Category: Commercial

Space Policy Events for the Week of March 4-8, 2013

Space Policy Events for the Week of March 4-8, 2013

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead.  The House and Senate will be in session.

During the Week

Government agencies, including NASA, NOAA and DOD, will start implementing the sequester this week.  Washington politicians failed to reach agreement on an alternative to reducing the deficit, so the blunt force “meat-axe” across-the-board spending cuts that were never supposed to happen did happen nonetheless.   For FY2013, the fiscal year that is already underway, NASA and NOAA were cut 5 percent and DOD 7.8 percent, although the effective rates are 9 percent and 13 percent since the cuts must be absorbed in just seven months instead of 12.  

According to a March 1, 2013 Office of Management and Budget report to Congress, NASA will lose $896 million in FY2013 funding compared to its total budget of about $17.8 billion.  We updated our fact sheet on NASA’s FY2013 budget, including adding a table showing how much each of NASA’s budget accounts will be cut.  NOAA will lose $266 million from the two budget accounts that fund its satellite programs.   DOD does not have a “space” budget so understanding the effect on national security space programs is extremely difficult.  Perhaps the Marshall Institute/TechAmerica panel discussion on Thursday will shed some light on that.

Whether the White House and Congress continue discussions on alternates to the sequester this week remains to be seen.   The next critical fiscal deadline is March 27 when the Continuing Resolution that is currently funding the government expires.  It may be that the politicians combine negotiations on the sequester and what to do about funding the rest of FY2013.  Time will tell.

Meanwhile, the House Science, Space and Technology Committee will turn its attention to the threats posed by asteroids (or meteors, once they enter the atmosphere) and comets at a hearing on Wednesday.  That and other events of interest are listed below.

Tuesday, March 5

Wednesday, March 6

Wednesday-Friday, March 6-8

  • National Research Council (NRC) Space Science Week, National Academy of Sciences building, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington DC (NOTE THAT THE MEETINGS ARE NOT AT THE KECK CENTER ON 5TH STREET WHERE SUCH MEETINGS OFTEN TAKE PLACE)

    The NRC’s four space science discipline committees will meet jointly and separately over the course of the three days

    • Committee on Astronomy and Astrophysics
    • Committee on Astrobiology and Planetary Science
    • Committee on Earth Science and Applications from Space
    • Committee on Solar and Space Physics

Thursday, March 7

Friday, March 8

Dragon to Rendezvous with ISS Sunday Morning-UPDATE

Dragon to Rendezvous with ISS Sunday Morning-UPDATE

UPDATE:  March 2, 10:10 pm ET:   NASA says via its ISS website that the grapple time now is 6:31 am ET Sunday morning, 30 minutes later than earlier announced.

The problems with the thrusters on SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft have been resolved and it is now scheduled to rendezvous with the International Space Station (ISS) tomorrow morning (Sunday) Eastern Standard Time (EST).

The rendezvous was postponed from today while the company and NASA ascertained Dragon’s health.  After launch yesterday, three of the four thruster pods failed to initiate.  During a telecon later in the day, officials said they were not certain what happened, but theorized it was a clogged oxidizer line or malfunctioning valve.   Actions taken by SpaceX resolved whatever the problem was.

Dragon now is scheduled to rendezvous with ISS early tomorrow and be captured (“grappled”) using ISS’s robotic arm, Canadarm2, at 6:01 am EST.   SpaceX will livestream the activity at http://spacex.com/webcast.  Dragon later will be installed (“berthed”) to a docking port on the ISS’s Harmony module where it will remain until March 25.  It then will unberth from the station and return to Earth.

NASA says on its ISS website that NASA TV coverage of the rendezvous and grapple will begin at 3:00 am EST and coverage of the berthing will start at 7:30 am EST.

This is SpaceX’s second “Commercial Resupply Service” or CRS mission to ISS and is designated CRS-2.   The spacecraft is carrying supplies and scientific equipment to the ISS crew.

Bolden, Holdren, Shelton to Testify Next Week on Threats from Space

Bolden, Holdren, Shelton to Testify Next Week on Threats from Space

NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden, Presidential Science Adviser John Holdren and Air Force Space Command Commander Gen. William Shelton will head to Capitol Hill next week to testify about the threat from meteors and comets.

The House Science, Space and Technology Committee has scheduled a hearing on Wednesday, March 6, at 2:00 pm ET, which they call “Part I” of hearings that will review U.S. government efforts to track and mitigate the threat posed by these celestial objects.

Asteroids are rocks in space.   If they enter Earth’s atmosphere, they are called meteors (or fireballs).  Any portions that reach the surface are called meteorites.   A meteor exploded over the Russian city of Chelyabinsk on February 15, injuring more than 1,000 people — mostly from flying glass as windows broke from the shock wave created by the meteor’s interaction with the atmosphere.

Tito Outlines High Risk, Low Cost, Fast Paced Human Mission to Mars

Tito Outlines High Risk, Low Cost, Fast Paced Human Mission to Mars

After more than a week of rumors, Dennis Tito and his Inspiration Mars Foundation team outlined their plans for a human trip to fly-by Mars in 2018 at a press conference in Washington, DC today (February 27).  Few details about the cost or architecture for the mission were revealed, but that appeared to be primarily because they do not know themselves.  With only five years to go before launch, despite the team’s palpable enthusiasm, the lack of detailed planning and funding are major obstacles.

The messages today were that the Inspiration Mars team believes America needs to send humans to Mars to inspire the next generation; they have a viable concept that involves almost no government investment; yes, it is risky, but informed consent will guide the decisions of potential crew members; and the time is now because if they miss the 2018 launch date there won’t be another chance like this until 2031. 

Earth and Mars change in their relative positions to each other as they orbit the Sun. They line up every 26 months, but some of those alignments are better than others in terms of how much energy is needed to send a spacecraft from here to there. The next two best opportunities are 2018 and 2031.

The brashness of the proposal is raising a lot of eyebrows.   Human trips to Mars have been studied for decades and are usually estimated to cost hundreds of billions of dollars and take many years to accomplish.  Current U.S. space policy, for example, is to send people to the vicinity of Mars — not to land — in the 2030s using the Space Launch System (SLS) and Orion spacecraft now in development.  Landing people on Mars would happen at some indefinite time thereafter.  Most of the humans-to-Mars mission concepts whose costs have been estimated so far involve landing on the planet, not flying by, however.  Tito explained that is one of the reasons this mission can be done comparatively inexpensively because it would neither go into orbit nor land. 

Under Tito’s plan, two people in a “simple” spacecraft would launch from Earth on January 5, 2018 and fly to Mars on a free return trajectory.  The journey out and back would take 501 days with no need for changing their path along the way.  Tito compared it to a boomerang.  The spacecraft would come as close as 100 miles to the Mars surface.   Since the mission does not require any propulsive burns, the spacecraft needs minimal propellant.  It will not land or dock and involves no spacewalks, eliminating all those associated systems.  Air and water would be recycled, minimizing life support system requirements.  Once the journey starts, though, there is no turning back.  No way for the crew to change their minds or escape the confines of the spacecraft.

Tito said he did not know how much the mission would cost, but it was “chump change compared to what we’ve heard before” about human Mars missions.  In a sign of how modest the price is, one of the team members at today’s event mentioned that a 6-year-old boy had sent a $10 donation and panel moderator Miles O’Brien joked that if 10 million kids sent $10 each that would be enough. Tito nodded. 

By comparison the robotic Mars Curiosity rover cost $2.5 billion.  It needed a landing system and a robust scientific instrument suite which Tito’s mission will not have, but Tito’s mission requires life support systems.

He has agreed to personally fund the first two years, Tito said, but when asked how much that was in dollars, he shrugged his shoulders and said “who knows.”   Tito is the multimillionaire CEO of Wilshire Associates, a financial investment firm, who paid a reported $20 million to Russia to fly to the International Space Station in 2001.  He is quite knowledgeable about Mars trajectories, however.  Much earlier in his career, he worked at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) calculating spacecraft flyby trajectories to Mars. 

He stressed that this is not a commercial endeavor and he will not be richer at the end of it — “let me guarantee you I will come out a lot poorer … but my grandchildren will come out a lot wealthier due to the inspiration this will give them.”  He plans to obtain the requisite funding from philanthropists and other individual donations, sponsorships, media rights, and selling data to NASA for “as much as we can get away with.”   He has signed a Space Act Agreement with NASA’s Ames Research Center already for assistance on life support and thermal protection systems.  Ames Center Director S. Pete Worden is one of the co-authors of a paper Tito will present at an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Aerospace Conference on Sunday.

Tito and his team emphasized again and again that this is an American mission.  When asked about potential international cooperation, Tito said that some systems may be procured from foreign sources, but the point is to revitalize the American space program and the crew would be an American man and an American woman — preferably a married couple.   When asked directly if he was trying to beat China in sending people to Mars, he replied “Wouldn’t I want to do that?  Wouldn’t I want America to do that?”   He made clear that he believes that other countries will use the 2031 opportunity to send such missions to Mars, adding to his urgency.  

In addition to being American, the two crew members would need to meet a variety of strict requirements including having the skills to repair anything that goes wrong along the way and suitable temperaments to coexist in a spacecraft roughly the size of a Winnebago traveling far from home for over a year-and-a-half.  Two of the Inspiration Mars team members have somewhat related experience having lived in Biosphere 2.  Jane Poynter and Taber MacCallum, now married, lived in that self-sustaining sealed enclosure in the Arizona desert for “2 years and 20 minutes” Poynter said today and learned a lot about human psychology in confined environments.  The two later founded Paragon Space Development Corp. that develops environmental controls for extreme and hazardous environments. 

Among the risks is that of radiation, a potential show stopper for a government funded mission because of the attendant health risks for the crew, but Inspiration Mars does not need to adhere to NASA’s requirements.  Jonathan Clark is the chief medical officer for the mission.  As far as radiation risk, he said that people accept the increased risk of cancer due to smoking, for example, and similarly crew members would be apprised of the potential increased cancer risk so they could decide if they want to accept it.   Informed consent is the mission’s principle.  Clark is more concerned about debilitating radiation effects that could prevent a crew member from performing assigned duties than about increased cancer risk, which can be dealt with after returning to Earth.  Clark is a former NASA space shuttle crew surgeon whose wife, NASA astronaut Laurel Clark, perished in the Columbia accident. He was medical director of the Red Bull Stratos high altitude balloon jump by Felix Baumgartner.

The paper Tito will give at IEEE describes a conceptual mission that involves using SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket and Dragon spacecraft, but the team emphasized today that they had had no formal discussions with Space X, and are talking with a number of companies that have spacecraft or launch vehicles available.

Clark acknowledged that “no question, this is a risky and bold endeavor,” but Tito added that he would not be comfortable launching the mission “with anything other than a .99 probability of the crew returning safely.”

As rumors spread about the announcement today, there was a certain giggle factor at the idea that a human mission to Mars could be mounted in just five years, much less at a cost low enough to be accomplished without government involvement.  Nonetheless, Tito had an array of supporters at his side today, including the Space Foundation, the Challenger Center for Space Science Education, the Conrad Foundation, and Women in Aerospace.   They also announced that Joe Rothenberg, a former director of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center and former NASA Associate Administrator for Space Flight who ran the space shuttle and International Space Station programs for several years, would chair an advisory review board.

MacCallum made clear that this effort is not meant to displace the SLS and Orion systems under development at NASA.  The limitations of the Inspiration Mars plan underscores that with today’s systems we can “just barely” flyby Mars.  To do significant science, SLS/Orion is needed, he said.

A hint was in the air that MacCallum and Poynter wanted to be the married couple that makes the journey, but Clark focused on selection criteria for the crew that would be based on “personalized medicine” that could predict reactions to radiation, for example.

No Furloughs Expected at NASA Due to Sequester

No Furloughs Expected at NASA Due to Sequester

NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden gave some welcome news to NASA employees today telling them that no furloughs are expected if the sequester goes into effect later this week.

Unlike many other government agencies, including the Department of Defense (DOD), the across-the-board spending cut of 5 percent would not require NASA to furlough workers to make ends meet.  “We have safely and efficiently phased out the Space Shuttle Program and managed existing programs to conservative spending levels,” Bolden said in a letter to employees. “This has postured us so that we do not plan to resort to furloughs at this time for NASA employees to meet our spending reductions under sequestration,” he added.

Bolden noted that the sequester will not be as easy on the agency’s industry partners or the nation as a whole, and would set back NASA’s plans since it will cut “about $726 million from the President’s budget request.”   That would cause delays in the commercial crew and space technology programs and “push back our next generation space vehicles.”

DOD is warning of much greater consequences for its activities and notified Congress last week that it may have to furlough all of its 800,000 civil servants.   The Department of Commerce, NOAA’s parent agency, told the Senate Appropriations Committee in a  February 8 letter that up to 2,600 NOAA employees would have to be furloughed under the sequester.

The sequester will go into effect on March 1 if Congress does not act.   Furloughs are not expected to begin until April since employees need to be notified in advance of when they will occur.  DOD indicated earlier that its workers could be furloughed for as many as 22 days before the end of the fiscal year on September 30, a loss of about 20 percent of their income.  Presidential appointees and Members of Congress are not affected, though Deputy Secretary of Defense Ash Carter vowed to turn back in an equivalent amount of his salary in solidarity with his workers.

The sequester applies to the Legislative Branch as well as the Executive Branch so congressional staff could be furloughed, too.

Space Policy Events of Interest for the Week of February 25-March 1, 2013 – UPDATE

Space Policy Events of Interest for the Week of February 25-March 1, 2013 – UPDATE

UPDATE, February 25:  Confirms the Dennis Tito press conference on Wednesday and adds two NASA science briefings on Wednesday (black holes) and Thursday (Van Allen Probes).

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead.  The House and Senate are in session this week.

During the Week

This is it!  Sequester week.  Unless Congress passes a bill and the President signs it into law before the end of the week, the across-the-board spending cuts known as the sequester will go into effect.  The sequester requires $85 billion in federal spending to be cut by September 30 and though just about everyone agrees it could have long-lasting, damaging effects on the economy, both sides show no sign of compromise.  Each simply continues to blame the other for the mess.

A number of congressional hearings have been and will be held on the impact on various agencies.  We learned ourselves this past week how difficult it is to penetrate the budget fog to accurately report that impact because it is caught up in other budget whirlwinds like how Congress will fund agencies for the last 6 months of FY2013.  Agencies are now operating under a 6-month Continuing Resolution (CR) that expires on March 27.  The betting is that Congress will extend that for the rest of FY2013, passing a “full year CR” that could have even more dramatic consequences for certain government-funded programs. 

One might wonder why Congress and the White House do not at least postpone the sequester until a decision is made on the rest of FY2013 and settle those two matters simultaneously, yet holding this Damoclean sword over the head of the nation’s economy for even one extra day seems unpalatable, too.

Meanwhile, the House Science, Space and Technology’s Space Subcommittee will hold a hearing on Wednesday to discuss the Culberson-Wolf Space Leadership Preservation Act to restructure NASA so that it has a Board of Directors and an administrator with a fixed term.  Reps. Wolf and Culberson will testify, along with Tom Young and Elliot Pulham.   The bill was introduced in the last Congress and is expected to be reintroduced soon.

Here is a list of all the space-policy related events we know about so far.

Monday, February 25

Tuesday, February 26

Wednesday, February 27

Thursday, February 28

Thursday-Friday, February 28 – March 1

Friday, March 1

 

Orbital Completes Successful Hot Fire Test of Antares – UPDATE

Orbital Completes Successful Hot Fire Test of Antares – UPDATE

UPDATE, February 23, 2013:    Orbital has posted a video of the test on YouTube.

ORIGINAL STORY, February 22, 2013:  Orbital Sciences Corp. conducted a successful hot fire test of the engines for its Antares rocket tonight at the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS) pad at NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility on the coast of Virginia. 

This was the second attempt at the hot fire test.  The first was aborted seconds before the test last week.  Antares uses Russian NK-33 engines refurbished by Aerojet and renamed AJ-26.

Antares and its Cygnus spacecraft are competitors to SpaceX’s Falcon 9 and Dragon capsule.   Both are partially funded by the government through NASA’s Commercial Orbital Transportation System (COTS) program.   Orbital started about a year and a half after SpaceX, replacing another company (RocketPlane Kistler) that did not meet its milestones.

The test today was another step in readying Antares for its first flight test.   Antares is designed to launch the cargo-carrying Cygnus spacecraft to the International Space Station in competition with SpaceX’s Falcon 9/Dragon combination.  NASA wanted at least two competitors to keep prices in check.  It contracted with SpaceX for 12, and with Orbital for 8, commercial cargo flights to the ISS.  Unlike SpaceX, though, Orbital is not participating in NASA’s commercial crew program.  It is focused on cargo delivery only.

The test tonight fired the AJ26 engines for 29 seconds, the full duration.  The next step in the development of Antares is a test launch.  Orbital said today it would take place in about 6 weeks.

Changed Space Environment Creates Multitude of Challenges, Say Panelists

Changed Space Environment Creates Multitude of Challenges, Say Panelists

Since the beginning of the Obama Administration, the national security space community has described today’s space environment as “congested, contested, and competitive.” Yet as panelists at an event Wednesday emphasized, the threats to U.S. space investments not only have security implications, but may impact the bottom line of companies and even the ability to continue relying on critical space-enabled services.

Organized by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the Secure World Foundation (SWF) and the Space Foundation, the event brought together experts from the national space security, academic, commercial and government sectors to discuss some of these threats. The event was held under the Chatham House rule, where everything is said on a non-attribution basis.

Panelists explained that the changed space environment, which now involves more than 60 space actors, challenges the rules, practices and expectations that were established more than 50 years ago when space was the sole domain of the Soviet Union and the United States. This situation forces changes in how governments and commercial actors interact and how they protect the systems on which they are becoming increasingly reliant.

Some of the key threats identified by the panel include the following:

  • Growing space dependence – Critical services such as weather monitoring, telecommunications, and positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) – such as the Global Positioning System (GPS) — would not be possible without space assets.  According to one of the panelists, there is a prevailing trend for the design of essential utilities that are heavily dependent on space assets, such as location-based utilities using GPS.  Heavy reliance on space-based assets is problematic to the extent that they often have no terrestrial backups, which would be costly, have no other market, and may become outdated before they are used.
  • Inadequate treaty-regime – The existing treaty regime, shaped by the interactions between the Soviet Union and the United States in the 1960s, may no longer be effective to guide space activities. According to a panelist, the need to incorporate and involve commercial companies and the need for an effective dispute resolution system are two issues that need to be addressed.  The panelist added that “a lot of thought and perhaps innovations,” will be needed to “tweak the legal regime to accommodate [new] trends.”
  • Combined Space Operations – One panelist said that when it comes to addressing challenges faced by military space activities, proposed solutions that cost a lot of money are “dead on arrival.” The community is instead shifting towards increased international cooperation. The Department of Defense is actively working to cooperate with its closest allies in areas such as space situational awareness (SSA) and exploring how to move towards combined space operations. While this is challenging, the panelist expressed confidence that steps were being taken in the right direction, saying “I’m kind of excited.”
  • Long-term Sustainability – As one of the agencies directed to promote the stability and long-term sustainability of space by the 2010 National Space Policy, the Department of State engages in a variety of bilateral and multilateral activities.  A panelist explained that an ongoing push to raise the significance of this issue in the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (UNCOPUOS) led to a study, likely to conclude this year, that would lead to “voluntary, non-binding, best practices guidelines” to promote long-term sustainability.
  • Industrial base issues – Threats to the sustainability of the satellite manufacturing industrial base were cited as a concern for both the commercial and military space communities. Nevertheless, export control reform has been taken as a positive step. One of the panelists thanked Congress for taking a step that was “a significant assist to U.S. manufacturing.”
  • In-space operations – Improved SSA has been a topic of interest for everyone from U.S. government civil and military officials negotiating data sharing agreements to commercial companies self organizing in ventures such as the Space Data Association. Beyond the need to avoid in-orbit collisions, reducing radio frequency and electromagnetic interference is also a concern.  

Space Policy Events for the Week of February 18-22, 2013

Space Policy Events for the Week of February 18-22, 2013

The following events may be of interest in the week ahead.  The House and Senate are in recess this week for the President’s Day holiday.

During the Week

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the coming week is what is NOT happening.   Congress is in recess rather than trying to solve the issue of whether the sequester will go into effect on March 1 or not.   Nothing seems to have changed on that front.  Both parties and both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue warn about the dire consequences if it goes into effect, assert they they have a reasonable alternative plan, and then put forward the same plans that have failed to garner sufficient support in the past.  Republicans continue to insist on reducing the deficit by spending cuts alone while Democrats continue to insist on a combination of spending cuts and tax increases.  The most recent plan, by Senate Democrats, would cut $110 billion from the deficit — $55 billion through spending cuts, $55 billion through tax increases on the wealthiest taxpayers — through the beginning of 2014.

Last week a number of hearings were held spelling out the effects of the sequester on defense and non-defense agencies.   The Senate Appropriations Committee published a series of letters from a large number of agencies (including NASA, NOAA’s parent Department of Commerce, and the Department of Defense) while the Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee circulated their own analysis.  There is no good news in any of it, but no solution is evident and the betting inside the beltway is that the $85 billion in cuts for FY2013 alone will, in fact, take place.  Those cuts would have to be absorbed by September 30 of this year making them particularly difficult.

Very little is ever certain in Washington, however, and perhaps with the week’s break, an alternative plan that can win support from all parties will yet emerge.

At the same time, Senate Republicans successfully blocked the nomination of Chuck Hagel to be the new Secretary of Defense last week through a procedural move that prevented the nomination from being brought to the Senate floor for consideration.  The Senate will return to the issue next week.  After a week’s delay, it may be that a sufficient number of Republicans will join with Democrats in allowing the nomination to be considered on an up or down vote wherein he would need only 51 votes (instead of 60) to win.   With 53 Democrats and two Independents who usually vote with the Democrats, he is very likely to win that vote. 

Meanwhile, this week — while Congress hopefully is working behind the scenes instead of in front of the cameras — there are four space policy-related meetings that may be of interest.

Tuesday, February 19

 Wednesday, February 20

Satellite Data Association: Asteroid DA14 Does Not Imperil Satellites

Satellite Data Association: Asteroid DA14 Does Not Imperil Satellites

The Space Data Association (SDA) reassured satellite operators and users yesterday that the close pass of asteroid 2012 DA14 tomorrow poses no threat to satellites.

The 150 foot (45 meter) diameter asteroid will pass by Earth at 17,150 miles (27,600 kilometers) altitude, between Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) where GPS and certain other navigation satellite constellations reside, and Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) where most communications satellites as well as other types of satellites are located.  

SDA analyzed the orbits of all the satellites in MEO and GEO that are listed in the public space catalog and concluded the asteroid “will come no closer than 1,000 km to any space object, and will not threaten any operational objects nor will it create debris in any orbit.”  SDA added that satellite operators worry only about “uncoordinated flybys of less than 10 km.”

NASA has been reassuring everyone that the asteroid poses no threat to Earth itself, either.   The asteroid’s closest approach to Earth will occur at 2:25 pm Eastern Standard Time (EST) tomorrow, February 15.  Since it will be daylight in the United States, it cannot be viewed from here, although NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory will provide commentary with real-time animation on NASA TV from 2:00-2:30 pm EST.

NASA has slightly refined its estimates of the altitude and time at closest approach.  Earlier it reported the time as 2:24 pm instead of 2:25 pm EST, and the altitude as 17,200 miles instead of 17,150 miles.