear.  A NASA statement said only that during “repressurization of the station’s airlock following the spacewaik, a spacesuit configuration issue put the suit Mastracchio was wearing in question for the next excursion  – specifically whether water entered into the suit’s sublimator inside the airlock.”   

The extra day will give the crew time to get a backup spacesuit ready to replace the one Mastracchio used today.

NASA stressed that today’s problem “is not related to the spacesuit water leak” that happened in July when European astronaut Luca Parmitano’s helmet filled with water.  At a press conference on Wednesday, NASA officials cautioned that they could not “rule out water in the helmet again” but said they had developed new procedures and added two pieces of hardware to the suits to deal with such an eventuality.   That did not happen today, however, the agency said:  “Both Mastracchio and Hopkins reported dry conditions repeatedly” during today’s spacewalk.  It was Hopkins, not Mastracchio, who was wearing the spacesuit that malfunctioned during Parmitano’s spacewalk.

NASA scheduled three spacewalks to fix the coolant loop problem, but the tasks were accomplished so readily today that only two may be needed. 

Eric Berger Interviews John Culberson: China-No, Europa-Yes, Asteroid Redirect Mission-No

Eric Berger Interviews John Culberson: China-No, Europa-Yes, Asteroid Redirect Mission-No

The Houston Chronicle’s science writer, Eric Berger, published the text of his interview with Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) in his blog today.  Culberson is viewed as the likely successor to Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) as chair of the House Appropriations subcommittee that funds NASA assuming Republicans retain control of the House in next year’s elections.  Wolf is retiring.

Culberson is already a member of the Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS) subcommittee and he and Wolf work closely together and share similar views.   Highlights from Berger’s interview, which can and should be read in its entirety on Berger’s SciGuy blog or as an article in today’s newspaper, include the following (his full answers provide more context than these brief excerpts):

  • Regarding NASA’s proposed Asteroid Redirect Mission:  “It’s not gonna happen.”
  • On whether NASA instead should focus on returning humans to Moon:  “Yes.  Absolutely.”   (Wolf wrote to President Obama yesterday saying the same thing.)
  • On whether he agrees with Wolf on not allowing U.S.-China space cooperation:  “Yes.”
  • On planetary science and a mission to Jupiter’s moon Europa:  “…I’m particularly energized about the planetary science program… I’m certain that there’s life elsewhere in the universe. And I’m also certain that the first place we will discover life on another world is Europa.”

Culberson represents a district that includes Houston, home of NASA’s Johnson Space Center, and he notes in the interview that he is “absolutely devoted to all of NASA and all its missions,” but believes that robotic planetary exploration does not get sufficient attention in Congress.