Category: Space Law

HASC Told China's Counterspace Capabilities "Extremely Serious"

HASC Told China's Counterspace Capabilities "Extremely Serious"

Ashley Tellis of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace told the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) today that China’s counterspace capabilities are “extremely serious” and “on a par” with its offensive cyber operations.   The only issue on which witnesses disagreed was on the value of diplomacy and a Code of Conduct in addressing the threat.

Also testifying at the HASC hearing today were Robert Butterworth of Aries Analytics and Michael Krepon of the Stimson Center.  The hearing was before the HASC subcommittees on Strategic Forces and on Seapower and Projection Forces.

Tellis asserted that the “current and evolving counterspace threat posed by China to U.S. military operations … is extremely serious and the threat ranks on par with the dangers posed by Chinese offensive cyber operations to the United States more generally.”  He added that the “diversity and complexity” of China’s counterspace activities make them “particularly problematic.”  He listed a spectrum of capabilities from direct ascent and co-orbital antisatellite (ASAT) programs to electromagnetic warfare to directed energy and radio frequency weapons as well as computer network attack capabilities.

Butterworth and Krepon did not disagree with that characterization.   The question was what the United States should do in response.

Once again there was agreement that the United States needs more resilient military satellite capabilities perhaps based on a “disaggregated” architecture.  That term refers to building systems based on more, smaller satellites rather than a few large ones so that if one fails, others can compensate and might be easier to replace quickly.   Butterworth also stressed that U.S. military planners need to integrate space operations into the “joint fight, the contribution of space to US combat capability.”

Krepon offered that the United States needs to retain capabilities to respond to threats to space systems “in ways of our choosing if someone messes with us,” though he does not support developing dedicated systems because existing systems have sufficient latent capabilities.

All three also were unified on the need for improved Space Situational Awareness (SSA) to deter an attack or to be able to attribute an attack if one occurs.  “The extent to which we can deter depends on how much we know ahead of time.  If the committee underfunds [SSA] then our deterrence capabilities can be diminished even if we’re doing the other things right,” Krepon warned.

Tellis added that SSA “is the foundation for any kind of defensive counterspace. … We certainly have to put resources first and foremost into [SSA] because nothing else with respect to defensive counterspace is going to work” without it.  Butterworth emphasized that SSA is needed “from orbit, and some of those orbits should be very high so we are looking down” and threats can be detected from “all angles.”

The witnesses parted ways, however, on the role of diplomacy and a Code of Conduct for space activities and a related issue of whether China understands the consequences of attacking U.S. space systems.

Krepon argued strongly for diplomacy in addition to other measures for responding to the threat.   He compared the situation today in U.S.-China relations to the U.S.-Soviet relationship during the Cold War.   During the Cold War, he explained, the United States and Soviet Union had ongoing diplomatic exchanges that allowed each an understanding of the other’s motivations and where to draw the line.  Those dialogues led to several treaties.  With regard to today’s threats to space systems, “we can’t do treaties in space … but we can do… a Code of Conduct that establishes rules of responsible … behavior.”

Krepon doubts whether China really understands the consequences of attacking U.S. satellites because the United States and China are not engaged in similar dialogues.  Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN) called that a “startling revelation.”   Krepon continued that he sees a “dysfunction in China between the political leadership and the military” that adds to his concern and suggested that a country-to-country dialogue would put all the parties at the same table talking about “red lines.”

Butterworth disagreed.  He believes China understands completely that attacking U.S. satellites “means war.”  He dismissed the value of a Code of Conduct — “finding ways to negate the U.S. military space advantage is a compelling strategic requirement for China.  It won’t be moderated by proselytizing space norms or deterrence by démarche or a Code of Conduct for good guys in space.”

Space Policy Events for January 27-31, 2014

Space Policy Events for January 27-31, 2014

The following space policy events may be of interest in the week ahead.  The House and Senate are in session.

During the Week

President Obama will deliver his State of the Union address on Tuesday night.  There are no rumors that the space program will figure in his speech, but anything is possible.  Tuesday is, after all, the 28th anniversary of the space shuttle Challenger tragedy.

In fact, this is the week that commemorates the loss of the Apollo 1 crew on January 27, 1967; the Challenger crew on January 28, 1986; and the space shuttle Columbia crew on February 1, 2003.  NASA and the Air Force will hold a ceremony tomorrow (Monday) at Launch Complex 34 to remember the Apollo 1 crew and NASA will hold its annual Day of Remembrance for all three crews on Friday according to Florida Today (we could find no mention of these events on NASA HQ or Kennedy Space Center websites, so don’t have any other details).

Apart from that, perhaps the most notable event coming up this week is Tuesday’s hearing before two subcommittees of the  House Armed Services Committee on China’s counterspace program.  Bob Butterworth from Aries Analytics, Michael Krepon from the Stimson Center, and Ashley Tellis from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace are the witnesses — 3:30 pm ET, 2118 Rayburn (and via webcast at the committee’s website).

Here’s the list of everything we know about as of Sunday afternoon.

Monday, January 27

Tuesday, January 28

Tuesday-Wednesday, January 28-29

Thursday, January 29

President's FY2015 Budget Request to Be One Month Late

President's FY2015 Budget Request to Be One Month Late

President Obama will submit his FY2015 budget request to Congress on March 4 — a month late — according to news reports.  

By law, the President is supposed to submit each year’s budget request on the first Monday of February.  Delays in reaching agreement on budget bills in recent years have meant consequent delays in submitting requests for the next year and FY2015 will be no exception.

The Hill and Politico are citing White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) spokesman Steve Posner as saying today that March 4 is the date for the FY2015 budget submission to Congress.  Last year, the budget was not sent to Capitol Hill until April 10, so, comparatively speaking, this is an improvement.

The Bipartisan Budget Act agreed to in December set spending caps for both FY2014 and FY2015, which may make the FY2015 appropriations process easier than it has been in recent years.   The cap for FY2015 is $1.014 trillion for discretionary (defense and non-defense) spending, compared to $1.012 trillion for FY2014. 

Space Policy Events for January 20-24, 2014

Space Policy Events for January 20-24, 2014

The following space policy events may be of interest in the week ahead.  The House and Senate are in recess this week.

During the Week

This week is a welcome break from the hustle and bustle that greeted the New Year. 

After an exceptionally busy start to the second session of the 113th Congress, the House and Senate are in recess (Monday is a federal holiday — Martin Luther King day), having passed the appropriations bill that funds the government for rest of the fiscal year.  The frenetic pace in Congress was matched by major American Astronomical Society (AAS) and American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) conferences just outside Washington at National Harbor, MD during the past two weeks, plus the State Department-led International Space Exploration Forum and the International Academy of Astronautics’ (IAA’s) Space Exploration Conference and Heads of Agencies meetings.   Not to mention several significant launches.   It’s been quite a busy couple of weeks!

This week signals a return to a more normal pace.  Here are the meetings we know about as of Sunday afternoon.

Wednesday, January 22

Wednesday-Thursday, January 22-23

Thursday, January 23

Congress Resolves Three Space-Related Issues in First 10 Days

Congress Resolves Three Space-Related Issues in First 10 Days

The second session of the 103rd Congress settled three space-related issues in its first 10 days.  The one with the most impact is passage of the Omnibus Appropriations bill funding space programs for the rest of FY2014.  It also extended third party liability indemnification for commercial space launch companies and renamed the Dryden Flight Research Center after Neil Armstrong.

As we reported earlier, Congress has a plate full of space policy issues this year.   Resolving one major and two more narrowly-focused issues in 10 days isn’t bad. Here’s the list:

Of course, that still leaves plenty of items on the space policy “to do” list and now that the FY2014 appropriations are completed, it’s time to start work on FY2015.  The President is supposed to submit his budget request on the first Monday of February each year, but rumors are it will be delayed because Congress did not reach agreement on the Bipartisan Budget Act — which sets limits on total government spending for FY2014 and FY2015 — until late December.

The second session officially began on January 6, 2014.

Omnibus Appropriatons Bill Clears Congress, Also Extends Third Party Indemnification

Omnibus Appropriatons Bill Clears Congress, Also Extends Third Party Indemnification

Exceeding expectations, the Senate joined the House in passing the FY2014 Omnibus Appropriations bill today.  The next stop is the White House and the President is expected to sign it.  In addition to funding the government for the rest of FY2014, it extends launch liability indemnification for three more years.

The House and Senate earlier passed a three-day extension to the Continuing Resolution (CR) to keep the government operating through Saturday with the expectation that it would take that long for the Senate to pass the Omnibus.  The House passed the Omnibus yesterday (359-67) and sent it to the Senate where action proceeded more quickly than expected.  It passed with a vote of 72-26.

The bill (H.R. 3547 as amended) also extends the FAA’s authority to indemnify commercial launch services companies from certain amounts of liability from third party claims in the event of a launch accident.  In fact, H.R. 3547 originally was the bill that passed the House to extend indemnification for one year.   The Senate amended that bill to extend indemnification for three years instead and sent it back to the House.  There, it was used as the legislative vehicle (a term used to describe a bill originally intended for one purpose, but amended to address different and/or additional issues) for the Omnibus.   In this case, extending indemnification was incorporated into the bill, adopting the Senate position of a 3-year extension — through December 31, 2016.

The bill is commonly called “the Omnibus,” but officially its title is the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014.  It provides a total of $1.012 trillion for discretionary (defense and non-defense) spending in FY2014.

NASA fared pretty well all things considered, receiving $17.65 billion compared to its $17.72 billion request, although the devil is in the details and some programs did better than others.  Congress did not approve the Obama Administration’s proposed reorganization of government STEM education programs, which would have had a significant impact on NASA’s education and public outreach activities, and said NASA had more work to do before Congress would agree to the Asteroid Redirect Mission.

Most satellite programs at NOAA also fared well, except for Jason-3 and Polar Free Flyer.

Space Policy Events for the Week of January 13-18, 2014

Space Policy Events for the Week of January 13-18, 2014

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead.  The House and Senate both are in session.

During the Week

If all goes according to plan, this week Congress will pass an Omnibus Appropriations bill incorporating all 12 regular appropriations bills that will fund the government for the rest of FY2014.  The Omnibus may be introduced as early as this evening (Sunday) or perhaps not until tomorrow, but assuming that goes well, the House would vote on it on Wednesday and the Senate on Saturday (the schedule is set by certain procedural steps that must take place).

The existing Continuing Resolution (CR) that is funding the government expires on Wednesday, January 15, so Congress is expected to pass a three-day CR to extend that to midnight Saturday.  The House and Senate are scheduled to be in recess next week for the Martin Luther King holiday, giving added impetus to get this done before the recess. 

Meanwhile, the American institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) is holding its annual Aerospace Sciences meeting at National Harbor, MD, just outside Washington., DC.  AIAA has adopted a new model for the many conferences it holds each year, bundling them into a fewer number of co-located events.  The collection of AIAA meetings taking place at National Harbor this week is call the Science and Technology Forum & Exposition or SciTech2014.

NASA will hold a number of advisory committee meetings, as well as continuing the celebration of 10 years of Mars rovers (Spirit and Opportunity landed 10 years ago, and, of course, Curiosity landed in 2012).  This week, two events are scheduled for Pasadena, CA, home to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) that manages those programs.  The event on January 16 will be streamed on Ustream.  (A video of the first event, at the National Air and Space Museum, is on YouTube.)

Here is the list of what we know about as of Sunday, January 12.

Monday-Friday, January 13-17

Monday-Tuesday, January 13-14

Tuesday, January 14

Thursday, January 16

Friday, January 17

Congress Hits the Ground Running in 2014

Congress Hits the Ground Running in 2014

The second session of the 113th Congress began in earnest this past week, with budget issues still at the top of the agenda.  Even so, the Senate had time to pass the bill renaming NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC) after Neil Armstrong, an effort in the works since soon after he died in 2012.

That bill, H.R. 667, passed the House almost a year ago.  That actually was the second time the House approved the measure, which is sponsored by Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) who represents the district that includes DFRC and is the House Majority Whip.  The bill originally passed the House on December 31, 2012 in the final days of the 112th Congress, but the clock ran out without Senate action.  Bills that are not passed by the end of a Congress die, so it had to be reintroduced in the current Congress.   The House passed it again on February 25, 2013.   Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced a companion bill in the Senate (S. 1636) in October, but on Wednesday (January 8, 2014), the Senate simply agreed to the House bill.  It now goes to the White House for signature.    It renames DFRC as the Neil A. Armstrong Flight Research Center.   While he is best known as the first man to walk on the Moon, Armstrong spent the early part of his career as a test pilot there.   The bill renames the Western Aeronautical Test Range after Dryden.   Hugh L. Dryden was director of NASA’s predecessor agency, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), and NASA’s first deputy administrator.

On matters of national interest, Congress is working hard to finalize FY2014 appropriations.   The Bipartisan Budget Act signed into law on December 26 sets limits on how much the government may spend in FY2014 and FY2015, but does not actually give money to anyone.   That is the province of the House and Senate  appropriations committees.  They are now finalizing the 12 regular appropriations bills for FY2014.   Numerous news sources report that negotiations on at least half of those are completed, including Defense and the Commerce-Justice-Science bill that funds NASA and NOAA.   Details are not being released while negotiations continue on the rest.   All 12 bills are expected to packaged together into a single “Omnibus Appropriations” bill for consideration by the House and Senate.

The existing Continuing Resolution (CR) that funds the government expires on Wednesday, January 15, and although appropriators reportedly are very close to agreement on everything, they are not there yet and a very short-term CR is likely to be passed as a bridge early in the coming week.  The expectation is that it will be a three-day CR, keeping the government operating through Saturday, January 18, by which time the House and Senate presumably will pass the Omnibus. 

There is little talk this time of a government shutdown.   The 16-day shutdown at the beginning of the fiscal year (October 1-16) seems to have convinced many Republicans that it is not in their best interest to do that again this time, particularly in an election year.  Still, there are many controversial issues and it may be that some are pushed off into the FY2015 budget cycle for resolution.   Strictly speaking the White House should send its FY2015 budget request to Congress on the first Monday in February, but rumors are that it will be delayed until late February or early March because the budget agreement, which affects FY2015 as well as FY2014, was not reached until late in December.

State Department Wants Space Exploration to be "Shared Global Priority"

State Department Wants Space Exploration to be "Shared Global Priority"

At the opening session of the International Space Exploration Forum (ISEF) this morning, Deputy Secretary of State William Burns called for countries “to make space exploration a shared global priority, to unlock the mysteries of the universe, and to accelerate human progress here on Earth.”   As for the United States, he said our commitment to space exploration is growing stronger despite pressures and challenges at home and abroad.

Burns began by noting that this is an “unprecedented time for space exploration” with China’s landing of Chang’-e on the Moon last month, NASA’s Voyager 1 becoming the first manmade object to leave the solar system, the15th anniversary of the International Space Station (ISS), and other discoveries and breakthroughs in the past year “that transformed our understanding of outer space and our way of life here on Earth.”   That is why, he continued, “despite the many pressures, challenges and urgent priorities facing the United States at home and abroad, our commitment to space exploration is only growing stronger.”

Burns laid out three areas for increased collaboration in space:  more countries participating in the ISS; encouraging “entrepreneurial ventures” and supporting “the kind of robust and competitive commercial space sector that is vital to the next era of space exploration”; and increased focus on defending Earth from Near Earth Objects (asteroids and comets) and space debris. 

Most of the one-day meeting being held at the State Department is closed to the public, but media were allowed in for the first hour to hear opening statements by representatives of the United States, Italy, the European Commission (EC) and Japan.   ISEF builds on a process begun in 2011 at an event hosted by the European Union, European Space Agency and Government of Italy, according to the State Department.  Japan will host a second ISEF two years from now.

Burns was joined by White House Science Adviser John Holdren to offer the U.S. viewpoint.   Burns noted that the “Man and the Expanding Universe” statue outside the conference room in which the meeting was taking place was put there 50 years ago to celebrate space exploration and “reminds us that space exploration is not just the preoccupation of scientists and astronauts but a vital undertaking for all those who wish to advance the cause of global peace and prosperity.”

ISEF is billed as “the first-ever ministerial-level meeting to build support for global cooperation in space exploration,” but Burns was there instead of Secretary of State John Kerry; the President of the Italian Space Agency, Enrico Saggese, stood in for Italy’s Minister of Education, Research and Industries (H.E. Maria Chaira Carrozza); and the EC representative, Paul Weissenberg, is the Deputy Director-General of Enterprise and Industry.  Japan, however, was represented by its Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Hakubun Shimomura.

Holdren was scheduled to speak later in the day, but ISEF moderator Jonathan Margolis explained that Holdren’s White House duties required him to speak earlier and, therefore, the speech took place during the part of the program open to the press.   Holdren touted the four-year extension of ISS operations announced yesterday and the Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) proposed by the Obama Administration a year ago.   Congress has had a mixed reaction to ARM and its decision on whether to allow NASA to proceed presumably will be known when FY2014 appropriations are finalized, hopefully later this month.  Today, however, Holdren made clear his enthusiasm for the mission and said that he knew NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden would be happy to hear from any countries that would like to be involved.

Congress Returns to Work With a Full Plate of Space Policy Issues for 2014

Congress Returns to Work With a Full Plate of Space Policy Issues for 2014

Many pundits label last year as the “do nothing Congress.”   At the very end, the House and Senate did at least reach agreement on a two-year budget resolution and the FY2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), but a lot did not get done.  Here is a quick synopsis of the civil, commercial and national security space issues facing Congress in the second session of the 113th Congress as it returns to work this week.  The Senate meets tomorrow (Monday), and the House on Tuesday.

Third Party Liability for Commercial Launch Services.  Perhaps the first space-related issue they will tackle is extending third party liability indemnification for commercial launch services providers.  The House and Senate committees with jurisdiction — the House Science, Space and Technology (SS&T) Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee — agree that the FAA’s authority to indemnify commercial launch services companies for certain amounts of liability for third party claims in case of a launch failure should be extended again.  They disagree on the length of time for the extension.  Democrats on the House SS&T Committee want to limit the extension to one year so additional hearings can be held on the need for indemnification.   The Senate committee and House SS&T Republicans want three years.  Industry would prefer a longer extension, preferably making the authority permanent.

The House passed a one year extension (H.R. 3547) on December 2.  The Senate passed the House bill on December 12, but with an amendment extending it for three years.  That meant the bill had to go back to the House.  By then, however, the House had completed its legislative business for the year and the clock ran out.  The indemnification authority expired on December 31.  This is an important matter for U.S. launch services providers, however, and it would not be surprising to see an extension passed early this year as a stand-alone bill or as part of the anticipated Omnibus Appropriations Act.

FY2014 Appropriations.  Speaking of an Omnibus Appropriations Act, the mood in Washington is relatively upbeat that a bill to fund the government for the rest of FY2014 can pass before the existing Continuing Resolution (CR) expires on January 15.   The Bipartisan Budget Act (H. J. Res. 59) that cleared Congress in December set the limits of how much money Congress can appropriate for FY2014, but the actual task of appropriating those funds is the province of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees.  They have been working diligently over the holidays crafting the 12 regular appropriations bills within the limits set by the budget act. 

Three of those 12 bills are of particular interest from a space policy standpoint: Defense (H.R.. 2387/S. 1429); Commerce-Justice-Science, which includes NASA and NOAA (H.R. 2787/S. 1329); and Transportation-HUD, which includes the FAA’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (H.R. 2610/S. 1243).  The expectation is that all 12 bills will be bundled together into a single Omnibus Appropriations bill for consideration by the House and Senate.

The total amount for defense and non-defense discretionary spending in FY2014 was set at $1.012 trillion, a figure half way between what the House and Senate each had earlier approved. That does not necessarily mean that the amount for any particular agency like DOD, NASA or NOAA will be half way between what the House and Senate Appropriations Committee separately approved, however.  (For NASA, the House Appropriations Committee approved $16.6 billion; the Senate Appropriations Committee approved $18.0 billion.) Also, the budget act did not replace the sequester, but did provide $63 billion in relief from the effects of the sequester split equally between defense and non-defense spending over two years.  All in all, the most dire predictions may be avoided and the budget outlook is brighter for federal departments and agencies than it was just a few weeks ago, but that hardly means a return to business-as-usual.  Budgets will continue to be constrained across the board and Tea Party Republicans appear determined to continue fighting for deeper cuts.

NASA Authorization.  DOD may have gotten its authorization bill (H.R. 3304) at the eleventh hour, but not NASA.   NASA’s most recent authorization act became law in 2010 and covered the years FY2011-2013.   The policy provisions remain law indefinitely, but the funding authorizations have expired.  The House SS&T committee and the Senate Commerce committee each worked on separate versions of a new NASA authorization bill last year, but they are quite different from each other and neither was actually reported from committee.  Each committee marked up its bill and they were “ordered reported,” but they still have not actually been reported.  (Typically, though not always, a bill is reported from committee before going to the floor of the House or Senate for consideration.)

The two major differences are funding levels and the status of the Obama Administration’s Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM).   The House bill (H.R. 2687) authorizes $16.9 billion, while the Senate bill (S. 1317) authorizes $18.1 billion.   The House bill prohibits spending any funds on ARM; the Senate bill is silent on ARM.  Both bills cleared their committees on party line votes, which is unusual for NASA, traditionally a bipartisan topic.

Intelligence Authorization.   Like NASA, the FY2014 authorization bill for the Intelligence Community did not clear Congress.   It was reported from the House and Senate Intelligence Committees (H.R. 3381/S. 1681) in November, but no further action was taken.  The Senate bill “encourages” the relevant government decision-makers to allow commercial satellite imagery providers to sell imagery with better resolution than what is allowed today (0.25 meter instead of 0.5 meter).  A statement in the unclassified report accompanying the House version of the bill (H. Rept. 113-277) says that it “continues to remove barriers to competition in space” and “advances technologies to enhance U.S. satellite capabilities,” but no further details are provided.

Termination Liability for Certain NASA Programs.   Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) introduced one part of the House committee’s NASA authorization bill as a separate bill in the hope of moving at least that part to the floor for a vote.   Referred to as the “termination liability” bill (H.R. 3625), one portion would change how NASA manages funding for termination liability for contracts for the Space Launch System (SLS), Orion spacecraft, International Space Station (ISS), and James Webb Space Telescope (JWST).  Perhaps more significantly, however, it would require congressional approval before any of those programs could be terminated, which some view as an encroachment on presidential prerogatives.  Congress has the power of the purse under the Constitution and strictly speaking can always countermand a presidential decision to either initiate or terminate a program that requires funding, but this bill explicitly requires congressional approval to terminater these particular programs.  The bill passed the House SS&T committee on a bipartisan vote in December after the top Democrat on the Space Subcommittee, Rep. Donna Edwards (D-MD), convinced committee Republicans to add JWST to the list of protected programs.  Like the NASA authorization bill, H.R. 3625 was ordered reported, but not formally reported.  There is no Senate counterpart at this time.

Weather Forecasting Improvement Act.   The House SS&T Committee approved the Weather Forecasting Improvement Act (H.R. 2413) in December, but, like the others, has not been formally reported.   The bill does not focus on weather satellites, but does clarify that existing law does not prevent the government from buying commercial weather data or placing weather satellite sensors on co-hosted government or private sector satellites.   There is no Senate counterpart to this bill yet, either.

Other Legislation.   A number of other space-related bills were introduced last year, but whether they will see any action this year is somewhere between unlikely and possible.   They include a bill to study an alternative to RD-180 rocket engines (S. 1679), the Suborbital and Orbital Advancement and Regulatory Streamlining (SOARS) Act (H.R 3038), and a bill to rename NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center after Neil Armstrong (H.R. 667 passed the House, but there has been no action on its Senate counterpart, S. 1636). 

Nominations.  The Senate had a major show-down over nominations this year.   Democrats weary of Republicans preventing nominations from coming to the floor under existing Senate rules changed the rules so that only 51 votes instead of 60 votes are needed to bring a nomination to a vote.   Republicans are furious and responded by slowing action on the Senate floor during the chamber’s last days in 2013.   How it will affect Senate business in 2014 remains to be seen.

In the meantime, although Deborah Lee James was finally confirmed as Secretary of the Air Force on December 13, other important space-related nominations did not reach the floor during the first session.  Consequently they must be resubmitted by the President under Senate Rule XXXI paragraph 6.   They include:

  • Kathy Sullivan to be Administrator of NOAA (she is currently acting in that role)
  • Beth Robinson, currently NASA’s Chief Financial Officer, to be Under Secretary of Energy
  • Dave Radzanowski to replace Robinson
  • France Cordova to be Director of the National Science Foundation
  • Jo Emily Handelsman to be Associate Director for Science at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
  • Robert Simon to be Associate Director for Environment and Energy at OSTP

All of these nominations were returned to the President on January 3, 2014 (the end of the first session).