Category: Space Law

Today's NYT: Special Section on Future of the Space Program

Today's NYT: Special Section on Future of the Space Program

The New York Times has a special section today where five experts on U.S. and non-U.S. space programs give their views on “A New Space Race, or Chances to Collaborate”?

The five experts and the titles of their essays are:

  • Bill Nye, CEO of the Planetary Society:  Reach for the Stars, Together
  • Dean Cheng, Heritage Foundation: U.S. Can Help Its Allies’ Efforts
  • Jim Oberg, Author:  Russia Must Choose:  Low Tech or High?
  • Laura Grego and Gregory Kulacki, Union of Concerned Scientists:  With China, Setting Norms

All have diverse backgrounds, but Nye is best known as “Bill Nye, the Science Guy” and recently took over as head the Planetary Society.  Dean Cheng and Greg Kulacki are well known experts on China’s space program.  Jim Oberg is an expert on Russia’s space program in particular and is a consultant to NBC news.  Laura Grego is best known for her work in space security.

Space Policy Events for the Week of February 4-8, 2013

Space Policy Events for the Week of February 4-8, 2013

The following space policy-related events may be of interest in the week ahead.  The House and Senate are in session for part of this week.  (Separate House and Senate Democratic retreats take up some of the days.  The House Democratic retreat is Wednesday-Friday; the Senate Democratic retreat is Tuesday-Wednesday.)

During the Week

Viewers in the Washington, DC area have had to wait until this week to see Space Shuttle Columbia:  A Mission Of Hope on local PBS stations.   Others may have had to wait as well, though it began showing in some parts of the nation on January 31.   Check local listings or visit www.anarticleofhope.com  to determine when it will air in your locality.  The film is about a special Torah carried on space shuttle Columbia by Israeli astronaut Ilan Ramon.

Not on the committee’s public schedule yet, but a possibility this week, is the Senate Armed Services Committee’s markup of the nomination of Chuck Hagel to be Secretary of Defense.  Rumors are that it may be on Thursday.  We’ll post it in the “events of interest” list on the right column of our main website if and when it’s official.

Monday, February 4

Tuesday-Wednesday, February 5-6

Wednesday-Thursday, February 6-7

Friday, February 8

 

SpacePolicyOnline.com Publishes New Fact Sheet on 113th Congress Space-Related Legislation

SpacePolicyOnline.com Publishes New Fact Sheet on 113th Congress Space-Related Legislation

With Senate passage of S. Res. 24 yesterday, our website today is publishing the first edition of its new fact sheet on space-related legislation in the 113th Congress.

The Senate resolution honors the space shuttle Columbia crew on the 10th anniversary of the accident that took their lives.  It joins the Hurricane Sandy relief bill, which includes money for NASA and NOAA, as the first two pieces of space-related legislation in the new Congress. 

We will update the fact sheet —  Legislative Checklist 113th Congress:  Major Space-Related Legislation — throughout the next two years as Congress deals with legislation that affects civil, commercial and national security space activities.

Our previous fact sheets on major space-related legislation in the 111th and 112th Congresses will remain online for those looking for historical information.

Iran Claims Successful Suborbital Launch of Monkey, But U.S. Cannot Confirm

Iran Claims Successful Suborbital Launch of Monkey, But U.S. Cannot Confirm

Iran revealed today that it successfully sent a monkey into space on a suborbital flight and retrieved it alive as a first step in sending humans into space.  The U.S. State Department, however, said it could not confirm that a launch took place or that a monkey was aboard.

The Fars News Agency reported today that the Defense Ministry’s Aerospace Industries Association sent a monkey in a biocapsule aboard a Pishgam (Pioneer) rocket.  The rocket reached 120 kilometers in altitude before returning to Earth.  The monkey was “safe and sound” according to Fars.  The Washington Post published this photo of the monkey apparently taken before its flight.

Source:  Washington Post

U.S. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland was asked at her daily press briefing today if she could confirm the launch.  She replied that she had seen the pictures of “the poor little monkey preparing to go to space … but we don’t have any way to confirm this one way or the other with regard to the primate.”  She later added she could not confirm either the launch or what might have been aboard.  She stated that any Iranian space launch vehicle capable of placing something in orbit would violate U.N. Security Council resolution 1929, adopted in 2010, that prohibits Iran from developing ballistic missile technology.  (This launch was not to orbit, however.)

Iran placed its first satellite, Omid, in orbit in 2009.   It reentered after three months.   Iran sent a rat, turtles and worms on a suborbital flight in 2010 on its Kavoshgar-3 (Explorer-3) rocket.   In March 2011, Iran’s Space Agency launched a test of the biocapsule on Kavoshgar-4.   In the fall of 2012, an attempt to launch a monkey reportedly failed.  The UK’s The Telegraph quoted an Iranian official as saying the launch of Kavoshgar-5 took place between August 23 and September 22, “but was not publicised [sic] because all of its anticipated objectives were not accomplished.”

Iran’s leaders have made clear that launching monkeys is the first step towards sending humans into space.  Initial plans were to launch astronauts in 2024, but Fars said today that a subsequent decision accelerated that date by five years and the goal is now 2019.

Launching monkeys and other animals as precursors to human spaceflight is routine.  Jonathan McDowell of Jonathan’s Space Report has a handy list of all non-human animals who have make suborbital or orbital flights.

 

House Space Subcommittee Members Named for 113th Congress

House Space Subcommittee Members Named for 113th Congress

The House Science, Space and Technology (HSS&T) Committee held its 113th Congress organizational meeting today.  The committee adopted the rosters for the members of its six subcommittees, including the Space Subcommittee.

The committee previously decided to have six instead of five subcommittees this Congress, splitting the Energy and Environment Subcommittee into two.  It also has streamlined the names of the subcommittees, so each is identified with only one word:   Energy, Environment, Space, Technology, Research and Oversight.

The Space Subcommittee still has jurisdiction over aeronautics research (the first “A” in NASA); the renaming did not change that.  The subcommittee will once again be chaired by Rep. Steve Palazzo (R-MS), whose state includes NASA’s Stennis Space Center.  The top Democrat is Rep. Donna Edwards (D-MD), who represents a district very close to NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center where she once worked as a contractor for Lockheed.

The full roster follows.  

Republicans:

  • Chairman Steven Palazzo, Mississippi
  • Ralph Hall, Texas
  • Dana Rohrabacher, California
  • Frank D. Lucas, Oklahoma
  • Michael McCaul, Texas
  • Mo Brooks, Alabama
  • Larry Bucshon, Indiana
  • Steve Stockman,  Texas
  • Bill Posey, Florida
  • David Schweikert, Arizona
  • Jim Bridenstine, Oklahoma
  • Chris Stewart, Utah

Democrats:

  • Donna Edwards, Maryland (Ranking Member) 
  • Frederica Wilson, Florida 
  • Suzanne Bonamici, Oregon 
  • Dan Maffei, New York 
  • Joe Kennedy, Massachusetts 
  • Derek Kilmer, Washington 
  • Ami Bera, California 
  • Marc Veasey, Texas
  • Julia Brownley, California

 

Deep Space Industries Joins Ranks of Asteroid Seeking Companies

Deep Space Industries Joins Ranks of Asteroid Seeking Companies

Deep Space Industries (DSI) is joining the ranks of private companies trying to learn more about — and in some cases extract resources from — asteroids.

At a press conference today, Rick Tumlinson, David Gump and associates revealed a three-prong plan involving the launch of two classes of small spacecraft — FireFly and DragonFly — to respectively search for and return material from asteroids, plus a 3D printer called MicroGravity Foundry to turn asteroid material into metal parts.

Asteroids are of interest to diverse communities: entrepreneurs interested in profiting from their natural resources, which could be brought back to Earth or used to build or maintain space-based facilities; planetary defense experts worried about how to protect planet Earth from a potentially catastrophic collision; and scientists trying to understand the origin and evolution of the solar system.  President Obama also decided that an as-yet-unidentified asteroid should be the next destination for U.S. human spaceflight as a step to sending humans to Mars.

Today’s announcement is the third privately-funded asteroid effort to kick off in less than a year.  Although the goals can overlap to some extent, generally two are in the entrepreneurship category and one in planetary defense.

In April 2012, Planetary Resources Inc. announced similar plans to search for and mine asteroids.   Planetary Resources is focused first on building a small space telescope for launch into low Earth orbit (LEO) to search for asteroids.  It is to be followed by an Interceptor and a Rendezvous Prospector.  When asked today about potential competition, Tumlinson said there is room for many companies and the fact that two exist already means that a new industry is starting.

The B612 Foundation’s goal, announced in June 2012, is not prospecting, but planetary defense.  The foundation plans to launch a space telescope, Sentinel, into a special orbit around the Sun where it can catalog a greater number of Near Earth Objects (NEOs) – asteroids and comets — than can be observed using ground-based telescopes.   Earth has been impacted by large asteroids in the past – the extinction of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago is attributed to the after-effects of such a collision – and near-misses of asteroids are frequently reported in the press.   B612’s idea is that if potentially hazardous NEOs are located enough in advance, there may be time to deflect them.   B612 is not trying to find investors with the long term goal of selling a product and making a profit.  It wants to attract philanthropists to donate the money for Sentinel in the same way that philanthropists historically have funded ground-based telescopes such as the Keck Observatory and the Allen Telescope Array.

DSI provided few details today about how its efforts are being funded, but its near-term plan is to launch three cubesats, called FireFlies, in 2015 to travel to an asteroid and send back images and other data.  Those are one-way missions that should take about 6 months.  The next year, DSI would launch the first DragonFly on a 3-4 year mission to return a sample to Earth.   They were not specific about how the probes would be launched other than saying they plan to “ride-share” on launches conducted for others.   Tumlinson said a DSI customer could buy a trio of the 25 kilogram FireFlies – three to ensure mission success – for $20 million, but he and Gump declined to reveal how much they cost.  Tumlinson said only that the price included a “good profit.”

Eventually, DSI plans to be in the business of harvesting resources from asteroids and running them through the MicroGravity Foundry 3D printer that would create tools and parts from the nickel.  DSI also plans to extract water and other resources that could be made into propellant to refuel on-orbit communications satellites, for example.  The company’s plans get more elaborate after that.

For the near-term, it is hoping to sell data and samples to the government and to obtain development contracts from the government.  Tumlinson said this is a “huge opportunity for us to create a new partnership with government,” adding that they have met with top officials at NASA and the White House already.  While speaking eagerly about individuals so wealthy that they could afford to buy a trio of FireFlies with just the interest that accrued on their accounts during the timespan of the press conference, Tumlinson allowed only that “we hope to hear from them.”

These non-governmental efforts are all on top of government-funded projects to catalog and study asteroids for scientific reasons.  NASA has sent several missions to asteroids, the most recent of which, Dawn, just completed an encounter with the asteroid Vesta and is now enroute to the dwarf planet Ceres.  A NASA asteroid sample-return mission, OSIRIS-Rex, is scheduled for launch in 2016.   The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) was first to return a sample of an asteroid with its Hayabusa spacecraft in 2010.  JAXA plans to launch Hayabusa2 in 2014 to return a sample from a different type of asteroid.

The European Space Agency (ESA) is working on a proposed Asteroid Impact Mission (AIM) that it briefed to NASA’s Small Bodies Assessment Group last week.  ESA is investigating potential collaboration with the Applied Physics Lab at Johns Hopkins University to turn it into an Asteroid Impact Deflection Assessment (AIDA) mission.

President Obama’s decision to send astronauts to an asteroid in 2025 in preparation for human trips to orbit Mars in the 2030s remains controversial.  The President decided there is no need to return astronauts to the Moon, but a test mission to an intermediate distance is still required before sending them on a 2-year journey to Mars.  Only one asteroid has been identified so far as being in a useful location in 2025, however, and other doubts have arisen about the feasibility of such a mission absent at least one robotic precursor to characterize the target before humans arrive.  That would add time and cost, and a recent National Research Council report also found that the asteroid-first concept is not winning support within or outside NASA.

Events of Interest: Week of January 21-25, 2013 — UPDATE

Events of Interest: Week of January 21-25, 2013 — UPDATE

UPDATE:   Adds Deep Space Industries announcement on Tuesday (will be webcast).

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead.   The House and Senate are in session for at least part of the week.

During the Week

The inauguration ceremonies for President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden are the highlight of the week.  Both have been officially sworn in already today, Sunday, January 20, as required, but the ceremonial event will take place tomorrow.   Official events at the Capitol begin at 11:30 am ET, followed by the parade — with two NASA floats, one for Orion and one for Curiosity — which has an expected start time of 2:35 pm ET, but one never knows when it actually will start!

Almost anything else seems tame by comparison, but the first meeting of the new House Science and National Labs Caucus on Wednesday is more directly related to space policy.   Hayden Planetarium Director Neil deGrasse Tyson is the speaker.   The Caucus clearly has a broader focus than NASA — most national labs are operated by the Department of Energy and Department of Defense — but it is interesting that they picked Tyson as the first speaker.   We don’t know what he will discuss, but he is the one who instigated the “penny4NASA” movement last year, calling for a doubling of NASA’s budget to lift the spirits of the nation and reclaim its “birthright to dream of tomorrow.”  The meeting is Wednesday at noon in the Coolidge Auditorium of the Library of Congress. 

Monday, January 21

  • Inaugural ceremonies: Events at the Capitol begin at 11:30 am ET; parade scheduled to begin at 2:35 pm ET (but subject to change)

Tuesday, January 22

Wednesday,  January 23

Thursday, January 24

Friday, January 25

 

Congress Probably Has Fewer Lawyers Than You Think

Congress Probably Has Fewer Lawyers Than You Think

Think what you will of Congress — and it certainly is polling at record lows these days — but whether you love it or hate it there is a widespread perception that most of the 435 Representatives and 100 Senators are lawyers.  Is it true?

Business Week published this graphic showing the backgrounds of the current members of the House and Senate.   Lawyers are not in the majority, though it is pretty close in the Senate (45 out of 100).  The House has 128 lawyers.

Science and engineering certainly are not well represented, though.  The Senate has three medical professionals. The House has 29 medical professionals (including 2 veterinarians), one microbiologist, one physicist, and two engineers.

Intelligence Authorization and Space Exploration Sustainability Act Become Law

Intelligence Authorization and Space Exploration Sustainability Act Become Law

President Obama signed into law yesterday the FY2013 Intelligence Authorization Act (S. 3454) and the Space Exploration Sustainability Act (H.R. 6586).

Those are the last two space-related bills that we were tracking in the 112th Congress and our fact sheet has been updated accordingly.  Once the Public Law numbers are assigned, we will do a final update.  A new fact sheet for the 113th Congress will be created when there is relevant legislation to track.

Congress did not pass any of the regular FY2013 appropriations bills, instead passing a 6-month Continuing Resolution that funds the government through March 27, 2013.   As for other space-related legislation that was being considered in the final days of the 112th Congress that we reported on January 3, here is how it all turned out:

  • American Taxpayer Relief Act (H.R. 8).  Public Law (P.L.) 112-240.  Among other things, delays automatic across-the-board spending cuts — the sequester — until March 1, 2013.
  • FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4310).  P.L. 112-239.  Among other things, eases export controls on satellites.
  • FY2013 Intelligence Authorization Act (S. 3454).  Signed by the President January 14, 2013; P.L. number not yet assigned.  The unclassified text does not directly address satellite programs conducted by the intelligence community, but the classified annex may.
  • Space Exploration Sustainability Act (H.R. 6586). Signed by the President January 14, 2013; P.L. number not yet assigned.  Extends launch liability indemnification for one year, gives NASA relief from some provisions of the Iran, North Korea, Syria Nonproliferation Act (INKSNA), expresses the sense of Congress that NASA not take money from SLS/Orion to pay for commercial crew and vice versa.
  • Renaming Dryden Flight Research Center after Neil Armstrong (H.R. 6612). Passed House, but not Senate, so died at the end of the Congress.
  • Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for relief of Hurricane Sandy victims (H.R. 1). Passed Senate, but not House, so died at the end of the Congress.  The House passed a different bill providing $9.6 billion to the National Flood Insurance Program.   The House is considering this week additional funds for the victims of Sandy.  Whatever passes will have to be considered anew in the Senate.
  • Condemning North Korea’s Missile Launch (H. Con. Res. 145).  Passed House, but not Senate, so died at the end of the Congress.
White House Says No to Death Star

White House Says No to Death Star

Paul Shawcross, Branch Chief for Science and Space at the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), accepted the challenge to respond to the “We the People” petition to build a Death Star.

The Obama White House initiated the We the People petition opportunities to make the White House more accessible to the people.  Anyone 13 or older can petition the White House for action on a range of topics and if 25,000 signatures are obtained within 30 days, the White House promises a response.

Most of the topics are serious, but someone proposed that the United States begin construction of a Death Star by 2016, a reference to the fictional super-weapon in the Star Wars movies.

Shawcross, often criticized for any White House budget decision that doesn’t go NASA’s way, authored the response and shows that OMB does, in fact, have a sense of humor.  The semi-serious riposte, entitled “This Isn’t the Petition Response You’re Looking For,” says that a Death Star isn’t in the cards not only because of its phenomenal cost — Shawcross links to a Lehigh University estimate that it would cost $852,000,000,000,000,000 — but because the administration does not support blowing up planets or building super-weapons that are so easily vulnerable to destruction.

More seriously, he points to the reality that we have an International Space Station, two robots — one laser-wielding — on Mars, two spacecraft on their way out of the solar system (Voyager 1 and 2), and a myriad of other nifty space activities ongoing.

Shawcross ends by encouraging readers to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields and then “the Force will be with us!”