Category: Commercial

Intelligence Auth, Bill Renaming Dryden for Armstrong, Pass House — UPDATE

Intelligence Auth, Bill Renaming Dryden for Armstrong, Pass House — UPDATE

UPDATE, January 1, 2013:   The House passed the FY2013 Intelligence Authorization bill on December 31, clearing it for the President.   It also passed the bill renaming Dryden FRC after Neil Armstrong; the Senate still must act on it.  It did not vote on the North Korea bill or the emergency supplemental.

ORIGINAL STORY, December 30, 2012:  As everyone awaits action on the fiscal cliff, the House has scheduled votes tomorrow on the FY2013 intelligence authorization act and a bill to rename NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center after Neil Armstrong.

The Senate passed the intelligence authorization act, S. 3454, on Friday after consulting with House colleagues to craft it to ensure it would pass both chambers.

The bill, H.R. 6612,  to rename Dryden after the late Neil Armstrong, who was a test pilot there before entering the history books as the first man to walk on the Moon, was scheduled for House consideration two weeks ago, but it never came up for a vote.

The House also has scheduled a vote on a House concurrent resolution, H. Con. Res. 145, condemning North Korea for what the resolution calls a missile launch on December 12.   That launch placed a satellite into orbit, the first successful space launch for that country although reports from western observers indicated the satellite was tumbling and therefore not operational.   Still, it was the first time in four attempts that North Korea succeeded in getting anything into orbit.  Nevertheless, it is widely viewed more as a test of a capability to deliver a nuclear warhead to Earth-based targets than the “peaceful” launch of an earth observing satellite as North Korea claims. 

No vote on H.R. 1, the emergency supplemental appropriations bill for victims of Hurricane Sandy, is scheduled.  That bill includes $15 million for NASA and almost $500 million for NOAA.

 

Still No Deal on Fiscal Cliff, But Talks Continue After Tense Day

Still No Deal on Fiscal Cliff, But Talks Continue After Tense Day

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) told the Senate just before 6:00 pm ET that talks with Republicans would continue on how to avert the fiscal cliff. The statement came after a tense day where earlier he had said the talks were at an impasse because Republicans wanted to add a provision that would change how Social Security cost of living increases are calculated.

As the afternoon began, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) criticized Reid for taking so long to respond to a proposal Republicans made the previous evening. McConnell told the Senate that he had sent a proposal to Reid about 7:00 pm ET Saturday evening, but had received no response by 2:00 pm this afternoon.  Reid then took the floor and replied that he had no counteroffer to make.  While complimenting McConnell for negotiating in good faith, Reid said the two were simply too far apart on “some pretty big issues.”

The focus of the talks has been on tax rates and other tax breaks that will expire at midnight tomorrow.  Aides to Reid were quoted as saying that now is not the time to bring Social Security benefits into the debate.

The Senate recessed to allow each party to caucus and determine how to proceed. Republicans emerged insisting that they did not know that the proposed change — using the chained price index to calculate cost of living increases, which would reduce those increases — was a dealbreaker and they would take the issue off the table.  About two hours later, Reid returned to the floor and said he was happy to hear it, and talks would continue.  He said there is still time for a deal, but his manner did not convey optimism.

As for the automatic spending cuts that will take place on January 2 — the sequester — several media sources that closely follow Capitol Hill politics are reporting that there is virtually no chance that Congress will act to stop it.  How long it would take for the draconian cuts — 9.4 percent for defense, 8.2 percent for the rest of discretionary spending — to impact government and contractor personnel and programs is a matter of debate.  Since it begins with cuts to spending in FY2013, which is already underway, people are getting increasingly nervous.

Nothing is certain until the deadlines pass, of course, and even then the 113th Congress — which begins on Thursday — can fix problems left by the 112th.  Aphorisms like “it’s always darkest before the dawn” or “it ain’t over till the fat lady sings” may be cliches, but they also often are true.  If the stock market continues its decline tomorrow, the parties may be motivated to find a solution.

 

No Fiscal Cliff Deal Yet, Failure to Fix Sequestration "Dereliction of Duty" Says Blakey

No Fiscal Cliff Deal Yet, Failure to Fix Sequestration "Dereliction of Duty" Says Blakey

With half of the 48 hours gone already, Senate Democratic and Republican leaders still have not reached a deal to avert the fiscal cliff.   Meanwhile, Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) President Marion Blakey issued a stern warning today about the impact on the aerospace sector if sequestration goes into effect.

After a meeting at the White House yesterday,  Senator Democratic Leader Harry Reid (NV) and Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (KY) agreed to spend the weekend trying to reach an agreement that would pass the Senate and, hopefully, the House before the clock strikes midnight on Monday, December 31.  A deal is expected to be presented to their respective caucuses tomorrow afternoon.  

The Senate was in session Thursday and Friday, but not today.  The House has been in recess since before Christmas.  Both chambers are scheduled to meet tomorrow in a rare Sunday session.  House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) alerted Members that the House could remain in session through January 2.   That is the last possible day for the 112th Congress.  The 113th Congress, with new and returning members elected on November 6, begins on Thursday.  All pending legislation dies at the end of a Congress.   Democratic Senators reportedly are drafting legislation to be introduced as soon as the 113th Congress convenes to cut tax rates if no agreement is reached before then.

Few details have been made public about what progress is being made other than that tax rates remain at the heart of the disagreement.   Republicans have insisted all along that tax rates should remain the same for all income levels while President Obama wants tax rates for the wealthiest individuals to return to levels prior to the George W. Bush Administration.  President Obama is calling for rates for those who earn over $250,000 to go up, but recently indicated he would compromise at $400,000.   House Speaker Boehner attempted to win support from his Republican caucus for the higher rates to apply only to those with incomes $1 million or more, but that was rejected.

The tax increases — not only from the expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts, but a number of other expiring provisions such as adjustments to the Alternative Minimum Tax, estate tax reductions, tax credits for college tuition, and the payroll tax holiday — are only one part of the fiscal cliff scenario.   Extended unemployment benefits will expire and Medicare reimbursements to doctors will be cut if Congress does not act. 

Another leg of the stool is sequestration — deep cuts to defense and non-defense discretionary spending.  AIA has been leading the charge all year on highlighting the dire impacts to the defense aerospace sector as well as NASA and NOAA if the spending cuts take place.  Under the Budget Control Act (BCA) of 2011, defense spending would be cut 9.4 percent and NASA and NOAA (and other government non-defense discretionary spending) would be cut 8.2 percent. 

Blakey starkly warned today that if Congress does not fix the sequestration problem it will be a “grave dereliction of duty.”  Agreeing that budget cuts are needed to deal with the deficit, she insisted that sequestration is “the wrong way to do it” and a “mindless meataxe approach that will cause immense disruption and harm our economy and national security.”

Republicans agreed to the defense cuts when the BCA was passed in August 2011, but changed their minds this year and now are seeking to exempt defense from the cuts and reduce government spending elsewhere in exchange, such as by entitlement reform or changes to the tax code (but not tax rates).  Democrats want at least some cuts to defense, for which spending mushroomed during the past decade with the Iraq and Afghan wars.

President Obama said in his weekly address today that if all else fails, he wants the Senate to vote on a modest package that would keep tax rates at their current levels for people with incomes under $250,000, extend unemployment insurance, and set the stage for future progress on the other issues.  He said he believes such a package could pass both the House and Senate if it is allowed to come to a vote.  “That’s the way this is supposed to work,” he said, adding that “We just can’t afford a politically self-inflicted wound to our economy.”

In the Republican response, Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO) criticized Democrats on a broad range of issues ending with his own warning against going over the fiscal cliff.  He gave no hint of what compromise might be in the works, reiterating Republican assertions that it is up to the President to lead.

In essence, today seems like politics as usual.  For those who want to avoid falling off the fiscal cliff, one can only hope that the behind-the-scenes deliberations are more productive.

Progress Reported on Fiscal Cliff Deal After White House Meeting

Progress Reported on Fiscal Cliff Deal After White House Meeting

The top Democrat and the top Republican in the Senate reportedly are jointly working on a plan to avoid the fiscal cliff after a meeting at the White House this afterrnoon of top congressional leaders and the President.

Details are sketchy, but multiple news sources are reporting that Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) and Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) agreed to spend the weekend trying to come up with a deal that will pass muster with both parties on both sides of Capitol Hill.  The Senate returned to work yesterday; the House will meet for legislative business on Sunday.

The news came after a one-hour meeting among top House and Senate Democratic and Republican leaders and President Obama, Vice President Biden, and top advisors.   The President said at a press conference after the meeting that if Reid and McConnell are unable to reach a bipartisan agreement, he will press for a Democratic proposal to be put forward instead for an up and down vote that would protect the middle class from tax increases, extend unemployment benefits, and lay the “groundwork for future cooperation on more economic growth and deficit reduction.”  He said he believed such a measure would pass both chambers if the leaders would allow it to come to a vote.  He called the meeting today “constructive.”

Russia Plans To Spend $70 Billion On Space as ILS Stresses Independent Review of Proton Anomaly

Russia Plans To Spend $70 Billion On Space as ILS Stresses Independent Review of Proton Anomaly

Despite a very recent malfunction that added to Russia’s growing list of launch vehicle anomalies, high level Russian government officials are touting the future of the country’s space program and a return to the capabilities under the Soviet-era.

Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev told Russia’s news agency RIA Novosti that Russia will spend 2.1 trillion rubles, about $70 billion, for development of its space industry over the 2013-2020 time period. The total will enable Russia to “effectively participate in forward-looking projects, such as the ISS, the study of the Moon, Mars, and other celestial bodies in the solar system,” he said.

Separately, Russian space agency director Vladimir Popovkin told Russia’s Itar-Tass news agency that “By 2015 we shall restore the capabilities we had back in the Soviet era, and in 2015-2020 we are to create conditions for a breakthrough on the basis of new technologies.”

These bold statements were not accompanied by many details. For example, it is not clear exactly what is included in the 2.1 trillion ruble ($70 billion) figure. That funding spans eight years, so is on average $8.75 billion per year. Medvedev said it includes “extrabudgetary” sources implying it is more than what the Russian government budget will fund. Presumably it includes payments the United States makes to Russia for crew transportation and other services related to the International Space Station (ISS) — about $450 million per year according to NASA.

It might also include money the Russian space industry earns through commercial launches. According to The Space Report 2012, published by the Space Foundation, in 2011 Russia conducted 10 commercial launches, or 56 percent of the global commercial space launch market. How much it earned from those launches is not public, and whether it will retain that percentage of the market — and thereby contribute to the overall total of how much Russia invests in its space program — may depend on restoring confidence in Russia’s launch vehicle fleet.

Russia has endured an unusual two years of launch vehicle failures that may give prospective customers second thoughts. The most recent anomaly, of a Proton rocket’s Briz upper stage, placed Russia’s Yamal 402 communications satellite into the wrong orbit. Although ground controllers were able to use the satellite’s own propulsion system to eventually boost the satellite into the correct position, the fuel usage will reduce the satellite’s operational lifetime from 15 years to 11 years.

The incident underscored continuing concerns about the health of the Russian space industry. The launch was conducted by International Launch Services (ILS).  It issued a statement today that various root causes of the failure are still being evaluated. RIA Novosti reported yesterday that Roscosmos has concluded a bad bearing in a turbopump was the problem, but the ILS statement stresses that it formed its own independent failure review oversight board to look at the Russian government’s findings.  It will not issue its own final report until its independent review is completed. 

The Russian government has been conducting an intensive review of the space sector, led by Medvedev and Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin. The statements to the Russian press today signal that the government plans to shore up its support of the space program, building on a substantial increase in government space spending last year. The Space Report 2012 states that the Russian government’s calendar year 2011 planned spending was $4.12 billion, a 21.2 percent increase over the previous year. By comparison, it calculated total U.S. government space spending (military and civil) in 2011 at $47.25 billion, a 0.4 percent decrease.

Precisely where Russia’s $70 billion announced today will go over the next eight years is unclear. RIA Novosti quotes Dmitry Paison, director of development for the Skolkovo space cluster, as saying the money is for “the Federal Space Program, the Federal Special Program for the Development of the Glonass system, the program for the development of space launch centers and the non-classified part of the program for the technical modernization of the industry.” Paison’s omission of classified programs is understandable, but leaves open the question of what other space spending the Russian government plans that is not public.

Glonass is Russia’s navigation satellite system, analogous to the U.S. GPS system, and a high priority of the Putin government. The head of the company that builds and manages the program recently left his job — some say he was fired, others say he left due to illness — after an investigation found the company embezzled $200 million of government funding.

Popovkin also said today that the current Russian share of the “world market of space services” will rise from 10 percent today to 16 percent, though he did not say over what time period. By comparison, he said the United States has 60 percent of that market “including production and the services provided” and that the United States controls “about 70 percent of the television and radio market.”   The source of his data was not mentioned.   As already noted, in 2011 Russia had 56 percent of the commercial launch services market, while the United States conducted no commercial launches. The Space Report 2012 further states that the United States had 38 percent of the world market for commercial satellite manufacturing, down from 51 percent the prior year (no figure was provided for Russia). Country-by-country breakdowns of other market segments, such as commercial space products and services, including satellite communications and broadcasting, also are not provided in that report.

The bottom line is that although many details are missing, the statements by Medvedev and Popovkin convey that the Russian government plans to step up its investment in space activities.

Indeed, during the past year Russia has announced plans for additional space-based telescopes and robotic lunar probes, joined in Europe’s ExoMars program, announced progress in developing a replacement for the venerable Soyuz spaceship that takes crews to the ISS, and expressed continued interest in building a new launch site at Vostochny in the far eastern region of the country. Some of these plans have been in the works for many years, making claims of progress only mildly credible, but at a time of duress in the Russian space program, the vote of confidence from top government leaders undoubtedly comes as welcome news to the Russian space industry and, presumably, its customers.

SpaceX Grasshopper Test Reminiscent of DC-X, New Shepard

SpaceX Grasshopper Test Reminiscent of DC-X, New Shepard

SpaceX revealed on December 23 that it conducted another successful test of its Grasshopper rocket on December 17.   This time the rocket rose 40 meters (about 120 feet), hovered, and vertically descended to land on the pad where it had just taken off. 

SpaceX posted a video of the 29-second test on YouTube.  Watching it is reminiscent of an earlier program, the DC-X, sponsored initially by DOD’s Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO) and later by NASA.

DC-X stood for Delta Clipper-Experimental and a later version, DC-XA, added “advanced” to the name.   McDonnell Douglas, one of the country’s leading aerospace companies at the time, was the prime contractor on the project and renowned former astronaut Charles “Pete” Conrad was the project’s leader at the company.  It merged with Boeing in 1997.

Like SpaceX’s Grasshopper, the goal was to demonstrate a reusable launch vehicle that took off and landed vertically, although it was shaped differently than Grasshopper.  Subscale prototype DC-X and DC-XA vehicles achieved several successful tests between 1993-1996, ascending vertically, moving laterally, and then descending vertically.  NASA took over the program in 1996 after BMDO determined it could no longer afford it.  During its next to last test in 1996, it reached a record altitude of 3,140 meters (about 10,000 feet).    It flew its last flight in July 1996 when it was heavily damaged upon landing because one of the landing struts failed to deploy.  It tipped over and was engulfed in flames.

Elon Musk’s SpaceX is not the only company interested in the DC-X dream of vertical take-off and landing (VTOL).  Blue Origin, owned by another Internet billionaire, Jeff Bezos, is designing the New Shepard system.  NASA describes New Shepard as being “inspired” by the DC-X.  Media stories report that some of the engineers who worked on DC-X now work for Blue Origin.   A video of a successful November 17, 2011 test flight is posted on its website.

Blue Origin is relatively secret about its activities so little is known apart from its website and information provided to NASA as part of awards it received under the Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) program for developing a “pusher” launch abort system.  Its CCDev role is completed and Blue Origin did not compete for the follow-on Commercial Crew Integrated Capability (CCiCAP) awards.  It is focused on lowering the cost of spaceflight so more people can travel on suborbital and orbital flights.

Events of Interest: Weeks of December 24, 2012 – January 4, 2013

Events of Interest: Weeks of December 24, 2012 – January 4, 2013

Ordinarily we’d be explaining that there are no interesting events for a couple of weeks while everyone celebrates the holidays, but this is not an ordinary year.  Here’s what we know — and don’t know — as 2012 ends and 2013 begins.

During the Weeks

It is totally unclear as to what will happen in Washington in the next two weeks with one exception — the 112th Congress will end and the 113th Congress will begin.  (Congresses last for two years.)  Whether the members of the 112th Congress can reach agreement to avoid the fiscal cliff that otherwise will occur in this time period or leave the mess to be cleaned up by the 113th Congress is anyone’s guess. 

The House recessed on Thursday with no fixed date to return for legislative business (it is scheduled to meet only in pro forma session).  House Speaker John Boehner reportedly told his House Republican Conference they were going home until after Christmas and perhaps for the rest of the year after he was unable to round up enough votes in his own party to pass his “Plan B” alternative to President Obama’s latest fiscal cliff avoidance offer.   Boehner’s Plan B included raising taxes on the wealthiest people (over $1 million) and conservative Republicans refused to agree.  They have consistently opposed any new taxes.  

The President responded by saying that he still thinks at least some sort of deal can be reached before the end of the year if everyone is willing to compromise.  He then headed off for his annual Christmas vacation in Hawaii, where he grew up, ready to return to Washington on Wednesday if progress is being made.  The Senate also is in recess with only pro forma sessions scheduled.  It is in the middle of debating a supplemental appropriations bill for the victims of Hurricane Sandy.

Some Washington pundits are trying to ratchet down the “fiscal cliff” rhetoric by calling it a “fiscal slope” to telegraph that the impacts may be more gradual than the word “cliff” implies.  In fact, from a political standpoint, there may be an advantage in letting the tax breaks expire on December 31.   The politicians could quickly pass new legislation in January to return the tax rates to the pre-December 31 level for everyone except the wealthiest people (whether that’s over $250,000 as the President had been insisting, over $400,000 as he recently compromised, or $1 million as Speaker Boenher proposed).   That would count as a tax cut rather than a tax increase and thereby not violate anyone’s pledge to never vote for a tax increase.  As for sequestration, it might be relatively easy to simply delay when it would go into effect, giving everyone time to come up with a better solution, even though they have not been able to find one in the past 17 months.

Two smaller space policy-related items on the “to do” list before the end of the year:

  • Congress needs to pass and the President to sign legislation to extend authority for the FAA to indemnify launch service companies from third party claims for certain amounts of money (existing authority expires December 31); and
  • The President needs to sign the FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which the House and Senate passed late last week, including a number of important space-related provisions such as easing export controls on satellites.

The House had scheduled a vote last week on H.R. 6612 (McCarthy) to rename NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center after Neil Armstrong, but it was never brought up.   There was no public word about progress on S. 3661 (Nelson-Hutchison), which would extend the indemnification provision, provide NASA with another waiver to the Iran-North Korea-Syria Nonproliferation Act (INKSNA) so it can purchase services from Russia for the International Space Station, and give NASA a mandate to explore cis-lunar space.  The House passed a bill in November to extend the indemnification provision only (H.R. 6586, Palazzo) that is awaiting Senate action. 

So all of those bills are still in play until the 112th Congress adjourns “sine die”  — “without a day” to reconvene, meaning the 112th Congress is over.  All pending legislation dies at the end of a Congress.   The 113th Congress will convene on January 3 with the new and returning members who were elected on November 6 and the cycle starts over again for the next two years.

Otherwise, we have only one specific space policy-related event on the calendar for the next two weeks:

Friday, January 4, 2013

House Passes Final Version of NDAA, Goes Home for Now — UPDATE

House Passes Final Version of NDAA, Goes Home for Now — UPDATE

UPDATE:  The Senate passed the conference report this afternoon (Dec. 21), clearing the bill for the President.

The House approved the conference version of the FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) last night, then adjourned until after Christmas.   The surprise decision to leave town came after House Speaker John Boehner determined he did not have sufficient votes to pass his fical cliff “Plan B” and said it was now up to the President to negotiate a deal with Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid.

Athough that leaves the fiscal cliff situation in a very uncertain state, the House did at least pass the conference report on the NDAA (H.R. 4310).  It is expected to pass the Senate today.   The bill sets policy and recommends funding levels — only appropriations bills actually provide money and the Department of Defense, like other government agencies, is operating under a Continuing Resolution until March 27, 2013 at FY2012 funding levels.  As published in the December 18, 2012 Congressional Record, the FY2013 NDAA conference agreement includes a number of important space-related provisions, including the following:

  • Eases export controls for satellites by repealing section 1513(a) of Subtitle B of Title XV of the FY1999 Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act, meaning that items that were on the dual-use Commerce Control List at the time that law was passed and thereafter transferred to the State Department’s Munitions List and its International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) may now be transferred back to the Commerce Control List subject to certain determinations (sec. 1261-1267); this language replaces what the House passed in its version of the FY2013 NDAA in May.
  • Establishes requirements on the President and others in the Executive Branch to make certain certifications and provide briefings to Congress if the United States becomes a signatory to an International Code of Conduct (sec. 913(a) and (b)).
  • Requires an annual report on the counter-space programs of other countries (sec. 913 (c)).
  • Requires a report describing key space technologies that could be used, or are being sought, by foreign countries with counter- space or ballistic missile programs that should be subject to export controls (sec. 917).
  • Requires a report on the national security implications of continuing to use foreign components and propulsion systems for Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicles (EELVs) (Sec. 916).
  • Restricts the expenditure of 10 percent of the FY2013 funding for EELVs until the Secretary of the Air Force submits a report describing the acquisition strategy for that program and certification that it maintains assured access to space, achieves substantial cost savings, and provides opportunities for competition (sec. 153).
  • Requires a report from the Secretary of Defense in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence on requirements for overhead persistent infrared technology (sec. 915).
  • Requires a report by April 1, 2013 on DOD’s peacetime and wartime requirements for electro-optical satellite imagery (sec. 924); this replaces the Senate provision that $125 million be added to ensure that both commercial satellite imagery companies (GeoEye and DigitalGlobe) are supported by government imagery purchases under the EnhanvedView contract.  The conference agreement notes that the two companies have announced plans to merge and adds that if the merger is not approved by the Department of Justice, Congress will reassess the situation (Congressional Record, p. H7146).
  • Requires that before any major satellite acquisition program begins, schedules that integrate satellites and their ground systems must be developed (sec. 911).
  • Requires a report and a joint exercise plan on the readiness of the joint force to operate in environments where there is no access to Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems including satellites (sec. 342).
  • Restores $10 million in funding and adds another $35 million — a total of $45 million — for the Air Force Operationally Responsive Space (ORS) program, which the Obama Administration wanted to terminate, and specifies in detail its organizational and budgetary placement within the Air Force. (The Senate Armed Services Committee’s press release says that the final language included the committee’s recommendation that up to $60 million in FY2012 funding be transferred from the Weather Satellite Follow-on program to ORS to build a low cost high technology readiness level weather satellite, but the conference report states that the House removed that provision, Congressional Record, p. H. 7145) (sec 914).
  • Adds $35 million to the $10 million requested — a total of $45 million — for the Space Test Program.
  • Authorizes private entities to contribute to the upkeep of DOD launch ranges and facilities (sec. 912).
  • Authorizes DOD to procure block buys of Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS) satellites 5 and 6 over six years, including advance procurement of $3.9 billion (sec. 152).
  • Requires DOD to conduct an independent cost estimate and analysis of alternatives (AoA) for the Missile Defense Agency’s Precision Tracking Space Sensor, cuts the $297 million request by $55 million, and limits the availability of 75 percent of that funding until the AoA is submitted to Congress (sec. 224).

 

 

Bolden: Don't Have to Travel Far to Asteroid to Meet President's Goal

Bolden: Don't Have to Travel Far to Asteroid to Meet President's Goal

NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden told a National Research Council (NRC) committee today that meeting President Obama’s goal of sending astronauts to an asteroid by 2025 does not necessarily mean they have to travel a great distance.  Although he did not raise the topic of capturing an asteroid and bringing it to the Earth-Moon vicinity as recently proposed by former astronaut Tom Jones, Bolden’s interpretation of the President’s directive could allow for that possibility.

President Obama announced that an asteroid would be the next destination for the U.S. human spaceflight program beyond low Earth orbit (LEO) on April 15, 2010 as an intermediate destination on the way to sending astronauts to orbit Mars in the 2030s.  The mission would allow NASA to study the effects of a long duration mission in space on astronauts for a duration greater than what astronauts experienced in the Apollo lunar program, but less than the time required to journey to Mars.   A human journey to Mars is expected to take about 6 months each way.  The Apollo lunar missions lasted less than 2 weeks. 

Bolden’s comments were made to an NRC committee that is charged with making recommendations on the future of the U.S. human spaceflight program.  The Committee on Human Spaceflight, co-chaired by former Secretary of Defense Bill Perry and Cornell space scientist Jonathan Lunine, held its first meeting today.  Bolden read a statement to the committee (the text is not yet posted on the NASA website) and then answered questions posed by committee members.

Last week, former astronaut Tom Jones spoke to the Space Policy and History Forum outlining a proposal for a public-private partnership to send a robotic spacecraft to an asteroid, capture it, and move it to cis-lunar space (the Earth-Moon system).  He is a consultant to NASA and an advisor to Planetary Resources, Inc., an organization that wants to mine asteroids, but said he was speaking only for himself.  Jones outlined how astronauts could then visit the asteroid, study it, and possibly extract resources from it.  His theme was that there is no need to send astronauts out to the asteroid when the asteroid could be brought to the astronauts.   Indeed, he said it would be the only way that astronauts could visit an asteroid by 2025 as the President directed.

The obvious question is what purpose would be served by astronauts visiting an asteroid that was relocated to cis-lunar space since Obama’s directive has been understood to mean sending astronauts on a multi-month expedition into deep space to test systems and assess human reactions to the space environment in preparation for a longer trip to Mars.

Bolden’s comment today came in response to a question about the rationale for a human trip to an asteroid.  It was not linked to Jones’s proposal, but supports the possibility that it could satisfy the President’s directive.   Bolden said that when the President announced that an asteroid would be the next destination for NASA’s human spaceflight program, he did not say NASA had to fly all the way to an asteroid.  What matters is the “ability to put humans with an asteroid,” Bolden said.

An NRC report released earlier this month concluded that sending people to an asteroid has not won wide support in NASA or the nation.  Bolden did not criticize that report directly, but said that NRC committee had only a short time to complete its study and it was done at a time of “relative silence” from NASA because of the election and did not have the benefit of the information he was presenting this morning.  The only new material he presented this morning was this information about the asteroid mission and the news that NASA will soon stand up a Space Technology Mission Directorate.

NASA’s plans for cis-lunar space became a topic of interest in September when the Orlando Sentinel published an article that NASA was considering building a small “gateway” space station at the L2 Lagrange point in the Earth-Moon system.  Bolden emphasized today that he was not suggesting that NASA was planning any human mission to a Lagrange point.  He stressed that the agency is on a “flexible path” and might have to alter its plans based on what it finds along the way.   The concept of a flexible path was first outlined in the 2009 Augustine Committee report.

The Orlando Sentinel article and the asteroid relocation mission proposed by Jones could be trial balloons or simply unrelated events.  The juxtaposition of those with Bolden’s comments today, however, underscores the fact that confusion remains about what exactly NASA is planning in the relative near term about the future of human spaceflight beyond LEO.  The NRC Committee on Human Spaceflight is tasked with making recommendations on that very topic.  Its report is expected in 2014. 

Editor’s Note:  In the interest of full disclosure, I was a member of the committee that produced the NRC report released earlier this month.

Senator Daniel Inouye Dies

Senator Daniel Inouye Dies

Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI), chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, died today at the age of 88.  Although he had been ill, his death came as a surprise to Senate colleagues.

Inouye, 88, was the most senior Democrat and therefore served as president pro tempore (or pro-temp) of the Senate, third in line for the presidency (after the Vice President and the Speaker of the House).  He served nine terms in the Senate.  Democrats and Republicans alike praised him as a person and a Senator.

       

Photo credit:  Senate Appropriations Committee website 

A decorated World War II veteran who lost his right arm fighting in Italy, he became a Congressman on August 21, 1959, the day that Hawaii became a State.  Three years later he was elected to the Senate and was reelected eight times thereafter.

In 2009, he replaced Robert Byrd (D-WV) as chairman of the powerful appropriations committee.  He also chaired the defense appropriations subcommittee.  

Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) is next in line in seniority on the full committee as well as on the defense subcommittee and therefore likely to replace Inouye on both.  He is currently chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and is particularly associated with Internet issues such as privacy and freedom of speech.   Leahy also was second in seniority to Inouye in the Senate, so will become president pro tempore.

What impact the appropriations committee leadership change might have on space programs is unclear.   Subcommittee chairs hold considerable power of their own.  Senator Barbara Mikulski has been and is expected to continue to be an influential force on NASA and NOAA programs as chair of the Commerce-Justice-Science subcommittee.   Leahy likely will be the new chair of the defense subcommittee as well as the full committee.  His views on space programs are not well known.

Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie (D) will appoint someone to replace Inouye until a special election is held in 2014 for someone to serve the remainder of Inouye’s term, which runs until 2016.